Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India.
Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India.
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 8;11(1):3295. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81233-4.
Fires determine vegetation patterns, impact human societies, and are a part of complex feedbacks into the global climate system. Empirical and process-based models differ in their scale and mechanistic assumptions, giving divergent predictions of fire drivers and extent. Although humans have historically used and managed fires, the current role of anthropogenic drivers of fires remains less quantified. Whereas patterns in fire-climate interactions are consistent across the globe, fire-human-vegetation relationships vary strongly by region. Taking a data-driven approach, we use an artificial neural network to learn region-specific relationships between fire and its socio-environmental drivers across the globe. As a result, our models achieve higher predictability as compared to many state-of-the-art fire models, with global spatial correlation of 0.92, monthly temporal correlation of 0.76, interannual correlation of 0.69, and grid-cell level correlation of 0.60, between predicted and observed burned area. Given the current socio-anthropogenic conditions, Equatorial Asia, southern Africa, and Australia show a strong sensitivity of burned area to temperature whereas northern Africa shows a strong negative sensitivity. Overall, forests and shrublands show a stronger sensitivity of burned area to temperature compared to savannas, potentially weakening their status as carbon sinks under future climate-change scenarios.
火灾决定植被格局,影响人类社会,是全球气候系统复杂反馈的一部分。经验和基于过程的模型在其规模和机制假设上存在差异,对火灾驱动因素和范围的预测存在分歧。尽管人类历史上曾使用和管理火灾,但人为驱动因素在当前火灾中的作用仍未得到充分量化。虽然火灾与气候相互作用的模式在全球范围内是一致的,但火灾与人类-植被的关系在区域上有很大差异。我们采用数据驱动的方法,使用人工神经网络学习全球各地火灾与其社会环境驱动因素之间的特定区域关系。结果,我们的模型在预测能力方面优于许多最先进的火灾模型,全球空间相关性为 0.92,月度时间相关性为 0.76,年际相关性为 0.69,网格单元水平相关性为 0.60,预测的与观测到的燃烧面积之间存在相关性。考虑到当前的社会-人为条件,赤道亚洲、南部非洲和澳大利亚的燃烧面积对温度的敏感性很强,而北非的敏感性则很强。总体而言,与热带稀树草原相比,森林和灌木丛的燃烧面积对温度的敏感性更强,这可能使其在未来气候变化情景下作为碳汇的地位减弱。