School of Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Australia.
Division of Sport and Recreation, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Newzealand.
Int J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;42(8):740-748. doi: 10.1055/a-1302-8002. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of high-intensity interval training shock microcycles (HIIT) on endurance, running economy and change of direction economy in female soccer players. Nineteen sub-elite female soccer players were randomised to two groups: HIIT (10 HIIT sessions over 13 days) or HIIT (4 HIIT sessions over 13 days) interventions. Endurance performance was evaluated through the 30-15 intermittent fitness test (30-15); running economy over a 5-min treadmill run; and change of direction economy over two conditions: (1) 5-min 20m shuttle run, and (2) 5-min 10m shuttle run. HIIT significantly improved 30-15 scores compared to baseline (+4.4%, p=0.009; =0.96) and 30-15 scores relative to HIIT (p=0.002; =2.01). There was no significant interaction (group×time) for running economy and change of direction economy. Pre- to post- intervention there was a significant main time effect for blood lactate over 20m and 10m shuttle runs (p<0.001 and p=0.037, respectively), with large (=0.93) an moderate (=0.53) changes observed for the HIIT over the two distances, respectively. HIIT may be more effective than HIIT to improve 30-15 over shorter training periods but may not affect running economy and change of direction economy.
本研究旨在评估高强度间歇训练冲击微周期(HIIT)对女性足球运动员耐力、跑动经济性和变向经济性的影响。19 名次精英女性足球运动员被随机分为两组:HIIT(13 天内进行 10 次 HIIT 训练)或 HIIT(13 天内进行 4 次 HIIT 训练)干预。耐力表现通过 30-15 间歇体能测试(30-15)进行评估;在跑步机上跑 5 分钟评估跑动经济性;通过两种条件评估变向经济性:(1)5 分钟 20 米穿梭跑,(2)5 分钟 10 米穿梭跑。与基线相比,HIIT 显著提高了 30-15 成绩(+4.4%,p=0.009;=0.96)和相对 HIIT 的 30-15 成绩(p=0.002;=2.01)。跑动经济性和变向经济性在组间没有显著的交互作用(组×时间)。干预前后,20 米和 10 米穿梭跑的血乳酸有显著的主要时间效应(p<0.001 和 p=0.037),HIIT 在两个距离上分别观察到较大(=0.93)和中等(=0.53)的变化。HIIT 可能比 HIIT 更有效地在较短的训练周期内提高 30-15 的成绩,但可能不会影响跑动经济性和变向经济性。