• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多阶段卷积神经网络与 CBCT 组合图像的自动头影测量标志点识别系统。

Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Identification System Based on the Multi-Stage Convolutional Neural Networks with CBCT Combination Images.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea.

Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;21(2):505. doi: 10.3390/s21020505.

DOI:10.3390/s21020505
PMID:33445758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7828192/
Abstract

This study was designed to develop and verify a fully automated cephalometry landmark identification system, based on multi-stage convolutional neural networks (CNNs) architecture, using a combination dataset. In this research, we trained and tested multi-stage CNNs with 430 lateral and 430 MIP lateral cephalograms synthesized by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to make a combination dataset. Fifteen landmarks were manually and respectively identified by experienced examiner, at the preprocessing phase. The intra-examiner reliability was high (ICC = 0.99) in manual identification. The results of prediction of the system for average mean radial error (MRE) and standard deviation (SD) were 1.03 mm and 1.29 mm, respectively. In conclusion, different types of image data might be the one of factors that affect the prediction accuracy of a fully-automated landmark identification system, based on multi-stage CNNs.

摘要

本研究旨在开发和验证一种基于多阶段卷积神经网络(CNN)架构的全自动头影测量标志点识别系统,使用组合数据集。在这项研究中,我们使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)合成的 430 个侧位和 430 个 MIP 侧位头影测量片训练和测试了多阶段 CNN,以构建组合数据集。在预处理阶段,由经验丰富的检查者手动分别识别了 15 个标志点。手动识别的组内可靠性很高(ICC=0.99)。系统预测的平均径向误差(MRE)和标准偏差(SD)的结果分别为 1.03 毫米和 1.29 毫米。总之,不同类型的图像数据可能是影响基于多阶段 CNN 的全自动标志点识别系统预测准确性的因素之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/112ab558fc8b/sensors-21-00505-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/71efeba250a7/sensors-21-00505-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/603b4d5bc8b4/sensors-21-00505-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/36b7af1e0f9f/sensors-21-00505-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/8e24c8453e65/sensors-21-00505-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/149de2871c30/sensors-21-00505-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/112ab558fc8b/sensors-21-00505-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/71efeba250a7/sensors-21-00505-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/603b4d5bc8b4/sensors-21-00505-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/36b7af1e0f9f/sensors-21-00505-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/8e24c8453e65/sensors-21-00505-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/149de2871c30/sensors-21-00505-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5621/7828192/112ab558fc8b/sensors-21-00505-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Identification System Based on the Multi-Stage Convolutional Neural Networks with CBCT Combination Images.基于多阶段卷积神经网络与 CBCT 组合图像的自动头影测量标志点识别系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;21(2):505. doi: 10.3390/s21020505.
2
A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.一种基于知识的算法,用于在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像上自动检测头影测量标志点。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015 Nov;10(11):1737-52. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1173-6. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
3
Evaluation of a multi-stage convolutional neural network-based fully automated landmark identification system using cone-beam computed tomographysynthesized posteroanterior cephalometric images.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描合成的后前位头影测量图像评估基于多阶段卷积神经网络的全自动地标识别系统。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Mar 25;51(2):77-85. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.77.
4
The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.口腔颌面影像学中头影测量的可靠性:锥形束计算机断层扫描与二维数字化头颅侧位片的比较
Indian J Dent Res. 2016 Jul-Aug;27(4):370-377. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.191884.
5
Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence.基于人工智能的自动头影测量分析准确性评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02881-8.
6
Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能驱动的头影测量分析能否替代手动描记?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Aug 1;46(4). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae029.
7
Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.基于自动知识型地标检测算法的三维头影测量的准确性。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Jul;11(7):1297-309. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1334-7. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
8
The accuracy of a designed software for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks on CBCT images.一款用于在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像上自动定位颅面标志点的设计软件的准确性。
BMC Med Imaging. 2014 Sep 16;14:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-14-32.
9
Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.基于计算机的 CBCT 数据头影测量标志点自动标注。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Jan;12(1):113-121. doi: 10.1007/s11548-016-1453-9. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Automatic landmark identification in cone-beam computed tomography.锥形束计算机断层扫描中的自动标志点识别。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Nov;26(4):560-567. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12642. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated Measurements of Tooth Size and Arch Widths on Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography and Scan Images of Plaster Dental Models.锥形束计算机断层扫描和石膏牙模扫描图像上牙齿大小和牙弓宽度的自动测量
