• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振成像对重度抑郁症治疗反应的个体预测:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Magnetic resonance imaging for individual prediction of treatment response in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 15;11(1):168. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01286-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41398-021-01286-x
PMID:33723229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7960732/
Abstract

No tools are currently available to predict whether a patient suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) will respond to a certain treatment. Machine learning analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data has shown potential in predicting response for individual patients, which may enable personalized treatment decisions and increase treatment efficacy. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of MRI-guided response prediction in MDD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies using MRI to predict single-subject response to antidepressant treatment in patients with MDD. Classification performance was calculated using a bivariate model and expressed as area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity. In addition, we analyzed differences in classification performance between different interventions and MRI modalities. Meta-analysis of 22 samples including 957 patients showed an overall area under the bivariate summary receiver operating curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.87), sensitivity of 77% (95% CI 71-82), and specificity of 79% (95% CI 73-84). Although classification performance was higher for electroconvulsive therapy outcome prediction (n = 285, 80% sensitivity, 83% specificity) than medication outcome prediction (n = 283, 75% sensitivity, 72% specificity), there was no significant difference in classification performance between treatments or MRI modalities. Prediction of treatment response using machine learning analysis of MRI data is promising but should not yet be implemented into clinical practice. Future studies with more generalizable samples and external validation are needed to establish the potential of MRI to realize individualized patient care in MDD.

摘要

目前尚无工具可预测患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者是否对某种治疗有反应。对磁共振成像(MRI)数据进行机器学习分析已显示出预测个体患者反应的潜力,这可能使治疗决策个性化并提高治疗效果。在这里,我们评估了 MRI 引导的 MDD 反应预测的准确性。我们对所有使用 MRI 预测 MDD 患者抗抑郁治疗个体反应的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。使用双变量模型计算分类性能,并表示为曲线下面积、敏感性和特异性。此外,我们还分析了不同干预措施和 MRI 方式之间分类性能的差异。荟萃分析了 22 个样本,包括 957 名患者,总体双变量汇总接收器操作特征曲线下面积为 0.84(95%CI 0.81-0.87),敏感性为 77%(95%CI 71-82),特异性为 79%(95%CI 73-84)。虽然电惊厥治疗结果预测(n=285,78%敏感性,83%特异性)的分类性能高于药物治疗结果预测(n=283,75%敏感性,72%特异性),但治疗方法或 MRI 方式之间的分类性能没有显著差异。使用 MRI 数据的机器学习分析预测治疗反应很有前景,但尚未在临床实践中实施。需要具有更具普遍性样本和外部验证的未来研究来确定 MRI 在 MDD 中实现个体化患者护理的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d29/7960732/a46fef2f1314/41398_2021_1286_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d29/7960732/fb0b922f4f04/41398_2021_1286_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d29/7960732/85fe87e382bb/41398_2021_1286_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d29/7960732/a46fef2f1314/41398_2021_1286_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d29/7960732/fb0b922f4f04/41398_2021_1286_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d29/7960732/85fe87e382bb/41398_2021_1286_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d29/7960732/a46fef2f1314/41398_2021_1286_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Magnetic resonance imaging for individual prediction of treatment response in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振成像对重度抑郁症治疗反应的个体预测:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 15;11(1):168. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01286-x.
2
Electroencephalography for predicting antidepressant treatment success: A systematic review and meta-analysis.脑电图预测抗抑郁治疗效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 15;321:201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.10.042. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
3
Prediction of Individual Response to Electroconvulsive Therapy via Machine Learning on Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.基于结构磁共振成像数据的机器学习预测个体对电抽搐治疗的反应。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 1;73(6):557-64. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0316.
4
Ensemble Learning for Early-Response Prediction of Antidepressant Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder.基于集成学习的重度抑郁症抗抑郁治疗早期反应预测。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jul;52(1):161-171. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27029. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
5
Predicting treatment response using EEG in major depressive disorder: A machine-learning meta-analysis.使用 EEG 预测重度抑郁症的治疗反应:一项机器学习的荟萃分析。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 12;12(1):332. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02064-z.
6
Using routine MRI data of depressed patients to predict individual responses to electroconvulsive therapy.利用抑郁患者的常规 MRI 数据预测个体对电抽搐治疗的反应。
Exp Neurol. 2021 Jan;335:113505. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113505. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
Abnormal Hippocampal Subfields May Be Potential Predictors of Worse Early Response to Antidepressant Treatment in Drug-Naïve Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.异常海马亚区可能是药物初治的重度抑郁症患者早期抗抑郁治疗反应较差的潜在预测指标。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(6):1760-1768. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26520. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
Classification of Major Depressive Disorder Based on Integrated Temporal and Spatial Functional MRI Variability Features of Dynamic Brain Network.基于动态脑网络的时空功能磁共振变异性特征对重度抑郁症的分类。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Sep;58(3):827-837. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28578. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model Based on Pretreatment Symptoms and Electroencephalographic Features to Predict Outcomes of Antidepressant Treatment in Adults With Depression: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.基于预处理症状和脑电图特征的机器学习模型评估对抑郁症成年患者抗抑郁治疗结局的预测:一项随机临床试验的预设二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206653. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6653.
10
Biological profiling of prospective antidepressant response in major depressive disorder: Associations with (neuro)inflammation, fatty acid metabolism, and amygdala-reactivity.重度抑郁症中潜在抗抑郁反应的生物学特征分析:与(神经)炎症、脂肪酸代谢及杏仁核反应性的关联
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 May;79:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards causal inference-based antidepressant selection with brain and blood biomarkers.迈向基于因果推断的抗抑郁药选择:借助脑和血液生物标志物
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02183-3.
2
Treatment outcome is associated with pre-treatment connectome measures across psychiatric disorders - evidence for connectomic reserve?治疗结果与跨精神疾病的治疗前脑连接组测量指标相关——脑连接储备的证据?
Neuroimage Clin. 2025 Aug 18;48:103870. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103870.
3
A decision-space model explains context-specific decision-making.

