• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读不同叙事风格文学文本时的眼动与心理意象

Eye movements and mental imagery during reading of literary texts with different narrative styles.

作者信息

Magyari Lilla, Mangen Anne, Kuzmičová Anežka, Jacobs Arthur M, Lüdtke Jana

机构信息

Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University of Sciences, Hungary.

Norwegian Reading Centre, University of Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Mar 30;13(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.3.3.

DOI:10.16910/jemr.13.3.3
PMID:33828798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7886417/
Abstract

Based on Kuzmičová's [1] phenomenological typology of narrative styles, we studied the specific contributions of mental imagery to literary reading experience and to reading behavior by combining questionnaires with eye-tracking methodology. Specifically, we focused on the two main categories in Kuzmičová's [1] typology, i.e., texts dominated by an "enactive" style, and texts dominated by a "descriptive" style. "Enactive" style texts render characters interacting with their environment, and "descriptive" style texts render environments dissociated from human action. The quantitative analyses of word category distributions of two dominantly enactive and two dominantly descriptive texts indicated significant differences especially in the number of verbs, with more verbs in enactment compared to descriptive texts. In a second study, participants read two texts (one theoretically cueing descriptive imagery, the other cueing enactment imagery) while their eye movements were recorded. After reading, participants completed questionnaires assessing aspects of the reading experience generally, as well as their text-elicited mental imagery specifically. Results show that readers experienced more difficulties conjuring up mental images during reading descriptive style texts and that longer fixation duration on words were associated with enactive style text. We propose that enactive style involves more imagery processes which can be reflected in eye movement behavior.

摘要

基于库兹米乔娃[1]的叙事风格现象学类型学,我们通过将问卷调查与眼动追踪方法相结合,研究了心理意象对文学阅读体验和阅读行为的具体贡献。具体而言,我们聚焦于库兹米乔娃[1]类型学中的两个主要类别,即由“行动性”风格主导的文本和由“描述性”风格主导的文本。“行动性”风格的文本呈现人物与环境的互动,而“描述性”风格的文本呈现与人类行动相分离的环境。对两篇主要为行动性和两篇主要为描述性文本的词类分布进行的定量分析表明,尤其是动词数量存在显著差异,行动性文本中的动词比描述性文本更多。在第二项研究中,参与者阅读两篇文本(一篇理论上提示描述性意象,另一篇提示行动性意象),同时记录他们的眼动情况。阅读后,参与者完成问卷,评估一般阅读体验的各个方面,以及具体由文本引发的心理意象。结果表明,读者在阅读描述性风格文本时更难唤起心理意象,并且对单词的较长注视持续时间与行动性风格文本相关。我们提出,行动性风格涉及更多的意象过程,这可以在眼动行为中得到体现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/7b8871b84d00/jemr-13-03-c-figure-09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/08d6eb05a3ad/jemr-13-03-c-figure-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/25a1f9776266/jemr-13-03-c-figure-02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/f7179feb7e8d/jemr-13-03-c-figure-03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/0401db7e3bcb/jemr-13-03-c-figure-04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/8b561be15a4b/jemr-13-03-c-figure-05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/67f7b0f5f2bb/jemr-13-03-c-figure-06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/630d773549b1/jemr-13-03-c-figure-07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/4027c3b1fd3d/jemr-13-03-c-figure-08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/7b8871b84d00/jemr-13-03-c-figure-09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/08d6eb05a3ad/jemr-13-03-c-figure-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/25a1f9776266/jemr-13-03-c-figure-02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/f7179feb7e8d/jemr-13-03-c-figure-03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/0401db7e3bcb/jemr-13-03-c-figure-04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/8b561be15a4b/jemr-13-03-c-figure-05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/67f7b0f5f2bb/jemr-13-03-c-figure-06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/630d773549b1/jemr-13-03-c-figure-07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/4027c3b1fd3d/jemr-13-03-c-figure-08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065e/7886417/7b8871b84d00/jemr-13-03-c-figure-09.jpg

