Northwestern University, 633 Clark St, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
J Relig Health. 2022 Apr;61(2):1139-1154. doi: 10.1007/s10943-020-01089-2. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
The quantifiable health benefits of spiritual practice and religious community have inspired a movement toward addressing religion within health care and medical education, yet biomedical professionals still often avoid this topic (Giordano and Engebretson in Explore 2(3):216--225, 2006; Post et al. in Ann Intern Med 132(7):578, 2000). This is largely due to a lack of clarity on how to ethically engage with diverse spiritual practices and maintain professional boundaries regarding spiritual care. However, a majority of patients desire increased incorporation of spirituality in medical discussions, indicating a deficit in care that must be addressed (Best et al. in Patient Educ Couns 98(11):1320-1328, 2015; Zaidi in AMA J Ethics 20(7), 2018). In this article, I clarify what constitutes successful spiritual care by identifying its key components and major challenges. I then make recommendations for ethically mindful, comprehensive spiritual care and consider potential next steps including structural changes that prioritize compassion and empathy in medicine.
精神实践和宗教团体带来的可量化的健康益处,激发了人们在医疗保健和医学教育中关注宗教的运动,但生物医学专业人员仍然常常回避这个话题(Giordano 和 Engebretson 在《探索》2(3):216-225, 2006;Post 等人在《内科学年鉴》132(7):578, 2000)。这主要是因为人们对如何以合乎道德的方式参与不同的精神实践以及在精神关怀方面保持专业界限缺乏清晰的认识。然而,大多数患者希望在医学讨论中更多地融入灵性,这表明护理存在不足,必须加以解决(Best 等人在《患者教育与咨询》98(11):1320-1328, 2015;Zaidi 在 AMA J Ethics 20(7), 2018)。在本文中,我通过确定成功的精神关怀的关键组成部分和主要挑战,来阐明什么是成功的精神关怀。然后,我对合乎道德、全面的精神关怀提出建议,并考虑包括在医学中优先考虑同情和同理心的结构变革在内的潜在下一步措施。