Sajid Noor, Friston Karl J, Ekert Justyna O, Price Cathy J, W Green David
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Experimental Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Oct 21;10(10):161. doi: 10.3390/bs10100161.
Understanding the aetiology of the diverse recovery patterns in bilingual aphasia is a theoretical challenge with implications for treatment. Loss of control over intact language networks provides a parsimonious starting point that can be tested using in-silico lesions. We simulated a complex recovery pattern (alternate antagonism and paradoxical translation) to test the hypothesis-from an established hierarchical control model-that loss of control was mediated by constraints on neuromodulatory resources. We used active (Bayesian) inference to simulate a selective loss of sensory precision; i.e., confidence in the causes of sensations. This in-silico lesion altered the precision of beliefs about task relevant states, including appropriate actions, and reproduced exactly the recovery pattern of interest. As sensory precision has been linked to acetylcholine release, these simulations endorse the conjecture that loss of neuromodulatory control can explain this atypical recovery pattern. We discuss the relevance of this finding for other recovery patterns.
理解双语失语症中多种恢复模式的病因是一项具有治疗意义的理论挑战。对完整语言网络失去控制提供了一个简洁的出发点,可以通过计算机模拟损伤来进行测试。我们模拟了一种复杂的恢复模式(交替拮抗和矛盾翻译),以检验一个来自既定层次控制模型的假设,即控制的丧失是由神经调节资源的限制介导的。我们使用主动(贝叶斯)推理来模拟感觉精度的选择性丧失,即对感觉原因的信心。这种计算机模拟损伤改变了对与任务相关状态(包括适当行动)的信念精度,并精确再现了感兴趣的恢复模式。由于感觉精度与乙酰胆碱释放有关,这些模拟支持了神经调节控制丧失可以解释这种非典型恢复模式的推测。我们讨论了这一发现与其他恢复模式的相关性。