• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于电子病历的出院处置工具遭遇困境:机器学习中临床数据准确性的相关性逐渐衰减

An Electronic Medical Record-Based Discharge Disposition Tool Gets Bundle Busted: Decaying Relevance of Clinical Data Accuracy in Machine Learning.

作者信息

Greenstein Alexander S, Teitel Jack, Mitten David J, Ricciardi Benjamin F, Myers Thomas G

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester Health Lab, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2020 Oct 14;6(4):850-855. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.08.007. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2020.08.007
PMID:33088883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7567055/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Determining discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been a challenge. Advances in machine learning (ML) have produced computer models that learn by example to generate predictions on future events. We hypothesized a trained ML algorithm's diagnostic accuracy will be better than that of current predictive tools to predict discharge disposition after primary TJA.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study from a single, tertiary referral center for primary TJA. We trained and validated an artificial neural network (ANN) based on 4368 distinct surgical encounters between 1/1/2013 and 6/28/2016. The ANN's ability to identify discharge disposition was then tested on 1452 distinct surgical encounters between 1/3/17 and 11/30/17.

RESULTS

The area under the curve and accuracy achieved during model validation were 0.973 and 91.7%, respectively, with 25% of patients being discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Within our testing data set, 6.7% of patients went to SNFs. The performance in the testing set included an area under the curve of 0.804, accuracy of 61.3%, sensitivity of 28.9%, and specificity of 93.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prediction tool using an electronic medical record-integrated ANN to predict discharge disposition after TJA based on locally generated data. Dramatically reduced numbers of patients discharged to SNFs due to implementation of a bundled payment model lead to poor recall in the testing model. This model serves as a proof of concept for developing an ML prediction tool using a relatively small data set and subsequent integration into the electronic medical record.

摘要

背景

确定全关节置换术(TJA)后的出院安排一直是一项挑战。机器学习(ML)的进展产生了通过示例学习以对未来事件进行预测的计算机模型。我们假设经过训练的ML算法在预测初次TJA后的出院安排方面,其诊断准确性将优于当前的预测工具。

方法

本研究是一项来自单一三级转诊中心的初次TJA的回顾性队列研究。我们基于2013年1月1日至2016年6月28日期间的4368次不同手术病例训练并验证了一个人工神经网络(ANN)。然后在2017年1月3日至2017年11月30日期间的1452次不同手术病例上测试该ANN识别出院安排的能力。

结果

模型验证期间获得的曲线下面积和准确率分别为0.973和91.7%,25%的患者出院后前往专业护理机构(SNFs)。在我们的测试数据集中,6.7%的患者前往SNFs。测试集的表现包括曲线下面积为0.804、准确率为61.3%、灵敏度为28.9%以及特异性为93.8%。

