Arulmozhi Elanchezhian, Basak Jayanta Kumar, Sihalath Thavisack, Park Jaesung, Kim Hyeon Tae, Moon Byeong Eun
Department of Bio-Systems Engineering, Institute of Smart Farm, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 18;11(1):222. doi: 10.3390/ani11010222.
Indoor air temperature (IAT) and indoor relative humidity (IRH) are the prominent microclimatic variables; still, potential contributors that influence the homeostasis of livestock animals reared in closed barns. Further, predicting IAT and IRH encourages farmers to think ahead actively and to prepare the optimum solutions. Therefore, the primary objective of the current literature is to build and investigate extensive performance analysis between popular ML models in practice used for IAT and IRH predictions. Meanwhile, multiple linear regression (MLR), multilayered perceptron (MLP), random forest regression (RFR), decision tree regression (DTR), and support vector regression (SVR) models were utilized for the prediction. This study used accessible factors such as external environmental data to simulate the models. In addition, three different input datasets named S1, S2, and S3 were used to assess the models. From the results, RFR models performed better results in both IAT (R = 0.9913; RMSE = 0.476; MAE = 0.3535) and IRH (R = 0.9594; RMSE = 2.429; MAE = 1.47) prediction among other models particularly with S3 input datasets. In addition, it has been proven that selecting the right features from the given input data builds supportive conditions under which the expected results are available. Overall, the current study demonstrates a better model among other models to predict IAT and IRH of a naturally ventilated swine building containing animals with fewer input attributes.
室内空气温度(IAT)和室内相对湿度(IRH)是显著的微气候变量;尽管如此,它们仍是影响封闭畜舍中饲养的家畜体内平衡的潜在因素。此外,预测IAT和IRH有助于农民积极提前思考并准备最佳解决方案。因此,当前文献的主要目的是构建并研究实际用于IAT和IRH预测的流行机器学习模型之间的广泛性能分析。同时,利用多元线性回归(MLR)、多层感知器(MLP)、随机森林回归(RFR)、决策树回归(DTR)和支持向量回归(SVR)模型进行预测。本研究使用外部环境数据等可获取因素来模拟模型。此外,使用了三个不同的输入数据集,分别命名为S1、S2和S3来评估模型。结果表明,在其他模型中,RFR模型在IAT(R = 0.9913;RMSE = 0.476;MAE = 0.3535)和IRH(R = 0.9594;RMSE = 2.429;MAE = 1.47)预测方面表现更好,尤其是在S3输入数据集的情况下。此外,已经证明从给定的输入数据中选择正确的特征可以建立支持性条件,从而获得预期结果。总体而言,当前研究展示了一个比其他模型更好的模型,用于预测包含较少输入属性动物的自然通风猪舍的IAT和IRH。