Suppr超能文献

与扫频源 OCT、Scheimpflug 和彩色 LED 设备的白对白测量的一致性。

Agreement of white-to-white measurements with swept-source OCT, Scheimpflug and color LED devices.

机构信息

Oftalvist Clinic, Alicante, Spain.

Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences Department, University of Valencia, C/Dr. Moliner 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;41(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01552-9. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the interchangeability of different devices for measuring white-to-white (WTW) distance.

METHODS

WTW distance was measured in 53 eyes of 53 patients using Anterion swept-source optical coherence topographer (SS-OCT), IOLMaster 700 SS-OCT, Pentacam HR Scheimpflug and Cassini color LED. Statistical analysis was done by means of the Friedman test and the post hoc Tukey test. The Bland-Altman analysis was applied to carry out pairwise comparisons with the average difference, 95% confidence interval of the average difference and limits of agreement 95% (LoA).

RESULTS

WTW values obtained by the Anterion, IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR and Cassini were: 11.84 ± 0.41 mm, 11.96 ± 0.41 mm, 11.68 ± 0.38 mm and 12.65 ± 0.52 mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in all pairwise comparison (p < 0.001). The lowest mean difference was found between the Anterion and IOLMaster 700 (- 0.11 mm) and the highest between the Pentacam HR and Cassini (- 0.96 mm). The widest LoA ranges were those that compared any device with the Cassini. LoA ranges when the other three devices were compared among them were similar: Anterion versus IOLMaster 700, Anterion versus Pentacam HR and IOLMaster versus Pentacam HR (about 0.2 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that there were statistically significant differences in WTW measurement among the four devices, but under a clinical point of view, we believe that Anterion and IOLMaster 700 may be considered interchangeable and so Anterion and Pentacam HR, however, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam HR may not and neither is Cassini with any of the other three devices.

摘要

目的

评估不同设备测量白对白(WTW)距离的可互换性。

方法

使用 Anterion 扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪(SS-OCT)、IOLMaster 700 SS-OCT、Pentacam HR Scheimpflug 和 Cassini 彩色 LED,对 53 例 53 只眼的 WTW 距离进行测量。采用 Friedman 检验和事后 Tukey 检验进行统计学分析。 Bland-Altman 分析用于进行两两比较,平均差值、平均差值的 95%置信区间和 95%(LoA)一致性限。

结果

Anterion、IOLMaster 700、Pentacam HR 和 Cassini 获得的 WTW 值分别为:11.84±0.41mm、11.96±0.41mm、11.68±0.38mm 和 12.65±0.52mm。所有两两比较均有统计学差异(p<0.001)。Anterion 和 IOLMaster 700 之间的平均差值最小(-0.11mm),Pentacam HR 和 Cassini 之间的平均差值最大(-0.96mm)。一致性限范围最宽的是将任何设备与 Cassini 进行比较。将其他三个设备相互比较时,一致性限范围相似:Anterion 与 IOLMaster 700、Anterion 与 Pentacam HR 和 IOLMaster 与 Pentacam HR(约 0.2mm)。

结论

我们的结果表明,四种设备测量 WTW 距离存在统计学差异,但从临床角度来看,我们认为 Anterion 和 IOLMaster 700 可视为可互换的,因此 Anterion 和 Pentacam HR 可视为可互换的,而 IOLMaster 700 和 Pentacam HR 则不可互换,Cassini 也不能与其他三个设备中的任何一个互换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验