Wilkes Rima, Wu Cary
Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, QC, Canada.
Front Sociol. 2019 May 17;4:32. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00032. eCollection 2019.
Many immigrants experience discrimination. In this paper we consider how discrimination affects their trust. We make a theoretical case for a formal mediation approach to studying the immigration, discrimination, and trust relationship. This approach shifts attention to the basic fact that the overall of discrimination experienced by different immigrant and native-born groups are not the same. We also build on previous empirical research by considering multiple forms of discrimination, multiple types of trust and multiple immigrant/native-born groups. Drawing on the 2013 Canadian General Social Survey data ( = 27,695) we analyze differences in three kinds of trust (generalized trust, trust in specific others, and political trust), and the role of perceived discrimination (ethnic, racial, any), between five immigrant-native groups (Canadian-born whites, Canadian-born people of color, foreign-born whites, foreign-born people of color, and Indigenous people). We find that perceived discrimination is more relevant to general trust and trust in specific others than to political trust. We also find that perceived discrimination explains more of the trust gap between racialized immigrants and the native-born than the gap between non-racialized immigrants and the native-born. The results illustrate that what appears to be a simple relationship is far more complex when attempting to explain group differences.
许多移民都经历过歧视。在本文中,我们探讨歧视如何影响他们的信任。我们提出了一种正式的中介方法来研究移民、歧视和信任之间的关系,这一方法将注意力转移到一个基本事实上,即不同移民群体和本土出生群体所经历的歧视总量是不一样的。我们还借鉴了以往的实证研究,考虑了多种形式的歧视、多种类型的信任以及多个移民/本土出生群体。利用2013年加拿大综合社会调查数据(样本量=27695),我们分析了五个移民-本土群体(加拿大出生的白人、加拿大出生的有色人种、外国出生的白人、外国出生的有色人种和原住民)在三种信任(普遍信任、对特定他人的信任和政治信任)方面的差异,以及感知到的歧视(族裔、种族、任何形式)所起的作用。我们发现,感知到的歧视与普遍信任和对特定他人的信任的相关性,高于与政治信任的相关性。我们还发现,感知到的歧视对种族化移民与本土出生者之间的信任差距的解释力,大于对非种族化移民与本土出生者之间信任差距的解释力。结果表明,在试图解释群体差异时,看似简单的关系实际上要复杂得多。