Wang Tao, Huang Pei-Jie, Chen Chen, Liu Ding-Wei, Yi Jing-Lin
Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi Province, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, the Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi Province, China.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 18;14(4):536-540. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.04.09. eCollection 2021.
To compare the results of visual acuity (VA) measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, 5 m Standard Logarithm Visual Acuity (5SL) chart, and 2.5 m Standard Logarithm Visual Acuity (2.5SL) chart in outpatients of age 12-80y.
Each patient (totally 2000 outpatients) had both eyes tested with ETDRS chart at 4 m, 5SL chart at 5 m, and 2.5SL chart at 2.5 m in random order. The VA values of outpatients were categorized by ages. VA values were expressed by logMAR recording method.
The mean VA results of ETDRS charts, 5SL, and 2.5SL chart were 0.52±0.28, 0.50±0.30, and 0.46±0.28 logMAR, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the three eye charts in the whole group (<0.001). For all subjects, the correlation of VA tested with three charts was statistically significant (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.944, 0.937, 0.946, all <0.001). Bland-Altman analysis shows the 95% limits of agreement between the 5SL and 2.5SL chart were -0.182 to 0.210, -0.139 to 0.251, and -0.151 to 0.235 logMAR, respectively).
The agreement between the three eye charts is not high. The VA measured by 5SL chart is slightly better than that by ETDRS chart and 5SL chart would be a suitable alternative when ETDRS chart are not available in the clinical situation. The VA measured by 2.5SL chart is about 0.5 line better than VA tested with ETDRS chart, which may overestimate VA.
比较早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)视力表、5米标准对数视力表(5SL)和2.5米标准对数视力表(2.5SL)在12至80岁门诊患者中测量的视力(VA)结果。
共有2000例门诊患者,每例患者的双眼分别按照随机顺序使用4米处的ETDRS视力表、5米处的5SL视力表和2.5米处的2.5SL视力表进行检测。门诊患者的视力值按年龄进行分类。视力值采用logMAR记录法表示。
ETDRS视力表、5SL视力表和2.5SL视力表的平均视力结果分别为0.52±0.28、0.50±0.30和0.46±0.28 logMAR。在整个组中,三种视力表之间存在统计学显著差异(<0.001)。对于所有受试者,三种视力表检测的视力之间的相关性具有统计学意义(Spearman相关系数分别为0.944、0.937、0.946,均<0.001)。Bland-Altman分析显示,5SL视力表和2.5SL视力表之间的95%一致性界限分别为-0.182至0.210、-0.139至0.251和-0.151至0.235 logMAR。
三种视力表之间的一致性不高。5SL视力表测量的视力略优于ETDRS视力表,并且在临床情况下无法使用ETDRS视力表时,5SL视力表将是一个合适的替代方案。2.5SL视力表测量的视力比ETDRS视力表检测的视力大约好0.5行,这可能会高估视力。