Department of Planning & Environmental Management, School of Environment, Education & Development, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 5;18(4):1527. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041527.
Covid-19 changed the way many people viewed and interacted with the natural environment. In the UK, a series of national lockdowns limited the number of places that individuals could use to support their mental and physical health. Parks, gardens, canals and other "green infrastructure" (GI) resources remained open and were repositioned as "essential infrastructure" supporting well-being. However, the quality, functionality and location of GI in urban areas illustrated a disparity in distribution that meant that in many cases communities with higher ethnic diversity, lower income and greater health inequality suffered from insufficient access. This paper provides commentary on these issues, reflecting on how planners, urban designers and environmental organizations are positioning GI in decision-making to address inequality. Through a discussion of access and quality in an era of austerity funding, this paper proposes potential pathways to equitable environmental planning that address historical and contemporary disenfranchisement with the natural environment in urban areas.
Covid-19 改变了许多人看待和与自然环境互动的方式。在英国,一系列全国性的封锁限制了个人可以用来支持身心健康的地方数量。公园、花园、运河和其他“绿色基础设施”(GI)资源仍然开放,并被重新定位为支持福祉的“必要基础设施”。然而,城市地区 GI 的质量、功能和位置表明分布不均,这意味着在许多情况下,族裔多样性更高、收入更低、健康不平等程度更高的社区面临着获取不足的问题。本文就这些问题进行了评论,反思了规划者、城市设计师和环境组织如何在决策中定位 GI,以解决不平等问题。通过讨论紧缩资金时代的可达性和质量问题,本文提出了实现公平环境规划的潜在途径,以解决城市地区历史和当代与自然环境脱节的问题。