Suppr超能文献

耳鼻喉头颈外科床旁超声:一项前瞻性调查研究。

Point-of-care ultrasound in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: A prospective survey study.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Biomedical Engineering Office, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2021 Aug;120(8):1547-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The ultrasound applications, examination facilities and methods used by otolaryngology and head and neck surgeons may vary and be different. This study was conducted to assess the methods used for head-and-neck point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS).

METHODS

This prospective survey study was conducted from 1 July 2018 to 31 December 2019. The surgeons of otolaryngology and head neck surgery who used POCUS in their daily practice were recruited for analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 30 male and 14 female surgeons who used neck POCUS were recruited. Thirty-nine (89%) surgeons placed patients in a supine position with the head toward the operator. Forty (91%) surgeons performed US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), and 35 (80%) surgeons did not use local anesthesia during US-FNA. Thirty-nine (88%) surgeons used the long-axis method to harvest the specimen, and forty-one (93%) used a free-hand method. Most surgeons (25, 57%) used 22G needles for US-FNA, and 29 (66%) used 18G for US-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB). For the cost analysis, reimbursements for US-related procedures were relatively cheaper than those for computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

CONCLUSION

POCUS can be performed by otolaryngology and head and neck specialists with a wide scope of applications and in a cost-effective manner.

摘要

目的

耳鼻喉头颈外科医生使用的超声应用、检查设备和方法可能存在差异。本研究旨在评估头颈部即时超声检查(POCUS)的使用方法。

方法

本前瞻性调查研究于 2018 年 7 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日进行。招募了在日常实践中使用 POCUS 的耳鼻喉头颈外科医生进行分析。

结果

共招募了 30 名男性和 14 名女性使用颈部 POCUS 的外科医生。39 名(89%)外科医生将患者置于仰卧位,头朝向术者。40 名(91%)外科医生进行了超声引导下细针抽吸(FNA),35 名(80%)外科医生在 US-FNA 期间未使用局部麻醉。39 名(88%)外科医生使用长轴法采集标本,41 名(93%)外科医生使用徒手法。大多数外科医生(25 名,57%)使用 22G 针进行 US-FNA,29 名(66%)使用 18G 针进行超声引导下核心针活检(CNB)。在成本分析方面,与计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)相比,超声相关检查的报销费用相对较低。

结论

POCUS 可由耳鼻喉头颈外科专家广泛应用,且具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验