Modrzejewski Dominik, Hartung Frank, Lehnert Heike, Sprink Thorben, Kohl Christian, Keilwagen Jens, Wilhelm Ralf
Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Julius Kühn-Institute, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Nov 23;11:574959. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.574959. eCollection 2020.
CRISPR/Cas enables a targeted modification of DNA sequences. Despite their ease and efficient use, one limitation is the potential occurrence of associated off-target effects. This systematic review aims to answer the following research question: Which factors affect the occurrence of off-target effects caused by the use of CRISPR/Cas in plants? Literature published until March 2019 was considered for this review. Articles were screened for relevance based on pre-defined inclusion criteria. Relevant studies were subject to critical appraisal. All studies included in the systematic review were synthesized in a narrative report, but studies rated as and were reported separately from studies rated as and or . In addition, we ran a binary logistic regression analysis to verify five factors that may affect the occurrence of off-target effects: (1) Number of mismatches (2) Position of mismatches (3) GC-content of the targeting sequence (4) Altered nuclease variants (5) Delivery methods. In total, 180 relevant articles were included in this review containing 468 studies therein. Seventy nine percentage of these studies were rated as having or . Within these studies, 6,416 potential off-target sequences were assessed for the occurrence of off-target effects. Results clearly indicate that an increased number of mismatches between the on-target and potential off-target sequence steeply decreases the likelihood of off-target effects. The observed rate of off-target effects decreased from 59% when there is one mismatch between the on-target and off-target sequences toward 0% when four or more mismatches exist. In addition, mismatch/es located within the first eight nucleotides proximal to the PAM significantly decreased the occurrence of off-target effects. There is no evidence that the GC-content significantly affects off-target effects. The database regarding the impact of the nuclease variant and the delivery method is very poor as the majority of studies applied the standard nuclease SpCas9 and the CRISPR/Cas system was stably delivered in the genome. Hence, a general significant impact of these two factors on the occurrence of off-target effects cannot be proved. This identified evidence gap needs to be filled by systematic studies exploring these individual factors in sufficient numbers.
CRISPR/Cas技术能够对DNA序列进行靶向修饰。尽管其使用简便且高效,但一个局限性是可能会出现相关的脱靶效应。本系统评价旨在回答以下研究问题:哪些因素会影响植物中使用CRISPR/Cas所导致的脱靶效应的发生?本评价纳入了截至2019年3月发表的文献。根据预先定义的纳入标准筛选文章的相关性。对相关研究进行严格评估。系统评价中纳入的所有研究都汇总在一篇叙述性报告中,但质量评级为“低”和“极低”的研究与质量评级为“高”和“中等”的研究分开报告。此外,我们进行了二元逻辑回归分析,以验证可能影响脱靶效应发生的五个因素:(1)错配数;(2)错配位置;(3)靶向序列的GC含量;(4)改变的核酸酶变体;(5)递送方法。本评价总共纳入了180篇相关文章,其中包含468项研究。这些研究中有79%的质量评级为“高”或“中等”。在这些研究中,评估了6416个潜在脱靶序列是否发生脱靶效应。结果清楚地表明,靶向序列与潜在脱靶序列之间错配数的增加会大幅降低脱靶效应发生的可能性。当靶向序列与脱靶序列之间存在一个错配时,观察到的脱靶效应发生率为59%,而当存在四个或更多错配时,脱靶效应发生率降至0%。此外,位于PAM近端前八个核苷酸内的错配显著降低了脱靶效应的发生。没有证据表明GC含量会显著影响脱靶效应。由于大多数研究应用标准核酸酶SpCas9且CRISPR/Cas系统稳定地递送至基因组中,关于核酸酶变体和递送方法影响的数据库非常匮乏。因此,无法证明这两个因素对脱靶效应发生有普遍的显著影响。这一已确定的证据空白需要通过足够数量的系统性研究来填补,以探究这些个体因素。