本文引用的文献

1
Corrigendum to "Applications of machine learning algorithms to predict therapeutic outcomes in depression: A meta-analysis and systematic review." J Affect Disord. 241 (2018) 519-532.《机器学习算法在预测抑郁症治疗结果中的应用:一项荟萃分析与系统评价》的勘误。《情感障碍杂志》。2018年第241卷,第519 - 532页。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:1211-1215. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.02.037. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
2
Prospective biomarkers of major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.前瞻性生物标志物在重度抑郁症中的应用:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;25(2):321-338. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0585-z. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
3
决策空间模型解释特定情境下的决策制定。
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 14;16(1):7437. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61466-x.
4
Translating phenotypic prediction models from big to small anatomical MRI data using meta-matching.使用元匹配方法将表型预测模型从大尺寸解剖MRI数据转换为小尺寸解剖MRI数据。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Aug 1;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00251. eCollection 2024.
5
Decoding Depression from Different Brain Regions Using Hybrid Machine Learning Methods.使用混合机器学习方法从不同脑区解码抑郁症
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Apr 24;12(5):449. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050449.
6
Generalizability of clinical prediction models in mental health.心理健康临床预测模型的可推广性。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-02950-0.
7
Prediction models for treatment response in migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.偏头痛治疗反应的预测模型:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Headache Pain. 2025 Feb 12;26(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-01972-x.
8
Antidepressant Treatment Response Prediction With Early Assessment of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Micro-RNA.通过功能近红外光谱和微小RNA的早期评估预测抗抑郁治疗反应
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2024 Nov 26;13:9-22. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3506556. eCollection 2025.
9
Predicting Antidepressant Treatment Response From Cortical Structure on MRI: A Mega-Analysis From the ENIGMA-MDD Working Group.基于MRI皮质结构预测抗抑郁治疗反应:ENIGMA-MDD工作组的一项荟萃分析
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Jan;46(1):e70053. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70053.
10
A stratified treatment algorithm in psychiatry: a program on stratified pharmacogenomics in severe mental illness (Psych-STRATA): concept, objectives and methodologies of a multidisciplinary project funded by Horizon Europe.精神病学中的分层治疗算法:一项关于严重精神疾病分层药物基因组学的计划(Psych-STRATA):由欧洲地平线资助的多学科项目的概念、目标和方法
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Dec 27. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01944-3.
Preliminary prediction of individual response to electroconvulsive therapy using whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging data.
利用全脑功能磁共振成像数据对电抽搐治疗个体反应的初步预测。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;26:102080. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102080. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
4
Neural correlates of weighted reward prediction error during reinforcement learning classify response to cognitive behavioral therapy in depression.在强化学习过程中,加权奖励预测误差的神经关联可对抑郁症的认知行为疗法反应进行分类。
Sci Adv. 2019 Jul 31;5(7):eaav4962. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav4962. eCollection 2019 Jul.
5
A multivariate neuroimaging biomarker of individual outcome to transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression.一种用于评估抑郁症经颅磁刺激治疗个体预后的多变量神经影像学生物标志物。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Nov 1;40(16):4618-4629. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24725. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
Evaluating the evidence for biotypes of depression: Methodological replication and extension of.评估抑郁症生物型的证据:方法学的复制和扩展。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101796. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101796. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Resting state functional connectivity predictors of treatment response to electroconvulsive therapy in depression.静息态功能连接预测抑郁症电抽搐治疗反应。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 25;9(1):5071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41175-4.
8
Prefrontal networks dynamically related to recovery from major depressive disorder: a longitudinal pharmacological fMRI study.前额叶网络与重度抑郁症的康复密切相关:一项纵向药物 fMRI 研究。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 4;9(1):64. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0395-8.
9
DATA-DRIVEN CLUSTER SELECTION FOR SUBCORTICAL SHAPE AND CORTICAL THICKNESS PREDICTS RECOVERY FROM DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS.基于数据驱动的皮质下形状和皮质厚度聚类选择可预测抑郁症状的恢复情况。
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2017 Apr;2017:502-506. doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2017.7950570. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Reducing the global burden of depression: a Lancet-World Psychiatric Association Commission.减轻全球抑郁症负担:《柳叶刀》-世界精神病学协会委员会
Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):e42-e43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32408-5. Epub 2018 Oct 25.