• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

变革参与度、变革资源与变革需求:员工对组织变革持积极态度的一种模式

Change Engagement, Change Resources, and Change Demands: A Model for Positive Employee Orientations to Organizational Change.

作者信息

Albrecht Simon L, Connaughton Sean, Foster Kathryn, Furlong Sarah, Yeow Chua Jim Leon

机构信息

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

Nous Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 6;11:531944. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531944. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531944
PMID:33240144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7681240/
Abstract

The purpose of this conceptual article is to introduce the construct of change engagement and a model that also consists of change-related organizational resources, change-related job resources and demands, and change-related personal resources. We propose that change engagement is a construct that is theoretically and practically useful for understanding employee reactions to and adoption of organizational change. Drawing from existing models of employee engagement, we add to the change literature by identifying salient change-related organizational resources, job resources, job demands, and personal resources in a previously validated framework that brings together the literature on both engagement and change. By using the proposed change engagement framework, practitioners and researchers will potentially be able to effectively diagnose, manage, and optimize employee change readiness and enthusiasm for ongoing change. Furthermore, the change engagement model (CEM) provides practitioners and researchers with a comprehensive and practically useful model that will be easy to comprehend and communicate. The model can be applied to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of discrete change initiatives, as well as to ongoing change. The model is therefore well-suited to contemporary organizational contexts where change is widely recognized to be a constant.

摘要

本文概念性文章的目的是介绍变革参与度这一概念以及一个模型,该模型还包括与变革相关的组织资源、与变革相关的工作资源和需求,以及与变革相关的个人资源。我们认为,变革参与度是一个在理论和实践上都有助于理解员工对组织变革的反应和接受情况的概念。借鉴现有的员工敬业度模型,我们通过在一个先前经过验证的框架中识别出与变革相关的显著组织资源、工作资源、工作需求和个人资源,为变革文献增添了内容,该框架整合了有关敬业度和变革的文献。通过使用所提出的变革参与度框架,从业者和研究人员可能能够有效地诊断、管理和优化员工对持续变革的准备情况和热情。此外,变革参与度模型(CEM)为从业者和研究人员提供了一个全面且实用的模型,该模型易于理解和交流。该模型可应用于离散变革举措的规划、实施和评估,以及持续变革。因此,该模型非常适合当代组织环境,在这种环境中,变革被广泛认为是常态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d600/7681240/267813174ab5/fpsyg-11-531944-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d600/7681240/267813174ab5/fpsyg-11-531944-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d600/7681240/267813174ab5/fpsyg-11-531944-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Change Engagement, Change Resources, and Change Demands: A Model for Positive Employee Orientations to Organizational Change.变革参与度、变革资源与变革需求:员工对组织变革持积极态度的一种模式
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 6;11:531944. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531944. eCollection 2020.
2
The Influence of Change-Related Organizational and Job Resources on Employee Change Engagement.与变革相关的组织资源和工作资源对员工变革参与度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 13;13:910206. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910206. eCollection 2022.
3
Leader Humor and Employee Job Crafting: The Role of Employee-Perceived Organizational Support and Work Engagement.领导者幽默与员工工作重塑:员工感知到的组织支持和工作投入的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 8;11:499849. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.499849. eCollection 2020.
4
Factors predicting Registered Nurses' intentions to leave their organization and profession: A job demands-resources framework.预测注册护士离开组织和职业意向的因素:工作要求-资源框架。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):864-875. doi: 10.1111/jan.13497. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
5
Resources Matter: Combined Influence of Job Demands and Job Control on Creative Process Engagement.资源很重要:工作需求和工作控制对创意过程参与的综合影响。
J Psychol. 2019;153(2):141-160. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2018.1503588. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
6
The practical paradox of technology: The influence of communication technology use on employee burnout and engagement.技术的实际悖论:通信技术使用对员工倦怠和敬业度的影响。
Commun Monogr. 2016 Apr 2;83(2):239-263. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2015.1133920. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
7
The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being.工作重塑对工作要求、工作资源和幸福感的影响。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Apr;18(2):230-40. doi: 10.1037/a0032141. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
Positive psychology in the working environment. Job demands-resources theory, work engagement and burnout: A systematic literature review.工作环境中的积极心理学。工作需求-资源理论、工作投入与倦怠:一项系统的文献综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 20;13:1022102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022102. eCollection 2022.
9
Burnout, Engagement, and Organizational Culture: Differences between Physicians and Nurses.职业倦怠、工作投入与组织文化:医生与护士的差异
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2015 Sep 15;3(3):506-13. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2015.091. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
10
A managers' work engagement framework for the digital tasks.一个针对数字任务的管理者工作投入框架。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 24;14:1009459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1009459. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Fairness matters for change: A multilevel study on organizational change fairness, proactive motivation, and change-oriented OCB.公平影响变革:一项关于组织变革公平性、主动动机和以变革为导向的 OCB 的多层次研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 31;19(10):e0312886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312886. eCollection 2024.
2
Work engagement, impulsivity and, self-efficacy among Polish workers. Moderating role of impulsivity.波兰劳动者的工作投入、冲动性和自我效能感。冲动性的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 10;19(10):e0311856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311856. eCollection 2024.
3
Empowering Sustainable Growth and Workforce: Unveiling Challenges and Strategies for Retaining Community Pharmacists in Malaysia.

本文引用的文献

1
Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test.将工作要求和资源与员工敬业度和倦怠联系起来:理论扩展和元分析检验。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):834-48. doi: 10.1037/a0019364.
2
The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work.工作设计问卷(WDQ):开发并验证一种用于评估工作设计和工作性质的综合测量工具。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1321-39. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321.
3
Perceptions of organizational change: a stress and coping perspective.
推动可持续增长与劳动力发展:揭示马来西亚留住社区药剂师的挑战与策略。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Oct 12;11(5):163. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11050163.
4
Long-term effects of COVID-19 on work routines and organizational culture - A case study within higher education's administration.新冠疫情对工作流程和组织文化的长期影响——高等教育管理领域的一个案例研究
J Bus Res. 2023 Aug;163:113927. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113927. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
5
The psychological conditions for employee engagement in organizational change: Test of a change engagement model.员工参与组织变革的心理条件:变革参与模型的检验
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 20;14:1071924. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071924. eCollection 2023.
6
The Influence of Change-Related Organizational and Job Resources on Employee Change Engagement.与变革相关的组织资源和工作资源对员工变革参与度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 13;13:910206. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910206. eCollection 2022.
7
Reactions towards organizational change: a systematic literature review.对组织变革的反应:一项系统的文献综述。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Apr 13:1-24. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03070-6.
对组织变革的认知:压力与应对视角
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1154-62. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154.
4
A longitudinal study of employee adaptation to organizational change: the role of change-related information and change-related self-efficacy.一项关于员工适应组织变革的纵向研究:变革相关信息及变革相关自我效能感的作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2004 Jan;9(1):11-27. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.9.1.11.
5
Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure.对变革的抗拒:开发一种个体差异测量方法。
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Aug;88(4):680-93. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680.
6
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.核心情感与情绪的心理建构。
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):145-72. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145.
7
Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model.对组织变革的承诺:一个三要素模型的扩展
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Jun;87(3):474-87. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474.
8
The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.积极情绪在积极心理学中的作用。积极情绪的拓展与建构理论。
Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):218-26. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218.
9
Organizational cynicism: bases and consequences.组织犬儒主义:根源与后果。
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2000 Aug;126(3):269-92.
10
Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace.重组工作场所中对变革的开放性的预测因素与结果
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Feb;85(1):132-42. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.132.