结论

这是首个使用集成电子病历的ANN基于本地生成的数据预测TJA后出院安排的预测工具。由于实施捆绑支付模式,出院前往SNFs的患者数量大幅减少,导致测试模型中的召回率较低。该模型作为使用相对较小数据集开发ML预测工具并随后集成到电子病历中的概念验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f9f/7567055/425f2627c90a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f9f/7567055/73d6e9c42150/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f9f/7567055/425f2627c90a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f9f/7567055/73d6e9c42150/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f9f/7567055/425f2627c90a/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
An Electronic Medical Record-Based Discharge Disposition Tool Gets Bundle Busted: Decaying Relevance of Clinical Data Accuracy in Machine Learning.基于电子病历的出院处置工具遭遇困境:机器学习中临床数据准确性的相关性逐渐衰减
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Oct 14;6(4):850-855. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.08.007. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Validation of a Predictive Tool for Discharge to Rehabilitation or a Skilled Nursing Facility After TJA.全膝关节置换术后转至康复或熟练护理设施预测工具的验证。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Sep 7;104(17):1579-1585. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00955. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
3
The value of artificial neural networks for predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient costs after anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.人工神经网络在预测解剖型和反式肩关节置换术后住院时间、出院去向和住院费用方面的价值。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov;29(11):2385-2394. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
4
A validated preoperative risk prediction tool for discharge to skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility following anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty.解剖型或反式肩关节置换术后入住熟练护理或康复设施的术前风险预测验证工具。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Apr;31(4):824-831. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.009. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
5
Does the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool predict discharge disposition after joint replacement?风险评估与预测工具能否预测关节置换术后的出院处置情况?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):597-601. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3851-z.
6
Machine Learning With Electronic Health Record Data Outperforms a Risk Assessment Prediction Tool in Predicting Discharge Disposition After Total Joint Arthroplasty.基于电子健康记录数据的机器学习在预测全膝关节置换术后出院去向方面优于风险评估预测工具。
Orthopedics. 2022 Jul-Aug;45(4):e211-e215. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20220225-02. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
7
Who Goes to Inpatient Rehabilitation or Skilled Nursing Facilities Unexpectedly Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?哪些人在全膝关节置换术后会意外地入住住院康复或熟练护理设施?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1348-1351.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
The use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in surgical patients in a bundled payment program.在按病种分值付费方案中,对手术患者使用风险评估和预测工具。
Int J Surg. 2017 Feb;38:119-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.038. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
9
Skilled Nursing Facilities After Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Time for Selective Partnerships Is Now!《全膝关节置换术后的康复护理机构:现在是选择合作伙伴的最佳时机!》
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3612-3616. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
10
Artificial Intelligence-Based Traditional Chinese Medicine Assistive Diagnostic System: Validation Study.基于人工智能的中医辅助诊断系统:验证研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jun 15;8(6):e17608. doi: 10.2196/17608.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning Prediction Model to Predict Length of Stay of Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasties: Results from a High-Volume Single-Center Multivariate Analysis.预测髋关节或膝关节置换术患者住院时间的机器学习预测模型:来自高容量单中心多变量分析的结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 31;13(17):5180. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175180.
2
Predicting Prolonged Hospital Stays in Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures Managed During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Chile: An Artificial Neural Networks Study.预测智利在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间接受治疗的老年髋部骨折患者的长期住院情况:一项人工神经网络研究
HSS J. 2023 May;19(2):205-209. doi: 10.1177/15563316221120582. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Arthroplasty Care Redesign Impacts the Predictive Accuracy of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool.关节置换护理再设计影响风险评估和预测工具的预测准确性。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2549-2554. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.035. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
2
Deep Learning Preoperatively Predicts Value Metrics for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Development and Validation of an Artificial Neural Network Model.深度学习术前预测初次全膝关节置换术的价值指标:人工神经网络模型的建立与验证。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2220-2227.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
3
Machine Learning and Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Forecasting for a Patient-Specific Payment Model.
Early prediction of patient discharge disposition in acute neurological care using machine learning.
利用机器学习对急性神经科护理中的患者出院去向进行早期预测。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):1281. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08615-w.
4
Can machine learning models predict failure of revision total hip arthroplasty?机器学习模型能否预测全髋关节翻修术失败?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):2805-2812. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04453-x. Epub 2022 May 4.
5
Machine learning in orthopaedic surgery.骨科手术中的机器学习。
World J Orthop. 2021 Sep 18;12(9):685-699. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i9.685.
机器学习与初次全膝关节置换术:患者特定支付模型的患者预测。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3617-3623. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.028. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
4
Skilled Nursing Facilities After Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Time for Selective Partnerships Is Now!《全膝关节置换术后的康复护理机构:现在是选择合作伙伴的最佳时机!》
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3612-3616. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
5
Predictors and Cost of Readmission in Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后再入院的预测因素和费用。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2759-2763. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
6
Bundled Payments in Total Joint Replacement: Keeping Our Care Affordable and High in Quality.全关节置换中的捆绑支付:保持我们的医疗服务价格合理且质量高。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Sep;10(3):370-377. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9423-6.
7
Decaying relevance of clinical data towards future decisions in data-driven inpatient clinical order sets.临床数据对数据驱动的住院临床医嘱集未来决策的相关性正在衰减。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jun;102:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
8
The use of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in surgical patients in a bundled payment program.在按病种分值付费方案中,对手术患者使用风险评估和预测工具。
Int J Surg. 2017 Feb;38:119-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.038. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
9
Can We Predict Discharge Status After Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Calculator to Predict Home Discharge.我们能否预测全关节置换术后的出院状态?一个预测居家出院的计算器。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2705-2709. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
10
Does "6-Clicks" Day 1 Postoperative Mobility Score Predict Discharge Disposition After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties?术后第1天的“6次点击”活动能力评分能否预测全髋关节和膝关节置换术后的出院情况?
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9):1916-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Feb 17.