Kriegisch V, Kuhn B, Dierks M-L, Achenbach J, Briest J, Fink M, Dusch M, Amelung V, Karst M
Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Schmerzambulanz, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, Herbert-Lewin-Platz 2, 10623, Berlin, Deutschland.
Schmerz. 2021 Apr;35(2):103-113. doi: 10.1007/s00482-020-00492-8.
On 31 December 2016, a total of 1206 physicians participated in the outpatient care of chronic pain patients according to the criteria of a special pain management program (QSV). Because of the largely existing shortage of treatment resources for chronic pain patients, there is a lack of data regarding the evaluation of outpatient pain management by highly specialized pain therapists.
In a hybrid Delphi procedure, a questionnaire concerning the content, structural and personal assessment of outpatient pain management in Germany was developed. With the help of this instrument, an internet-based cross-sectional survey of 281 QSV pain therapists from four German states (Berlin, Lower Saxony, Saxony, Baden-Württemberg) and of all the heads of university outpatient pain services (n = 36) in Germany was conducted.
The adjusted response rate of the survey was 35.9%. The response rate of the heads of university outpatient pain services was 66.7%. In 91% of the respondents the proportion of chronic pain patients in the medical practices was more than 70%. Whereas 67.3% were satisfied with the situation in their medical practice, 63.4% were dissatisfied with the current organizational structure of the pain management in Germany. They expressed their dissatisfaction especially in terms of budgeting regulations (69.3%), the cooperation with psychotherapists (69.3%) and interdisciplinary networking (50.5%). The 1‑year specialist training in pain management (87.1%) and the completion of a psychosomatic basic care course (90.1%) were assessed as a good preparation for the later profession. A multitude of free comments indicated that the pain specialist training is too short and insufficient. Most of the respondents considered the establishment of a specialist board certification for pain management more suitable from the perspective of physicians (61.4%) and the patients (54.5%). Of the heads of university outpatient pain services 70.8% expressed the wish for autonomous structures with separate budgets and 75.0% indicated that under the current conditions their outpatient pain services are not working profitably. Only 39.7% of the QSV pain therapists provided fellowship training for physicians and 57.6% were planning to retire during the next 10 years.
Highly specialized pain therapists are dissatisfied because of the lack of independence of the organizational structure of pain management care and the insufficient interdisciplinary network in outpatient pain management. A possible solution for a better pain management care and the recruitment problems may be the establishment of a board certification for pain management.
2016年12月31日,共有1206名医生按照一项特殊疼痛管理项目(QSV)的标准参与了慢性疼痛患者的门诊护理工作。由于慢性疼痛患者的治疗资源普遍短缺,缺乏由高度专业化疼痛治疗师对门诊疼痛管理进行评估的数据。
在一项混合德尔菲法程序中,编制了一份关于德国门诊疼痛管理的内容、结构和个人评估的问卷。借助该工具,对来自德国四个州(柏林、下萨克森州、萨克森州、巴登 - 符腾堡州)的281名QSV疼痛治疗师以及德国所有大学门诊疼痛服务部门负责人(n = 36)进行了基于互联网的横断面调查。
调查的调整后回复率为35.9%。大学门诊疼痛服务部门负责人的回复率为66.7%。在91%的受访者中,医疗实践中慢性疼痛患者的比例超过70%。虽然67.3%的人对其医疗实践状况感到满意,但63.4%的人对德国目前疼痛管理的组织结构不满意。他们尤其在预算规定(69.3%)、与心理治疗师的合作(69.3%)和跨学科网络(50.5%)方面表达了不满。疼痛管理方面的1年专科培训(87.1%)和身心基础护理课程的完成情况(90.1%)被评估为对后续职业的良好准备。大量的自由评论表明疼痛专科培训时间太短且不够充分。大多数受访者认为,从医生(61.4%)和患者(54.5%)的角度来看,设立疼痛管理专科委员会认证更为合适。在大学门诊疼痛服务部门负责人中,70.8%的人表示希望有独立的结构和单独的预算,75.0%的人表示在当前条件下他们的门诊疼痛服务部门无法盈利运营。只有39.7%的QSV疼痛治疗师为医生提供进修培训,57.6%的人计划在未来10年内退休。
高度专业化的疼痛治疗师因疼痛管理护理组织结构缺乏独立性以及门诊疼痛管理中跨学科网络不足而感到不满。改善疼痛管理护理和招聘问题的一个可能解决方案可能是设立疼痛管理委员会认证。