• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PCQ:产品设计用的首选舒适度问卷。

PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design.

机构信息

Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.

Vhp Human Performance, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Work. 2021;68(s1):S19-S28. doi: 10.3233/WOR-208002.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-208002
PMID:33337404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7902968/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Selecting the most suitable questionnaire(s) in comfort research for product design is always a challenge, even for experienced researchers.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this research is to create a list of Preferred Comfort Questionnaires (PCQ) for product design to help researchers in the selection of questionnaires for comfort research.

METHODS

Fifteen questionnaires that are often used in comfort research for product design were selected as candidate questionnaires. During the Second International Comfort Congress (ICC 2019), 55 researchers and practitioners working in the field of comfort joined together in a workshop to rate these questionnaires individually as well as rank them in groups based on their experience. The criteria of rating and ranking included easiness to answer, easiness for data interpretation, time needed to complete, the need for prior training, as well as mapping the applicable design phases and field of application.

RESULTS

The elicited responses related to each questionnaire were analyzed. For comfort research in five proposed application fields and four design phases, the preferred questionnaires were highlighted and categorized into four categories: preferred questionnaire, suitable for less prior training, suitable for fast completion and generally applicable, which led to a list of PCQ for product design.

CONCLUSION

We expect that the PCQ list can be used as a useful instrument to help researchers in selecting questionnaires for comfort research in product design.

摘要

背景

即使对于经验丰富的研究人员来说,在舒适性研究中选择最合适的问卷也始终是一项挑战。

目的

本研究旨在创建一份产品设计舒适性研究用首选舒适度问卷(PCQ)列表,以帮助研究人员选择舒适度研究问卷。

方法

选择了十五份常用于产品设计舒适性研究的问卷作为候选问卷。在第二届国际舒适大会(ICC 2019)期间,55 名从事舒适性研究的研究人员和从业者在一个研讨会上共同合作,根据他们的经验对这些问卷进行单独评分,并对其进行分组排名。评分和排名的标准包括回答的难易程度、数据解释的难易程度、完成所需的时间、是否需要事先培训,以及适用于设计阶段和应用领域的映射。

结果

分析了与每个问卷相关的应答。对于五个提出的应用领域和四个设计阶段的舒适性研究,突出了首选问卷,并将其分为四类:首选问卷、适合较少事先培训、适合快速完成和普遍适用,从而生成了一份产品设计用 PCQ 列表。

结论

我们希望该 PCQ 列表可用作有用的工具,帮助研究人员在产品设计舒适性研究中选择问卷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca5/7902968/03d1048e0333/wor-68-wor208002-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca5/7902968/65c6817d471a/wor-68-wor208002-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca5/7902968/eb6df4588f5a/wor-68-wor208002-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca5/7902968/03d1048e0333/wor-68-wor208002-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca5/7902968/65c6817d471a/wor-68-wor208002-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca5/7902968/eb6df4588f5a/wor-68-wor208002-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca5/7902968/03d1048e0333/wor-68-wor208002-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design.PCQ:产品设计用的首选舒适度问卷。
Work. 2021;68(s1):S19-S28. doi: 10.3233/WOR-208002.
2
Measuring patient-centredness in publicly funded fertility care: A New Zealand validation and international comparison of the Patient-Centred Questionnaire-Infertility.衡量公共资助生育护理中的以患者为中心程度:《以患者为中心问卷 - 不孕症》的新西兰验证及国际比较
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):265-271. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12869. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
3
Effect of scent on comfort of aircraft passengers.气味对飞机乘客舒适度的影响。
Work. 2021;68(s1):S273-S280. doi: 10.3233/WOR-208025.
4
Children's and Adults' Comfort Experience of Extra Seat Belts When Riding in the Rear Seat of a Passenger Car.儿童和成人乘坐乘用车后排时使用额外安全带的舒适体验。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S46-51. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1060416.
5
Assessing comfort in the epilepsy monitoring unit: Development of an instrument.评估癫痫监测单元中的舒适度:工具的开发。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Feb;91:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 21.
6
[Development and validation of a questionnaire for patient competence in coping with cancer (PCQ)].[一份用于评估癌症患者应对能力的问卷(PCQ)的编制与验证]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2019 Sep;65(3):239-256. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2019.65.3.239.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish language Person-centred Climate Questionnaire-family version.瑞典语以人为本的氛围调查问卷家庭版的心理测量评估
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Dec;29(4):859-64. doi: 10.1111/scs.12198. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
8
Not Me, But Reflects Me: Validating a Simple Implicit Measure of Psychological Capital.非我,而反映我:验证心理资本的一种简单内隐测量方法的有效性。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Sep-Oct;100(5):551-562. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1480489. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
Positive experiences of patient-centred care are associated with intentions to comply with fertility treatment: findings from the validation of the Portuguese version of the PCQ-Infertility tool.以患者为中心的护理的积极体验与遵守生育治疗的意愿相关:验证葡萄牙语版 PCQ-不孕工具的发现。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Sep;28(9):2462-72. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det259. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-S).以患者为中心的气候问卷中文版——员工版(PCQ-S)的心理测量学评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e017250. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017250.

引用本文的文献

1
Method for Assessing Numbness and Discomfort in Cyclists' Hands.评估自行车骑行者手部麻木与不适的方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;25(15):4708. doi: 10.3390/s25154708.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Iowa Fluoride Study Oral Health Questionnaire in Mexican Adolescents.爱荷华氟化物研究口腔健康问卷在墨西哥青少年中的心理测量特性。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):e51165. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51165. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Development of a Soft Robotics Module for Active Control of Sitting Comfort.用于主动控制坐姿舒适度的软体机器人模块的开发。

本文引用的文献

1
Shoe microclimate: An objective characterisation and subjective evaluation.鞋内微气候:客观描述与主观评价。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jul;78:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
2
Cultural adaptation and reliability of the General Comfort Questionnaire for chronic renal patients in Brazil.巴西慢性肾病患者一般舒适度问卷的文化适应性与信度
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Dec 21;25:e2963. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2280.2963.
3
The effect of human-mattress interface's temperature on perceived thermal comfort.人体与床垫界面温度对热舒适感的影响。
Micromachines (Basel). 2022 Mar 20;13(3):477. doi: 10.3390/mi13030477.
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
4
Effect of long term driving on driver discomfort and its relationship with seat fidgets and movements (SFMs).长期驾驶对驾驶员不适感的影响及其与座椅微动和移动(SFMs)的关系。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
5
Possibilities to improve the aircraft interior comfort experience.改善飞机内部舒适体验的可能性。
Appl Ergon. 2012 Mar;43(2):354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
6
Editorial: comfort and discomfort studies demonstrate the need for a new model.社论:舒适与不适研究表明需要建立新模式。
Appl Ergon. 2012 Mar;43(2):271-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
7
Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.比较数字评分量表、语言评分量表和视觉模拟量表评估成人疼痛强度的研究:系统文献回顾。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.
8
A critical examination of the concepts of face validity.对面部效度概念的批判性审视。
Educ Psychol Meas. 1947 Summer;7(2):191-205. doi: 10.1177/001316444700700201.
9
Determining mild, moderate, and severe pain equivalency across pain-intensity tools in nursing home residents.确定养老院居民疼痛强度测量工具中轻度、中度和重度疼痛的等效性。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(2):305-14. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.05.0051.
10
'Just fill in this form' - a review for designers.“只需填写此表格”——给设计师的一篇评论
Appl Ergon. 1975 Dec;6(4):213-20. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(75)90113-1.