Suppr超能文献

门诊患者中使用ETDRS视力表和标准对数视力表测量视力的比较。

A comparison of visual acuity measured by ETDRS chart and Standard Logarithmic Visual Acuity chart among outpatients.

作者信息

Wang Tao, Huang Pei-Jie, Chen Chen, Liu Ding-Wei, Yi Jing-Lin

机构信息

Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi Province, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, the Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi Province, China.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 18;14(4):536-540. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.04.09. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the results of visual acuity (VA) measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, 5 m Standard Logarithm Visual Acuity (5SL) chart, and 2.5 m Standard Logarithm Visual Acuity (2.5SL) chart in outpatients of age 12-80y.

METHODS

Each patient (totally 2000 outpatients) had both eyes tested with ETDRS chart at 4 m, 5SL chart at 5 m, and 2.5SL chart at 2.5 m in random order. The VA values of outpatients were categorized by ages. VA values were expressed by logMAR recording method.

RESULTS

The mean VA results of ETDRS charts, 5SL, and 2.5SL chart were 0.52±0.28, 0.50±0.30, and 0.46±0.28 logMAR, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the three eye charts in the whole group (<0.001). For all subjects, the correlation of VA tested with three charts was statistically significant (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.944, 0.937, 0.946, all <0.001). Bland-Altman analysis shows the 95% limits of agreement between the 5SL and 2.5SL chart were -0.182 to 0.210, -0.139 to 0.251, and -0.151 to 0.235 logMAR, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The agreement between the three eye charts is not high. The VA measured by 5SL chart is slightly better than that by ETDRS chart and 5SL chart would be a suitable alternative when ETDRS chart are not available in the clinical situation. The VA measured by 2.5SL chart is about 0.5 line better than VA tested with ETDRS chart, which may overestimate VA.

摘要

目的

比较早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)视力表、5米标准对数视力表(5SL)和2.5米标准对数视力表(2.5SL)在12至80岁门诊患者中测量的视力(VA)结果。

方法

共有2000例门诊患者,每例患者的双眼分别按照随机顺序使用4米处的ETDRS视力表、5米处的5SL视力表和2.5米处的2.5SL视力表进行检测。门诊患者的视力值按年龄进行分类。视力值采用logMAR记录法表示。

结果

ETDRS视力表、5SL视力表和2.5SL视力表的平均视力结果分别为0.52±0.28、0.50±0.30和0.46±0.28 logMAR。在整个组中,三种视力表之间存在统计学显著差异(<0.001)。对于所有受试者,三种视力表检测的视力之间的相关性具有统计学意义(Spearman相关系数分别为0.944、0.937、0.946,均<0.001)。Bland-Altman分析显示,5SL视力表和2.5SL视力表之间的95%一致性界限分别为-0.182至0.210、-0.139至0.251和-0.151至0.235 logMAR。

结论

三种视力表之间的一致性不高。5SL视力表测量的视力略优于ETDRS视力表,并且在临床情况下无法使用ETDRS视力表时,5SL视力表将是一个合适的替代方案。2.5SL视力表测量的视力比ETDRS视力表检测的视力大约好0.5行,这可能会高估视力。

相似文献

5
Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.使用随机方法的视力测试 视力应用程序
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Mar;22(3):232-7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0073. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

5
Design and Implementation of a Smart Wireless Controlled Visual Acuity Measurement System.智能无线控制视力测量系统的设计与实现
J Med Signals Sens. 2023 Aug 31;13(4):307-318. doi: 10.4103/jmss.jmss_38_22. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
6
Effect of different screen brightness and devices on online visual acuity test.不同屏幕亮度和设备对在线视力测试的影响。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb;262(2):641-649. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06206-x. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
8
Temporal and spatial characterization of myopia in China.中国近视的时空特征。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;10:896926. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.896926. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Is conversion of decimal visual acuity measurements to logMAR values reliable?将十进制视力测量值转换为对数最小分辨角(logMAR)值是否可靠?
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;257(7):1513-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04344-9. Epub 2019 May 8.
8
Procedures for the Evaluation of the Visual System by Pediatricians.儿科医生评估视觉系统的程序。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3597. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
9
Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic.视力测试:从实验室到临床
Vision Res. 2013 Sep 20;90:2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 May 17.
10
Novel method for analyzing snellen visual acuity measurements.分析 Snellen 视力测量的新方法。
Retina. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(7):1046-50. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181d87e04.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验