Suppr超能文献

2020年1月至3月中国浙江省新冠康复患者恢复期血浆中和活性的预测分析

Predictive Analysis of the Neutralization Activity in Convalescent Plasmas From COVID-19 Recovered Patients in Zhejiang Province, China, January-March, 2020.

作者信息

Yuan Yajie, Yu Liang, Jin Zi, Wang Yongjun, Gao Meng, Ding Haojie, Zhuo Xunhui, Zhu Xiao, Gao Fei, Zheng Xiaojun, Ying Guoqing, Xu Xiaowei, Kong Qingming, Lu Shaohong, Lv Hangjun

机构信息

Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.

School of Biological Engineering, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Mar 16;11:650487. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.650487. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Convalescent plasma (CP) transfusion is considered to be the priority therapeutic option for COVID-19 inpatients when no specific drugs are available for emerging infections. An alternative, simple, and sensitive method is urgently needed for clinical use to detect neutralization activity of the CP to avoid the use of inconvenient micro-neutralization assay.

METHOD

This study aims to explore optimal index in predicting the COVID-19 CP neutralization activity (neutralizing antibody titers, NAb titers) in an indirect ELISA format. Fifty-seven COVID-19-recovered patients plasma samples were subjected to anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD, S1, and N protein IgG antibody by indirect ELISA.

RESULTS

ELISA-RBD exhibited high specificity (96.2%) and ELISA-N had high sensitivity (100%); while ELISA-S1 had low sensitivity (86.0%) and specificity (73.1%). Furthermore, ELISA-RBD IgG titers and pseudovirus-based NAb titers correlated significantly, with R of 0.2564 (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

ELISA-RBD could be a substitute for the neutralization assay in resource-limited situations to screen potential plasma donors for further plasma infusion therapy.

摘要

背景

当针对新发感染没有特效药物时,恢复期血浆(CP)输注被认为是新冠病毒病住院患者的优先治疗选择。临床急需一种替代的、简便且灵敏的方法来检测CP的中和活性,以避免使用操作不便的微量中和试验。

方法

本研究旨在探索以间接酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)形式预测新冠病毒病CP中和活性(中和抗体滴度,NAb滴度)的最佳指标。采用间接ELISA法对57例新冠病毒病康复患者的血浆样本检测抗严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)受体结合域(RBD)、S1和N蛋白IgG抗体。

结果

ELISA-RBD具有高特异性(96.2%),ELISA-N具有高敏感性(100%);而ELISA-S1敏感性低(86.0%)且特异性低(73.1%)。此外,ELISA-RBD IgG滴度与基于假病毒的NAb滴度显著相关,相关系数R为0.2564(P<0.0001)。

结论

在资源有限的情况下,ELISA-RBD可替代中和试验,用于筛选潜在的血浆供体,以进行进一步的血浆输注治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e34a/8008148/2b7e60d0046f/fcimb-11-650487-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验