Padrón-Cabo Alexis, Rey Ezequiel, Kalén Anton, Costa Pablo B
Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Human Performance Laboratory, Center for Sport Performance, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA.
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Jul 21;73:219-228. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0146. eCollection 2020 Jul.
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of coordination training using an agility ladder compared with a control group on physical fitness and technical performance in youth soccer players. Eighteen male youth soccer players (age: 12.2 ± 0.4 years; body height: 158.3 ± 10.8 cm; body mass: 45.0 ± 8.0 kg) were randomly assigned to an agility ladder group (n = 10) or a control group (n = 8). The intervention program was carried out three times a week over six weeks. Before and after the training period, the 10 m sprint, 20 m sprint, dribbling speed test, agility test, and slalom dribbling test performances were assessed. Within-group analysis showed significant improvements (p < 0.005) in 10 m and 20 m sprint performance from the pre- to the post-test for the agility ladder group (-2.39% and -2.10%) and the control group (-2.54% and -1.44%). No significant differences (p > 0.005) were found from the pre- to the post-test in the dribbling speed test, agility test, slalom dribbling test, and skill index. In the between-group analysis, there were no differences between the agility ladder group and the control group in any variable. In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest coordination training with an agility ladder does not seem to be effective to improve physical fitness and dribbling. Therefore, this information could be beneficial to players and coaches for programming tasks during soccer training sessions.
本研究的目的是检验与对照组相比,使用敏捷梯进行协调训练对青少年足球运动员体能和技术表现的影响。18名男性青少年足球运动员(年龄:12.2±0.4岁;身高:158.3±10.8厘米;体重:45.0±8.0千克)被随机分配到敏捷梯组(n = 10)或对照组(n = 8)。干预计划每周进行三次,为期六周。在训练期前后,评估10米短跑、20米短跑、运球速度测试、敏捷性测试和蛇形运球测试的表现。组内分析显示,敏捷梯组(-2.39%和-2.10%)和对照组(-2.54%和-1.44%)从测试前到测试后在10米和20米短跑表现上有显著改善(p < 0.005)。在运球速度测试、敏捷性测试、蛇形运球测试和技能指数方面,从测试前到测试后未发现显著差异(p > 0.005)。在组间分析中,敏捷梯组和对照组在任何变量上均无差异。总之,本研究结果表明,使用敏捷梯进行协调训练似乎对提高体能和运球效果不佳。因此,这些信息可能对球员和教练在足球训练课程中安排任务有益。