• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究集体文化属性对新冠疫情相关公共卫生结果的影响。

Exploring the Effect of Collective Cultural Attributes on Covid-19-Related Public Health Outcomes.

作者信息

Erman Aysegul, Medeiros Mike

机构信息

Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 23;12:627669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627669. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627669
PMID:33833717
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8021731/
Abstract

Infections and deaths associated with COVID-19 show a high degree of heterogeneity across different populations. A thorough understanding of population-level predictors of such outcomes is crucial for devising better-targeted and more appropriate public health preparedness measures. While demographic, economic, and health-system capacity have featured prominently in recent work, cultural, and behavioral characteristics have largely been overlooked. However, cultural differences shape both the public policy response and individuals' behavioral responses to the crisis in ways that can impact infection dynamics and key health outcomes. To address this gap, we used meta-analytic methods to explore the global variability of three public health outcomes (i.e., crude test positivity, case/infection fatality, and mortality risk) during the first wave of the pandemic. This set of analyses identified several cultural/behavioral attributes (e.g., uncertainty avoidance and long-term vs. short-term normative orientation) as independent predictors of public health outcomes after adjusting for key demographic, political, economic, and health-system-related predictors; which were robust in sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, this study clearly demonstrates that cultural attributes do in fact account for some of the global disparities in COVID-19-attributed health outcomes. As a consequence, policymakers should more explicitly consider a society's cultural attributes alongside other important parameters such as demographic characteristics and health system constraints in order to develop better tailored and more effective policy responses.

