Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021 Feb;53(2):120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.11.014.
Examine the association and moderating effect of residential location (urban/rural) on the relationship between neighborhood healthy food density and diet quality.
Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Health in Pregnancy and Postpartum study, a randomized trial designed to prevent excessive gestational weight gain.
Pregnant women in South Carolina with prepregnancy overweight/obesity (n = 228).
Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI) was used to measure diet quality from 2 24-hour dietary recalls. The HEI total scores and 11 binary HEI components (those that met the standard for maximum component score vs those that did not) were calculated as dependent variables.
Multiple linear and logistic regression models were used to examine the association between healthy food density and HEI total scores and meeting the standards for maximum component scores. Healthy food density × residential location tested for moderation. P < 0.05 indicated significance.
Participants' diet quality was suboptimal (mean, 52.0; SD, 11.7; range, 27-85). Healthy food density was not significantly related to HEI total scores or components, and residential location was not a moderator.
Diet quality was suboptimal, and there was no relationship between healthy food density and diet quality among Health in Pregnancy and Postpartum study participants. These data support examining behavioral factors that could influence diet quality.
检验居住地点(城市/农村)对社区健康食品密度与饮食质量之间关系的关联和调节作用。
健康妊娠和产后研究的基线数据的横断面分析,该研究是一项旨在预防妊娠体重过度增加的随机试验。
南卡罗来纳州有妊娠前超重/肥胖的孕妇(n=228)。
使用 24 小时膳食回顾来测量饮食质量的健康饮食指数-2015(HEI)。HEI 总分和 11 个二分 HEI 成分(达到最大成分得分标准的那些与未达到标准的那些)作为因变量进行计算。
使用多元线性和逻辑回归模型来检验健康食品密度与 HEI 总分和达到最大成分得分标准之间的关系。检验健康食品密度×居住地点是否存在调节作用。P<0.05 表示具有统计学意义。
参与者的饮食质量较差(平均为 52.0;标准差为 11.7;范围为 27-85)。健康食品密度与 HEI 总分或成分均无显著相关性,居住地点也不是一个调节因素。
饮食质量较差,健康妊娠和产后研究参与者的健康食品密度与饮食质量之间没有关系。这些数据支持检查可能影响饮食质量的行为因素。