Meyer O, Abuaf N, Cyna L, Homberg J C, Kahn M F, Ryckewaert A
Laboratoire d'Immuno-Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Clin Exp Immunol. 1987 Sep;69(3):485-92.
Twenty sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and high titre of IgG anti-cardiolipin antibodies (ACA) were studied in order to evaluate the prevalence of anti-mitochondrial type 5 antibodies (AMA 5). None of these sera were found to be AMA 5 positive but five of 18 were positive for VDRL. Twenty sera from patients with AMA 5 were studied in order to evaluate the prevalence of ACA: only six of 20 were positive for ACA. In contrast to this finding, 15 of the 20 sera positive for AMA 5 were also positive for VDRL (P less than 0.001). The six sera positive for ACA and AMA 5 were absorbed with cardiolipin micelles. This absorption eliminated the ACA activity but not the AMA 5 activity. Despite the clinical similarities between the two groups of patients with AMA 5 or ACA, these data suggest that patients with AMA 5 and patients with ACA belong to two different subsets of SLE or SLE-like syndromes and that AMA 5 antigen is different from cardiolipin.
为评估抗线粒体5型抗体(AMA 5)的流行情况,对20份来自系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者且抗心磷脂抗体(ACA)滴度高的血清进行了研究。这些血清中均未发现AMA 5呈阳性,但18份中有5份VDRL呈阳性。为评估ACA的流行情况,对20份AMA 5阳性患者的血清进行了研究:20份中只有6份ACA呈阳性。与这一发现相反,AMA 5阳性的20份血清中有15份VDRL也呈阳性(P小于0.001)。对6份ACA和AMA 5均呈阳性的血清用磷脂酰胆碱微团进行吸收处理。这种吸收消除了ACA活性,但未消除AMA 5活性。尽管两组AMA 5或ACA患者在临床上有相似之处,但这些数据表明,AMA 5患者和ACA患者属于SLE或SLE样综合征的两个不同亚组,且AMA 5抗原与心磷脂不同。