Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Science and Risk Assessment Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Mar;40(3):564-605. doi: 10.1002/etc.4869. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) encompass a large, heterogenous group of chemicals of potential concern to human health and the environment. Based on information for a few relatively well-understood PFAS such as perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoate, there is ample basis to suspect that at least a subset can be considered persistent, bioaccumulative, and/or toxic. However, data suitable for determining risks in either prospective or retrospective assessments are lacking for the majority of PFAS. In August 2019, the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry sponsored a workshop that focused on the state-of-the-science supporting risk assessment of PFAS. The present review summarizes discussions concerning the ecotoxicology and ecological risks of PFAS. First, we summarize currently available information relevant to problem formulation/prioritization, exposure, and hazard/effects of PFAS in the context of regulatory and ecological risk assessment activities from around the world. We then describe critical gaps and uncertainties relative to ecological risk assessments for PFAS and propose approaches to address these needs. Recommendations include the development of more comprehensive monitoring programs to support exposure assessment, an emphasis on research to support the formulation of predictive models for bioaccumulation, and the development of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo methods to efficiently assess biological effects for potentially sensitive species/endpoints. Addressing needs associated with assessing the ecological risk of PFAS will require cross-disciplinary approaches that employ both conventional and new methods in an integrated, resource-effective manner. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:564-605. © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 是一大类具有潜在健康和环境危害的化学物质。根据对全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛酸等少数几种相对了解较多的 PFAS 的信息,有充分的理由怀疑至少有一部分可以被认为是持久性、生物累积性和/或毒性的。然而,对于大多数 PFAS,缺乏适合于前瞻性或回顾性评估确定风险的数据。2019 年 8 月,环境毒理化学学会主办了一次研讨会,重点讨论了支持 PFAS 风险评估的科学现状。本综述总结了有关 PFAS 的生态毒理学和生态风险的讨论。首先,我们总结了目前与问题制定/优先排序、暴露以及 PFAS 在世界各地的监管和生态风险评估活动中的危害/效应相关的现有信息。然后,我们描述了与 PFAS 生态风险评估相关的关键差距和不确定性,并提出了解决这些需求的方法。建议包括制定更全面的监测计划以支持暴露评估,强调支持生物累积预测模型制定的研究,以及开发用于有效评估潜在敏感物种/终点生物效应的计算、体外和体内方法。解决与评估 PFAS 的生态风险相关的需求将需要跨学科方法,以综合、资源有效的方式利用传统和新方法。环境毒理化学 2021;40:564-605。©2020 作者。环境毒理化学由 Wiley 期刊 LLC 代表 SETAC 出版。本文由美国政府雇员贡献,其工作在美国属于公有领域。