Suppr超能文献

系统性红斑狼疮及自身免疫性疾病中的抗线粒体5型抗体和抗心磷脂抗体

Anti-mitochondrial type 5 antibodies and anti-cardiolipin antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus and auto-immune diseases.

作者信息

Meyer O, Abuaf N, Cyna L, Homberg J C, Kahn M F, Ryckewaert A

机构信息

Laboratoire d'Immuno-Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.

出版信息

Clin Exp Immunol. 1987 Sep;69(3):485-92.

Abstract

Twenty sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and high titre of IgG anti-cardiolipin antibodies (ACA) were studied in order to evaluate the prevalence of anti-mitochondrial type 5 antibodies (AMA 5). None of these sera were found to be AMA 5 positive but five of 18 were positive for VDRL. Twenty sera from patients with AMA 5 were studied in order to evaluate the prevalence of ACA: only six of 20 were positive for ACA. In contrast to this finding, 15 of the 20 sera positive for AMA 5 were also positive for VDRL (P less than 0.001). The six sera positive for ACA and AMA 5 were absorbed with cardiolipin micelles. This absorption eliminated the ACA activity but not the AMA 5 activity. Despite the clinical similarities between the two groups of patients with AMA 5 or ACA, these data suggest that patients with AMA 5 and patients with ACA belong to two different subsets of SLE or SLE-like syndromes and that AMA 5 antigen is different from cardiolipin.

摘要

为评估抗线粒体5型抗体(AMA 5)的流行情况,对20份来自系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者且抗心磷脂抗体(ACA)滴度高的血清进行了研究。这些血清中均未发现AMA 5呈阳性,但18份中有5份VDRL呈阳性。为评估ACA的流行情况,对20份AMA 5阳性患者的血清进行了研究:20份中只有6份ACA呈阳性。与这一发现相反,AMA 5阳性的20份血清中有15份VDRL也呈阳性(P小于0.001)。对6份ACA和AMA 5均呈阳性的血清用磷脂酰胆碱微团进行吸收处理。这种吸收消除了ACA活性,但未消除AMA 5活性。尽管两组AMA 5或ACA患者在临床上有相似之处,但这些数据表明,AMA 5患者和ACA患者属于SLE或SLE样综合征的两个不同亚组,且AMA 5抗原与心磷脂不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33d1/1542381/18add967bb58/clinexpimmunol00108-0006-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验