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Dec 29;12(1):22. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12010022.
2
Accuracy of cephalometric landmark and cephalometric analysis from lateral facial photograph by using CNN-based algorithm.基于卷积神经网络(CNN)算法的侧面面部照片中头影测量标志点及头影测量分析的准确性
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82230-z.
3
Exploring the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Image Detection: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a multi-stage convolutional neural network-based fully automated landmark identification system using cone-beam computed tomographysynthesized posteroanterior cephalometric images.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描合成的后前位头影测量图像评估基于多阶段卷积神经网络的全自动地标识别系统。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Mar 25;51(2):77-85. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.77.
2
How much deep learning is enough for automatic identification to be reliable?深度学习达到多少才能保证自动识别的可靠性?
Angle Orthod. 2020 Nov 1;90(6):823-830. doi: 10.2319/021920-116.1.
3
Automated cephalometric landmark detection with confidence regions using Bayesian convolutional neural networks.
探索人工智能在牙科图像检测中的应用:一项系统综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;14(21):2442. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212442.
4
Sex estimation using skull silhouette images from postmortem computed tomography by deep learning.利用深度学习对死后 CT 扫描的颅骨轮廓图像进行性别估计。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 30;14(1):22689. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74703-y.
5
Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能驱动的头影测量分析能否替代手动描记?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Aug 1;46(4). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae029.
6
Cephalometric landmark detection without X-rays combining coordinate regression and heatmap regression.无 X 射线的头影测量标志点检测:坐标回归和热图回归的结合。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 16;13(1):20011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46919-x.
7
Evaluation of deep learning and convolutional neural network algorithms accuracy for detecting and predicting anatomical landmarks on 2D lateral cephalometric images: A systematic review and -analysis.深度学习和卷积神经网络算法在二维侧位头影测量图像上检测和预测解剖标志点的准确性评估:一项系统综述与分析
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Jul;35(5):487-497. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.014. Epub 2023 May 23.
8
SinusC-Net for automatic classification of surgical plans for maxillary sinus augmentation using a 3D distance-guided network.基于 3D 距离引导网络的鼻窦 C-Net 用于上颌窦提升术手术方案的自动分类。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 19;13(1):11653. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38273-9.
9
Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmark Detection in Series of CT Slices Using Multi-Phased Regression Networks.使用多阶段回归网络在CT切片序列中进行三维颅面地标检测
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 1;13(11):1930. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111930.
10
Use of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Medicine, Forensic Anthropology and Clinical Anatomy.先进人工智能在法医学、法医人类学和临床解剖学中的应用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 12;9(11):1545. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111545.
基于贝叶斯卷积神经网络的具有置信区域的自动头影测量标志点检测。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01256-7.
4
Three-dimensional surgical accuracy between virtually planned and actual surgical movements of the maxilla in two-jaw orthognathic surgery.双颌正颌手术中上颌虚拟计划与实际手术移动之间的三维手术准确性。
Korean J Orthod. 2020 Sep 25;50(5):293-303. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.5.293.
5
Assessment of bone density changes following two-jaw surgery using multidetector computed tomography: A pilot study.使用多排螺旋计算机断层扫描评估双颌手术后的骨密度变化:一项初步研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2020 May 25;50(3):157-169. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.3.157.
6
Web-based fully automated cephalometric analysis by deep learning.基于深度学习的网络全自动头影测量分析
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Oct;194:105513. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105513. Epub 2020 May 6.
7
Comparison of three midsagittal planes for three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography head reorientation.用于三维锥形束计算机断层扫描头部重新定位的三个正中矢状面的比较
Korean J Orthod. 2020 Jan;50(1):3-12. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.3. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Artificial intelligence in orthodontics : Evaluation of a fully automated cephalometric analysis using a customized convolutional neural network.正畸学中的人工智能:使用定制卷积神经网络对全自动头影测量分析的评估
J Orofac Orthop. 2020 Jan;81(1):52-68. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00203-8. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
Convolutional neural networks for dental image diagnostics: A scoping review.卷积神经网络在口腔医学影像诊断中的应用:范围综述。
J Dent. 2019 Dec;91:103226. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103226. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
10
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:自动识别头影测量标志点:
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):69-76. doi: 10.2319/022019-129.1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.