Bannov Alexander G, Popov Maxim V, Brester Andrei E, Kurmashov Pavel B
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Novosibirsk State Technical University, 630073 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Micromachines (Basel). 2021 Feb 12;12(2):186. doi: 10.3390/mi12020186.
This review paper is devoted to an extended analysis of ammonia gas sensors based on carbon nanomaterials. It provides a detailed comparison of various types of active materials used for the detection of ammonia, e.g., carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, graphene, graphene oxide, and related materials. Different parameters that can affect the performance of chemiresistive gas sensors are discussed. The paper also gives a comparison of the sensing characteristics (response, response time, recovery time, operating temperature) of gas sensors based on carbon nanomaterials. The results of our tests on ammonia gas sensors using various techniques are analyzed. The problems related to the recovery of sensors using various approaches are also considered. Finally, the impact of relative humidity on the sensing behavior of carbon nanomaterials of various different natures was estimated.
这篇综述论文致力于对基于碳纳米材料的氨气传感器进行深入分析。它详细比较了用于检测氨气的各种活性材料,例如碳纳米管、碳纳米纤维、石墨烯、氧化石墨烯及相关材料。讨论了可能影响化学电阻式气体传感器性能的不同参数。该论文还比较了基于碳纳米材料的气体传感器的传感特性(响应、响应时间、恢复时间、工作温度)。分析了我们使用各种技术对氨气传感器进行测试的结果。还考虑了使用各种方法时与传感器恢复相关的问题。最后,评估了相对湿度对各种不同性质碳纳米材料传感行为的影响。