相似文献

1
Eye movements and mental imagery during reading of literary texts with different narrative styles.阅读不同叙事风格文学文本时的眼动与心理意象
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Mar 30;13(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.3.3.
2
What Is the Difference? Rereading Shakespeare's Sonnets -An Eye Tracking Study.有何不同?重读莎士比亚十四行诗——一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 26;11:421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00421. eCollection 2020.
3
Reading unspaced text: implications for theories of reading eye movements.阅读无空格文本:对阅读眼动理论的启示
Vision Res. 1994 Jul;34(13):1735-66. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90130-9.
4
Eye movements of second language learners when reading spaced and unspaced Chinese texts.第二语言学习者阅读间隔和无间隔中文文本时的眼动情况。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 13;14:783960. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.783960. eCollection 2023.
5
Eye movements during the reading of narrative and poetic texts. Symposium 6 at the 20th European Conference on Eye Movement Research (ECEM) in Alicante, 21.8.2019.阅读叙事文本和诗歌文本时的眼动。2019年8月21日在阿利坎特举行的第20届欧洲眼动研究会议(ECEM)上的研讨会6。
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Nov 25;12(7). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.7.9.
6
'Looking before and after': Can simple eye tracking patterns distinguish poetic from prosaic texts?“瞻前顾后”:简单的眼动追踪模式能否区分诗歌文本与散文文本?
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1066303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1066303. eCollection 2023.
7
Eye-tracking as a proxy for coherence and complexity of texts.眼动追踪作为文本连贯性和复杂性的替代指标。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 13;16(12):e0260236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260236. eCollection 2021.
8
Reading Shakespeare Sonnets: Combining Quantitative Narrative Analysis and Predictive Modeling -an Eye Tracking Study.阅读莎士比亚十四行诗:结合定量叙事分析与预测建模——一项眼动追踪研究
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Mar 27;12(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.5.2.
9
Child readers' eye movements in reading Thai.儿童读者阅读泰语时的眼动情况。
Vision Res. 2016 Jun;123:8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.009. Epub 2016 May 12.
10
Saccadic and smooth-pursuit eye movements during reading of drifting texts.阅读漂移文本时的扫视和平稳跟踪眼球运动。
J Vis. 2013 Aug 16;13(10):8. doi: 10.1167/13.10.8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Shape and Decoration on User Experience and Visual Attention in Anthropomorphic Robot Design.拟人机器人设计中形状与装饰对用户体验和视觉注意力的影响
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Mar 3;18(2):5. doi: 10.3390/jemr18020005. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Reading Russian poetry: An expert-novice study.阅读俄罗斯诗歌:一项专家与新手的研究。
J Eye Mov Res. 2022 May 16;13(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.3.7. eCollection 2020.
3
Do weak readers in rural India automatically read same language subtitles on Bollywood films? An eye gaze analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Reading Shakespeare Sonnets: Combining Quantitative Narrative Analysis and Predictive Modeling -an Eye Tracking Study.阅读莎士比亚十四行诗:结合定量叙事分析与预测建模——一项眼动追踪研究
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Mar 27;12(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.5.2.
2
Reading English-Language Haiku: Processes of Meaning Construction Revealed by Eye Movements.阅读英文俳句:眼动揭示的意义构建过程
J Eye Mov Res. 2017 Feb 28;10(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.10.1.4.
3
What Is the Difference? Rereading Shakespeare's Sonnets -An Eye Tracking Study.有何不同?重读莎士比亚十四行诗——一项眼动追踪研究。
印度农村地区的阅读能力较弱者会自动阅读宝莱坞电影的同语言字幕吗?一项眼动分析。
J Eye Mov Res. 2022 Nov 24;15(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.15.5.4. eCollection 2022.
4
The Mechanism of Word Satiation in Tibetan Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements.藏文阅读中词汇饱和的机制:来自眼动的证据。
J Eye Mov Res. 2022 Nov 1;15(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.15.5.3. eCollection 2022.
5
Influence of eye movements on academic performance: A bibliometric and citation network analysis.眼动对学业成绩的影响:文献计量与引文网络分析
J Eye Mov Res. 2022 Sep 7;15(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.15.4.4. eCollection 2022.
6
Children's perspectives on being absorbed when reading fiction: A Q methodology study.儿童阅读小说时沉浸其中的观点:一项Q方法研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 6;13:966820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966820. eCollection 2022.
7
An Empirical Study on Imagery and Emotional Response in Chinese Poetry Translation-The Visual Grammar Perspective.中国诗歌翻译中意象与情感反应的实证研究——视觉语法视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 12;13:872497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872497. eCollection 2022.
8
Micropoetry Meets Neurocognitive Poetics: Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry.微观诗歌与神经认知诗学:联想对诗歌接受的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 20;12:737756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737756. eCollection 2021.
9
Fluctuation in Pupil Size and Spontaneous Blinks Reflect Story Transportation.瞳孔大小波动和自发眨眼反映故事传递。
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Jun 1;13(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.3.6.
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 26;11:421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00421. eCollection 2020.
4
How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations.词识别测量的相关性如何?语言语境和重复呈现的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2800-2816. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1158-9.
5
Reading Dickens's characters: Employing psycholinguistic methods to investigate the cognitive reality of patterns in texts.解读狄更斯笔下的人物:运用心理语言学方法探究文本模式的认知现实
Lang Lit (Harlow). 2014 Nov;23(4):369-388. doi: 10.1177/0963947014543887. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
6
Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective.量化文字之美:神经认知诗学视角
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 19;11:622. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622. eCollection 2017.
7
Readers select a comprehension mode independent of pronoun: Evidence from fMRI during narrative comprehension.读者选择独立于代词的理解模式:叙事理解过程中功能磁共振成像的证据。
Brain Lang. 2017 Jul;170:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
Imaging Imageability: Behavioral Effects and Neural Correlates of Its Interaction with Affect and Context.成像 成像能力:其与情感和情境相互作用的行为效应及神经关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jul 15;10:346. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00346. eCollection 2016.
9
Presenting GECO: An eyetracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading.介绍GECO:一个单语和双语句子阅读的眼动追踪语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):602-615. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0734-0.
10
Taking Perspective: Personal Pronouns Affect Experiential Aspects of Literary Reading.换位思考:人称代词影响文学阅读的体验层面。
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0154732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154732. eCollection 2016.