Xue Shuwei, Jacobs Arthur M, Lüdtke Jana
Department of Experimental and Neurocognitive Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 26;11:421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00421. eCollection 2020.
Texts are often reread in everyday life, but most studies of rereading have been based on expository texts, not on literary ones such as poems, though literary texts may be reread more often than others. To correct this bias, the present study is based on two of Shakespeare's sonnets. Eye movements were recorded, as participants read a sonnet then read it again after a few minutes. After each reading, comprehension and appreciation were measured with the help of a questionnaire. In general, compared to the first reading, rereading improved the fluency of reading (shorter total reading times, shorter regression times, and lower fixation probability) and the depth of comprehension. Contrary to the other rereading studies using literary texts, no increase in appreciation was apparent. Moreover, results from a predictive modeling analysis showed that readers' eye movements were determined by the same critical psycholinguistic features throughout the two sessions. Apparently, even in the case of poetry, the eye movement control in reading is determined mainly by surface features of the text, unaffected by repetition.
文本在日常生活中常常会被重读,但大多数关于重读的研究都是基于说明文,而非诗歌等文学文本,尽管文学文本可能比重读其他文本的频率更高。为了纠正这种偏差,本研究以莎士比亚的两首十四行诗为基础。记录了参与者阅读一首十四行诗时的眼动情况,然后在几分钟后再次阅读。每次阅读后,借助问卷对理解和欣赏程度进行测量。总体而言,与首次阅读相比,重读提高了阅读流畅性(总阅读时间更短、回视时间更短、注视概率更低)以及理解深度。与其他使用文学文本的重读研究相反,欣赏程度并未明显提高。此外,预测建模分析的结果表明,在两个阶段中,读者的眼动都由相同的关键心理语言学特征决定。显然,即使是在诗歌阅读中,阅读时的眼动控制主要也由文本的表面特征决定,不受重复的影响。