• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情的话语构建:我们如何在 Twitter 上对其进行概念化和讨论。

Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Modern Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, University Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0240010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240010. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240010
PMID:32997720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7526906/
Abstract

Doctors and nurses in these weeks and months are busy in the trenches, fighting against a new invisible enemy: Covid-19. Cities are locked down and civilians are besieged in their own homes, to prevent the spreading of the virus. War-related terminology is commonly used to frame the discourse around epidemics and diseases. The discourse around the current epidemic makes use of war-related metaphors too, not only in public discourse and in the media, but also in the tweets written by non-experts of mass communication. We hereby present an analysis of the discourse around #Covid-19, based on a large corpus tweets posted on Twitter during March and April 2020. Using topic modelling we first analyze the topics around which the discourse can be classified. Then, we show that the WAR framing is used to talk about specific topics, such as the virus treatment, but not others, such as the effects of social distancing on the population. We then measure and compare the popularity of the WAR frame to three alternative figurative frames (MONSTER, STORM and TSUNAMI) and a literal frame used as control (FAMILY). The results show that while the FAMILY frame covers a wider portion of the corpus, among the figurative frames WAR, a highly conventional one, is the frame used most frequently. Yet, this frame does not seem to be apt to elaborate the discourse around some aspects involved in the current situation. Therefore, we conclude, in line with previous suggestions, a plethora of framing options-or a metaphor menu-may facilitate the communication of various aspects involved in the Covid-19-related discourse on the social media, and thus support civilians in the expression of their feelings, opinions and beliefs during the current pandemic.