摘要

与新冠病毒相关的感染和死亡在不同人群中表现出高度的异质性。深入了解此类结果在人群层面的预测因素对于制定更具针对性和更合适的公共卫生防范措施至关重要。虽然人口统计学、经济和卫生系统能力在近期研究中占据显著地位,但文化和行为特征在很大程度上被忽视了。然而,文化差异以可能影响感染动态和关键健康结果的方式塑造了公共政策反应以及个人对危机的行为反应。为了填补这一空白,我们使用荟萃分析方法来探究疫情第一波期间三种公共卫生结果(即粗检测阳性率、病例/感染死亡率和死亡风险)的全球变异性。这一系列分析确定了几种文化/行为属性(如不确定性规避以及长期与短期规范取向),在对关键人口统计学、政治、经济和卫生系统相关预测因素进行调整后,这些属性可作为公共卫生结果的独立预测因素;在敏感性分析中这些结果很稳健。总之,本研究清楚地表明,文化属性实际上确实导致了新冠病毒相关健康结果中的一些全球差异。因此,政策制定者在制定更具针对性和更有效的政策反应时,应更明确地将一个社会的文化属性与其他重要参数(如人口特征和卫生系统限制)一并考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93da/8021731/3c04c938288f/fpsyg-12-627669-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93da/8021731/fcfe993a67d1/fpsyg-12-627669-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93da/8021731/469ec9513c52/fpsyg-12-627669-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93da/8021731/4bc3dae847dd/fpsyg-12-627669-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93da/8021731/3c04c938288f/fpsyg-12-627669-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93da/8021731/fcfe993a67d1/fpsyg-12-627669-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93da/8021731/469ec9513c52/fpsyg-12-627669-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93da/8021731/4bc3dae847dd/fpsyg-12-627669-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93da/8021731/3c04c938288f/fpsyg-12-627669-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Effect of Collective Cultural Attributes on Covid-19-Related Public Health Outcomes.探究集体文化属性对新冠疫情相关公共卫生结果的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 23;12:627669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627669. eCollection 2021.
2
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The need for holistic, longitudinal and comparable, real-time assessment of the emotional, behavioral and societal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across nations.需要对新冠疫情在各国造成的情感、行为和社会影响进行全面、纵向、可比的实时评估。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Apr 19;32(1):15-18. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.010. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
6
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.评估 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日美国各州的 COVID-19 大流行政策和行为及其经济和教育方面的权衡取舍:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
8
Tuberculosis结核病
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Explaining People's Worry Levels During the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Socio-Economic and Cultural Dimensions.解释新冠疫情期间人们的担忧程度:社会经济和文化维度分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 6;12:737917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737917. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccination coverage in European and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.欧洲及经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)国家新冠疫苗接种覆盖率的决定因素。
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;12:1466858. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466858. eCollection 2024.
2
Public Engagement with Romanian Government Social Media Accounts during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间罗马尼亚政府社交媒体账号的公众参与度研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2372. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032372.
3
What Should I do and Who's to blame? A cross-national study on youth's attitudes and beliefs in times of COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptive and Dark Personality in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Predicting Health-Behavior Endorsement and the Appeal of Public-Health Messages.新冠疫情中的适应性与黑暗人格:预测健康行为认同及公共卫生信息的吸引力
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2021 Jul;12(5):697-707. doi: 10.1177/1948550620936439.
2
Government policies, national culture and social distancing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence.新冠疫情第一波期间的政府政策、国家文化与社会疏离:国际证据
Saf Sci. 2021 Mar;135:105138. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105138. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
3
Personality traits of world leaders and differential policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.
我该做什么,该怪谁?新冠疫情期间青少年态度和信念的跨国研究
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 21;17(12):e0279366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279366. eCollection 2022.
4
Media attention toward COVID-19 across 18 countries: The influence of cultural values and pandemic severity.媒体对 18 个国家/地区 COVID-19 的关注度:文化价值观和大流行严重程度的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0271961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271961. eCollection 2022.
5
Personality traits of world leaders and differential policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.世界领导人的性格特质与对新冠疫情的差异化政策应对
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Oct;311:115358. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115358. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
6
A conceptual model of mindful organizing for effective safety and crisis management. The role of organizational culture.用于有效安全与危机管理的正念组织概念模型。组织文化的作用。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Sep 5:1-20. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03702-x.
7
Adoption of measures to mitigate the impact of COVID-19: In search of a Hofstedian explanation for patterns among individual countries and country clusters.采取措施减轻新冠疫情的影响:探寻霍夫斯泰德理论对各个国家及国家集群模式的解释
Saf Sci. 2023 Jan;157:105902. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105902. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
8
Exploring Socioeconomic Status as a Global Determinant of COVID-19 Prevalence, Using Exploratory Data Analytic and Supervised Machine Learning Techniques: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.运用探索性数据分析和监督式机器学习技术,探索社会经济地位作为新冠病毒病流行率的全球决定因素:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 27;6(9):e35114. doi: 10.2196/35114.
9
Socio-cultural Correlates of the COVID-19 Outcomes.社会文化因素与 COVID-19 结局的相关性。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022 Sep;12(3):328-339. doi: 10.1007/s44197-022-00055-3. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
10
Lessons from past pandemics: a systematic review of evidence-based, cost-effective interventions to suppress COVID-19.从过去的大流行病中吸取的教训:系统评价有证据支持、具有成本效益的干预措施以抑制 COVID-19。
Syst Rev. 2022 May 12;11(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01958-9.
世界领导人的性格特质与对新冠疫情的差异化政策应对
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Oct;311:115358. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115358. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
4
Personality regulation of decisions on physical distancing: Cross-cultural comparison (Russia, Azerbaijan, China).身体距离决策的人格调节:跨文化比较(俄罗斯、阿塞拜疆、中国)
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 15;170:110418. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110418. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
The Emotional Path to Action: Empathy Promotes Physical Distancing and Wearing of Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic.从情感层面促进行动:同理心助力新冠疫情期间保持社交距离和佩戴口罩
Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1363-1373. doi: 10.1177/0956797620964422. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Psychological correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey.新冠疫情阴谋论信念与预防措施的心理关联:来自土耳其的证据。
Curr Psychol. 2021;40(11):5708-5717. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00903-0. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
Psychological and Behavioural Responses to Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Role of Personality.对2019冠状病毒病的心理和行为反应:人格的作用。
Eur J Pers. 2020 Jul 8. doi: 10.1002/per.2281.
8
Inverted Covariate Effects for First versus Mutated Second Wave Covid-19: High Temperature Spread Biased for Young.新冠疫情第一波与变异第二波中的反向协变量效应:高温传播对年轻人有偏向性。
Biology (Basel). 2020 Aug 14;9(8):226. doi: 10.3390/biology9080226.
9
United but divided: Policy responses and people's perceptions in the EU during the COVID-19 outbreak.联合但分裂:新冠疫情期间欧盟的政策应对与民众认知。
Health Policy. 2020 Sep;124(9):909-918. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Estimating The Infection Fatality Rate Among Symptomatic COVID-19 Cases In The United States.估计美国有症状的 COVID-19 病例中的感染病死率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1229-1236. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00455. Epub 2020 May 7.