Pasek Małgorzata, Suchocka Lilia, Osuch-Pęcak Grażyna, Muzykiewicz Konrad, Iwańska Ewa, Kaducakowa Helena, Goździalska Anna, Goździalska Magdalena
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health, University of Applied Sciences in Tarnow, 33-100 Tarnow, Poland.
Faculty of Education and Psychology, Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce, 25-029 Kielce, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 10;10(2):226. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020226.
Quality of life studies in medicine, particularly in oncology, have become a basic tool used to assess patient's performance in different types of cancer and different modalities of treatment. The aim of this study was a subjective evaluation of the quality of life in cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The study has a longitudinal character and comprises four stages: before treatment, at the end of treatment, 5 months and 5 years after treatment. Standardized questionnaires such as EORTC QoL C30, HADS (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life C30 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and the authors demographic-clinical assessment survey were the study tools. Physical functioning was assessed as the highest before treatment and depreciated to the lowest value 5 years after treatment. Emotional functioning was the lowest before treatment and then decreased again in the fourth stage of the assessment. Global quality of life was the lowest in the fourth stage of the study. Memory and concentration were fairly good at every stage of the study, with the highest score at the end of the treatment. At stages 3 and 4, the respondent's social functioning was the best, followed by the ability to fulfil their social role. General health and quality of life were assessed by the respondents on a level slightly above average, though five years after treatment the score was slightly below average.
医学领域,尤其是肿瘤学中的生活质量研究,已成为评估不同类型癌症患者及不同治疗方式下患者表现的一种基本工具。本研究旨在对接受放射治疗的宫颈癌患者的生活质量进行主观评估。该研究具有纵向性质,包括四个阶段:治疗前、治疗结束时、治疗后5个月和治疗后5年。研究工具包括标准化问卷,如欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷C30(EORTC QoL C30)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)以及作者的人口统计学 - 临床评估调查。身体功能在治疗前评估为最高,在治疗后5年降至最低值。情绪功能在治疗前最低,然后在评估的第四阶段再次下降。生活质量在研究的第四阶段最低。记忆和注意力在研究的每个阶段都相当好,在治疗结束时得分最高。在第三和第四阶段,受访者的社会功能最佳,其次是履行其社会角色的能力。受访者对总体健康和生活质量的评估略高于平均水平,不过治疗五年后得分略低于平均水平。