Chen Hao, Tang Runyu, Song Xiaopeng, Zong Ran, Liu Jie, Jin Chuyue, Deng Kexue
Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):7291-7305. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-118. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) is a valuable tool for detecting acute brain lesions but does suffer from image distortions. Multishot echo-planar imaging (msEPI) is a technique for reducing such distortions. This study aimed to compare the image quality and diagnostic efficacy of ssEPI- and msEPI-DWI at 5.0 T for brain disease detection.
This study retrospectively reviewed images of 107 consecutive patients with suspected brain diseases who underwent ssEPI- and msEPI-DWI at 5.0 T at the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from August 2023 to September 2023. Two radiologists independently graded image quality and measured the image distortion. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated and compared between ssEPI- and msEPI-DWI. Image quality scores were compared using the Wilcoxon test and other continuous variables by the paired -test. The diagnostic accuracy of ADC values in distinguishing lesions from normal-appearing tissues was measured with the area under the curve (AUC).
Image quality evaluation and distortion analysis revealed that msEPI-DWI significantly outperformed ssEPI-DWI (two-sided P<0.001). No significant difference was observed in signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, or ADC values between msEPI- and ssEPI-DWI (two-sided P≥0.601). The ADC values of msEPI- and ssEPI-DWI showed strong correlations for both lesions (r=0.97) and contralateral normal tissues (r=0.91) (two-sided P<0.001). Compared to those of the contralateral white matter, ADC values of low-grade gliomas (LGGs) were significantly higher [ssEPI-DWI: 1,119.9±273.1 . 805.1±73.9; msEPI-DWI: 1,196.2±355.6 . 757.3±98.0 (unit: ×10 mm/s)], while the ADC values of acute cerebral infarction (ACI) lesions were significantly lower [ssEPI-DWI: 603.9±273.2 . 888.9±212.0; msEPI-DWI: 538.0±281.2 . 905.0±188.9 (unit: ×10 mm/s)] (two-sided P≤0.003). The AUCs for detecting LGGs were excellent for both ssEPI-DWI [AUC =0.934; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-1.00] and msEPI-DWI (AUC =0.944; 95% CI: 0.86-1.00) (two-sided P<0.001; two-sided DeLong test: P=0.833).
As compared to ssEPI-DWI, msEPI-DWI, when performed at 5.0 T, demonstrated superior image quality and less anatomical distortion in a wide spectrum of brain diseases and showed promising diagnostic performance for LGGs and ACI. In the future, msEPI-DWI at 5.0 T could become clinically routine in the diagnosis and grading of brain disorders.
采用单次激发回波平面成像(ssEPI)的扩散加权成像(DWI)是检测急性脑病变的一种有价值的工具,但确实存在图像失真问题。多次激发回波平面成像(msEPI)是一种减少此类失真的技术。本研究旨在比较5.0 T时ssEPI-DWI和msEPI-DWI在脑部疾病检测中的图像质量和诊断效能。
本研究回顾性分析了2023年8月至2023年9月在中国科学技术大学附属第一医院接受5.0 T的ssEPI-DWI和msEPI-DWI检查的107例连续疑似脑部疾病患者的图像。两名放射科医生独立对图像质量进行评分并测量图像失真。计算并比较ssEPI-DWI和msEPI-DWI之间的信噪比、对比噪声比和表观扩散系数(ADC)。使用Wilcoxon检验比较图像质量评分,使用配对t检验比较其他连续变量。用曲线下面积(AUC)测量ADC值在区分病变与正常组织中的诊断准确性。
图像质量评估和失真分析显示,msEPI-DWI明显优于ssEPI-DWI(双侧P<0.001)。msEPI-DWI和ssEPI-DWI之间在信噪比、对比噪声比或ADC值方面未观察到显著差异(双侧P≥0.601)。msEPI-DWI和ssEPI-DWI的ADC值在病变(r=0.97)和对侧正常组织(r=0.91)中均显示出强相关性(双侧P<0.001)。与对侧白质相比,低级别胶质瘤(LGG)的ADC值显著更高[ssEPI-DWI:1119.9±273.1. 805.1±73.9;msEPI-DWI:1196.2±355.6. 757.3±98.0(单位:×10⁻³mm²/s)],而急性脑梗死(ACI)病变的ADC值显著更低[ssEPI-DWI:603.9±273.2. 888.9±212.0;msEPI-DWI:538.0±281.2. 905.0±188.9(单位:×10⁻³mm²/s)](双侧P≤0.003)。ssEPI-DWI[AUC =0.934;95%置信区间(CI):0.84 - 1.00]和msEPI-DWI(AUC =0.944;95% CI:0.86 - 1.00)检测LGG的AUC均极佳(双侧P<0.001;双侧DeLong检验:P=0.833)。
与ssEPI-DWI相比,5.0 T时的msEPI-DWI在多种脑部疾病中显示出更高的图像质量和更少的解剖失真,并且对LGG和ACI显示出有前景的诊断性能。未来,5.0 T时的msEPI-DWI可能会成为脑部疾病诊断和分级的临床常规检查。