Aix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU Méditerranée Infection, 19-21 bd Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France.
Southeastern Health Regional Observatory (ORS Paca), Marseille, France.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;20(1):1920. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10048-1.
In March 2020, as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) pandemic was spreading across the globe, many countries have implemented unprecedented lockdown measures. But how populations did react to these measures? We examined the case of France. Our aims were threefold: assessing some aspects of their impact on French's daily living conditions; investigating their attitudes toward the lockdown; investigating the factors associated with these attitudes.
A cross-sectional online survey was carried out 10 days after the nationwide lockdown (from March 27th to March 29th 2020), among a representative sample of the mainland French population aged 18 and over. A quota sampling method was applied to achieve a sample of 1012 respondents. We used a cluster analysis to obtain contrasted attitudinal profiles, and logistic regressions to investigated which factors were associated to these profiles.
After 10 days of lockdown, there were already significant consequences regarding respondents' living conditions and mental health. Most respondents supported the current lockdown. However, it appeared as a stopgap measure due to a lack of alternatives, and a large majority acknowledged its heavy drawbacks. We found three contrasted attitudinal profiles: full support (38%), strong but critical support (31%), limited support (31%). Regarding respondents' SES, low-income and low-education respondents were more likely to display critical or limited support to the lockdown, as well as those who reported deteriorated living conditions or psychological distress.
In France, the large public support to the lockdown was fragile. First, it was a critical consensus anchored in current controversies and recent social struggles. Second, it was weaker among people with a lows SES, especially since the lockdown have exacerbated preexisting social inequalities.
2020 年 3 月,随着 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情在全球蔓延,许多国家实施了前所未有的封锁措施。但是,民众对此类措施的反应如何?我们以法国为例进行了研究。我们的目的有三个:评估这些措施对法国人日常生活的一些影响;调查他们对封锁的态度;调查与这些态度相关的因素。
在全国性封锁(2020 年 3 月 27 日至 3 月 29 日)实施 10 天后,我们对 18 岁及以上的法国大陆代表性人群进行了横断面在线调查。采用配额抽样法获得了 1012 名受访者的样本。我们使用聚类分析获得了对比性的态度特征,并使用逻辑回归调查了哪些因素与这些特征相关。
在封锁的 10 天后,受访者的生活条件和心理健康已经出现了显著的变化。大多数受访者支持当前的封锁措施。然而,由于缺乏替代方案,这似乎只是一种权宜之计,绝大多数人都承认其存在严重的弊端。我们发现了三种具有对比性的态度特征:完全支持(38%)、强烈但批评性支持(31%)、有限支持(31%)。就受访者的社会经济地位(SES)而言,低收入和低教育程度的受访者更有可能对封锁持批评或有限的态度,以及那些报告生活条件恶化或心理困扰的受访者。
在法国,对封锁的广泛支持是脆弱的。首先,这是一个基于当前争议和最近社会斗争的批评性共识。其次,SES 较低的人群支持度较弱,尤其是因为封锁加剧了先前存在的社会不平等。