Faculty of Communication, Culture and Society, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0241389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241389. eCollection 2020.
This study develops and tests a theoretical framework, which draws on herd behavior literature and explains how and under what conditions tabloids' attention to misinformation drives broadsheets' attention to misinformation. More specifically, the study analyzes all cases of political and business misinformation in Switzerland and the U.K. between 2002 and 2018, which are selected based on corresponding Swiss and U.K. press councils' rulings (N = 114). The findings show that during amplifying events (i.e., election campaigns and economic downturns) tabloids allocate more attention to political and business misinformation, which, in turn, drives broadsheets to allocate more attention to the misinformation as well-and especially if the misinformation serves broadsheets' ideological goals. Moreover, the findings show differences between Swiss and U.K. media markets only in the case of business misinformation and suggest that the attention allocation process depends in particular on the strength of the amplifying event in a media market. Thereby, this study contributes to the understanding of how and under what conditions misinformation spreads in media markets.
本研究构建并检验了一个理论框架,该框架借鉴了羊群行为文献,并解释了小报对错误信息的关注如何以及在何种条件下会引发大报对错误信息的关注。具体来说,该研究分析了 2002 年至 2018 年间瑞士和英国所有涉及政治和商业错误信息的案例,这些案例是根据瑞士和英国相应的新闻委员会的裁决选择的(N=114)。研究结果表明,在放大事件(即选举活动和经济衰退)期间,小报会更多地关注政治和商业错误信息,这反过来又促使大报更多地关注错误信息,尤其是如果错误信息符合大报的意识形态目标。此外,研究结果仅在商业错误信息的情况下显示了瑞士和英国媒体市场之间的差异,并表明关注分配过程尤其取决于媒体市场中放大事件的强度。因此,本研究有助于理解错误信息在媒体市场中是如何以及在何种条件下传播的。