Panayiotou Margarita, Santos Joãο, Black Louise, Humphrey Neil
University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Assessment. 2022 Mar;29(2):257-271. doi: 10.1177/1073191120971351. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
Since its development over a decade ago, the Social Skills Improvement System (SSIS) has been one of the most widely used measures of social skills in children. However, evidence of its structural validity has been scant. The current study examined the original seven-factor and more recent five-factor structure (SSIS-SEL) of the self-report SSIS in a sample of English elementary school students ( = 3,331) aged 8 to 10 years ( = 8.66, = 0.59). A problematic fit was found for both structures with poor discriminant validity. Using exploratory graph analysis and bifactor-( - 1) modeling, we found support for a four-factor structure, the variation of which was captured by a general factor defined by "empathy and prosocial skills." Future researchers, particularly those interested in using specific domains of the SSIS, are urged to assess its structure in their studies, if their findings are to be theoretically meaningful.
自十多年前开发以来,社交技能提升系统(SSIS)一直是儿童社交技能最广泛使用的测量工具之一。然而,其结构效度的证据却很少。本研究在8至10岁(平均年龄 = 8.66,标准差 = 0.59)的3331名英国小学生样本中,检验了自我报告式SSIS最初的七因素结构和最近的五因素结构(SSIS-SEL)。结果发现,这两种结构的拟合度都存在问题,区分效度较差。通过探索性图分析和双因素 - (k - 1)建模,我们发现了对四因素结构的支持,其中的变异由“同理心和亲社会技能”定义的一般因素所捕捉。如果研究结果要有理论意义,未来的研究者,尤其是那些对使用SSIS特定领域感兴趣的研究者,被敦促在其研究中评估其结构。