摘要

在过去的几个月里,医生和护士一直奋战在抗疫一线,与一种新型隐形敌人——新冠病毒作斗争。城市被封锁,市民被困在家中,以防病毒传播。在描述传染病和疾病时,人们通常会使用与战争相关的术语。目前的疫情大流行也使用了与战争相关的隐喻,不仅在公共话语和媒体中,而且在非大众传播专家发布的推文中也使用了这些隐喻。在此,我们基于 2020 年 3 月至 4 月期间在 Twitter 上发布的大量推文,对#Covid-19 相关话语进行了分析。我们首先使用主题建模对可以对论述进行分类的主题进行了分析。然后,我们发现,“战争”框架被用于讨论特定的话题,如病毒治疗,但不用于讨论社会隔离对民众的影响等其他话题。接着,我们测量并比较了“战争”框架与三个替代比喻框架(怪物、风暴和海啸)以及作为控制的字面框架(家庭)的流行度。结果表明,虽然“家庭”框架涵盖了语料库的更大部分,但在比喻框架中,“战争”——一个高度传统的框架——是使用最频繁的框架。然而,这个框架似乎并不适合详细阐述当前形势下所涉及的某些方面的论述。因此,我们得出结论,与之前的建议一致,大量的框架选择——或者说一个隐喻菜单——可能会促进社交媒体上与新冠病毒相关的论述的各个方面的交流,从而在当前的大流行期间支持民众表达自己的感受、意见和信仰。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/a71878993df4/pone.0240010.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/f5dffaebc36c/pone.0240010.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/eb6a150032ee/pone.0240010.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/18d055bd77a2/pone.0240010.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/3b692858d769/pone.0240010.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/965965ecebdf/pone.0240010.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/09415f34a6dc/pone.0240010.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/a71878993df4/pone.0240010.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/f5dffaebc36c/pone.0240010.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/eb6a150032ee/pone.0240010.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/18d055bd77a2/pone.0240010.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/3b692858d769/pone.0240010.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/965965ecebdf/pone.0240010.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/09415f34a6dc/pone.0240010.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/7526906/a71878993df4/pone.0240010.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter.新冠疫情的话语构建:我们如何在 Twitter 上对其进行概念化和讨论。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0240010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240010. eCollection 2020.
2
Metaphorical framing of the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan: A corpus driven critical analysis of war metaphors in news media.隐喻框架下的巴基斯坦新冠疫情:新闻媒体中战争隐喻的语料库驱动批判性分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0297115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297115. eCollection 2024.
3
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
4
Temporal and Location Variations, and Link Categories for the Dissemination of COVID-19-Related Information on Twitter During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in Europe: Infoveillance Study.欧洲SARS-CoV-2疫情期间推特上新冠疫情相关信息传播的时间和地点变化以及链接类别:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e19629. doi: 10.2196/19629.
5
Fighting Fire or Fighting War: Examining the Framing Effects of COVID-19 Metaphors.抗击火灾还是抗击战争:审视 COVID-19 隐喻的框架效应。
Health Commun. 2024 Sep;39(10):2026-2040. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2253398. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
6
Topics, Trends, and Sentiments of Tweets About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Temporal Infoveillance Study.关于新冠疫情的推文主题、趋势和情绪:时间信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 23;22(10):e22624. doi: 10.2196/22624.
7
Media framing of fighting COVID-19 in China.中国抗击新冠疫情的媒体框架
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 May;43(4):966-970. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13271. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
8
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
9
Top Concerns of Tweeters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study.新冠疫情期间推特用户的主要担忧:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(4):e19016. doi: 10.2196/19016.
10
Framing of and Attention to COVID-19 on Twitter: Thematic Analysis of Hashtags.推特上对 COVID-19 的框架构建和关注:主题分析标签。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 10;23(9):e30800. doi: 10.2196/30800.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Health Advocacy in Times of Pandemic: An Analysis of the Medicare-For-All Debate on Twitter During COVID-19.大流行时期的公共卫生倡导:对新冠疫情期间推特上全民医保辩论的分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 16;15(2):223. doi: 10.3390/bs15020223.
2
Correction: Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter.更正:构建新冠疫情框架:我们如何在推特上对这一流行病进行概念化和讨论。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 2;19(7):e0306644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306644. eCollection 2024.
3
Twitter Analysis of Health Care Workers' Sentiment and Discourse Regarding Post-COVID-19 Condition in Children and Young People: Mixed Methods Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Zika discourse in the Americas: A multilingual topic analysis of Twitter.美洲的寨卡话语:推特上的多语种主题分析。
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0216922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216922. eCollection 2019.
2
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.2016年美国总统大选期间推特上的假新闻。
Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):374-378. doi: 10.1126/science.aau2706.
3
Virtual Zika transmission after the first U.S. case: who said what and how it spread on Twitter.首例美国寨卡病毒病例后出现的虚拟寨卡病毒传播:谁说了什么以及它是如何在 Twitter 上传播的。
社交媒体分析医护人员对儿童和青少年新冠后状况的情绪和言论:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 17;26:e50139. doi: 10.2196/50139.
4
COVID-19 as WATER? The functions of WATER metaphors in the metaphorical representation of COVID-19.COVID-19 如“水”?COVID-19 隐喻中“水”隐喻的功能。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0292806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292806. eCollection 2023.
5
COVID-19 crisis management of German ICU clinicians in leadership - a metaphor analysis.德国 ICU 临床医生在领导力下的 COVID-19 危机管理-隐喻分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 8;11:1160094. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1160094. eCollection 2023.
6
Who works on the 'frontline'? comparing constructions of 'frontline' work before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.谁在“前线”工作?比较新冠疫情之前和期间“前线”工作的构成。
Appl Corpus Linguistics. 2023 Dec;3(3):100059. doi: 10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100059. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
7
Exploring pandemic metaphors in educational contexts: a survey on the language of teachers and educators in Reggio Emilia, Italy.探索教育背景下的疫情隐喻:对意大利雷焦艾米利亚教师和教育工作者语言的调查。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 16;14:1192653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192653. eCollection 2023.
8
Crises information dissemination through social media in the UK and Saudi Arabia: A linguistic perspective.社交媒体在英国和沙特阿拉伯的危机信息传播:语言视角。
PLoS One. 2023 May 5;18(5):e0284857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284857. eCollection 2023.
9
Bibliometric, network, and thematic mapping analyses of metaphor and discourse in COVID-19 publications from 2020 to 2022.2020年至2022年新冠疫情出版物中隐喻和话语的文献计量、网络和主题映射分析。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 16;13:1062943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062943. eCollection 2022.
10
Flu-like pandemics and metaphor pre-covid: A corpus investigation.流感样大流行与新冠疫情前的隐喻:一项语料库研究
Discourse Context Media. 2021 Jun;41:100503. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100503. Epub 2021 May 7.
Am J Infect Control. 2018 May;46(5):549-557. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.015. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
4
Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users' Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation.构建社会研究中发布推特数据的伦理框架:兼顾用户观点、网络环境及算法评估
Sociology. 2017 Dec;51(6):1149-1168. doi: 10.1177/0038038517708140. Epub 2017 May 26.
5
What Are People Tweeting About Zika? An Exploratory Study Concerning Its Symptoms, Treatment, Transmission, and Prevention.人们在推特上热议寨卡病毒的哪些方面?一项关于其症状、治疗、传播及预防的探索性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Jun 19;3(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7157.
6
Combining Search, Social Media, and Traditional Data Sources to Improve Influenza Surveillance.结合搜索、社交媒体和传统数据源以改善流感监测。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 29;11(10):e1004513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004513. eCollection 2015 Oct.
7
Detecting themes of public concern: a text mining analysis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Ebola live Twitter chat.检测公众关注的主题:对疾病控制与预防中心埃博拉疫情推特实时聊天内容的文本挖掘分析
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Oct 1;43(10):1109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
Disease detection or public opinion reflection? Content analysis of tweets, other social media, and online newspapers during the measles outbreak in The Netherlands in 2013.疾病检测还是民意反映?2013年荷兰麻疹疫情期间推文、其他社交媒体及在线报纸的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 26;17(5):e128. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3863.
9
The online use of Violence and Journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: a mixed methods study.与健康专业人员相比,癌症患者对暴力和旅程隐喻的在线使用:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Mar;7(1):60-66. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000785. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
10
Twitter improves influenza forecasting.推特可改善流感预测。
PLoS Curr. 2014 Oct 28;6:ecurrents.outbreaks.90b9ed0f59bae4ccaa683a39865d9117. doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.90b9ed0f59bae4ccaa683a39865d9117.