• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄和性取向对一项针对高中生的旁观者聚焦式人际暴力预防项目的效果产生了调节作用。

Age and Sexual Orientation Moderated the Effects of a Bystander-Focused Interpersonal Violence Prevention Program for High School Students.

作者信息

Waterman Emily A, Edwards Katie M, Banyard Victoria L, Chang Hong

机构信息

Bennington College, 1 College Drive, Bennington, VT, 05201, USA.

Nebraska Center for Research on Children Youth, Families, and Schools, University of Nebraska, NE, 68588, Lincoln, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2022 Jan;23(1):96-107. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01245-4. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-021-01245-4
PMID:33893572
Abstract

The objective of the current paper was to identify moderating factors of a bystander-focused violence prevention program for adolescents, Bringing in the Bystander-High School Curriculum. Participants were 2,403 high school students from 25 schools in northern New England (M age = 15.8 years; 50.9% female; 85.1% White, 84.5% heterosexual) who participated in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. We examined impact among different social groups (i.e., by race, gender, age, poverty, sexual orientation) using moderation analyses. The intervention effects for the past 12-month sexual harassment and stalking perpetration were stronger for younger participants and heterosexual participants; poverty, race, and gender did not moderate any program effects. Findings indicate that future prevention research should consider additional targets for older adolescents that may improve intervention program efficacy. An urgent need exists for interventions that are effective for sexual minority adolescents.

摘要

本文的目的是确定以旁观者为重点的青少年暴力预防项目“引入旁观者——高中课程”的调节因素。参与者是来自新英格兰北部25所学校的2403名高中生(平均年龄=15.8岁;50.9%为女性;85.1%为白人,84.5%为异性恋),他们参与了一项整群随机对照试验。我们使用调节分析研究了不同社会群体(即按种族、性别、年龄、贫困状况、性取向划分)之间的影响。对于过去12个月的性骚扰和跟踪行为,干预效果在年轻参与者和异性恋参与者中更强;贫困、种族和性别并未调节任何项目效果。研究结果表明,未来的预防研究应考虑针对年龄较大青少年的其他目标,这可能会提高干预项目的效果。迫切需要对性少数青少年有效的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Age and Sexual Orientation Moderated the Effects of a Bystander-Focused Interpersonal Violence Prevention Program for High School Students.年龄和性取向对一项针对高中生的旁观者聚焦式人际暴力预防项目的效果产生了调节作用。
Prev Sci. 2022 Jan;23(1):96-107. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01245-4. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Bystander Program Effectiveness to Reduce Violence and Violence Acceptance Within Sexual Minority Male and Female High School Students Using a Cluster RCT.利用整群随机对照试验评估旁观者项目对减少性少数男、女高中生暴力行为和暴力接受度的效果。
Prev Sci. 2020 Apr;21(3):434-444. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01073-7.
3
Evaluation of a Bystander-Focused Interpersonal Violence Prevention Program with High School Students.评估面向旁观者的高中生人际暴力预防计划。
Prev Sci. 2019 May;20(4):488-498. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01000-w. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
4
RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence.随机对照试验:测试旁观者减少暴力行为的有效性
Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):566-578. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
5
A cluster-randomized trial of a middle school gender violence prevention program: Design, rationale, and sample characteristics.一项中学性别暴力预防项目的整群随机试验:设计、原理及样本特征
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Nov;62:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
6
Who do They Tell? College Students' Formal and Informal Disclosure of Sexual Violence, Sexual Harassment, Stalking, and Dating Violence by Gender, Sexual Identity, and Race.他们会告诉谁?大学生关于性暴力、性骚扰、跟踪骚扰及约会暴力的正式与非正式披露情况,按性别、性取向和种族划分
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP20092-NP20119. doi: 10.1177/08862605211050107. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
7
Bystander Program to Reduce Sexual Violence by Witnessing Parental Intimate Partner Violence Status.旁观者计划:通过见证父母亲密伴侣暴力状况减少性暴力。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Aug;63(2):262-272. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.12.022. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
8
Sexual Minority High School Boys' and Girls' Risk of Sexual Harassment, Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Bullying.性少数群体高中男女生遭受性骚扰、性暴力、跟踪和欺凌的风险。
Violence Against Women. 2021 Jul;27(9):1361-1378. doi: 10.1177/1077801220937811. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
9
Primary Versus Secondary Prevention Effects of a Gender-Transformative Sexual Violence Prevention Program Among Male Youth: A Planned Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.基于随机临床试验的计划性二次分析:男青年性别转换型性暴力预防项目的一级预防与二级预防效果。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Oct;38(19-20):11220-11242. doi: 10.1177/08862605231179717. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
10
Do Violence Acceptance and Bystander Actions Explain the Effects of Green Dot on Reducing Violence Perpetration in High Schools?是否接受暴力行为和旁观者行为解释了绿点在减少高中校园暴力行为方面的效果?
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Nov;36(21-22):10753-10774. doi: 10.1177/0886260519888206. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
An Online Program for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth Reduces Alcohol Use and Teen Dating Violence: A Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对性少数和性别少数青年的在线项目可减少酒精使用和青少年约会暴力:一项随机对照试验。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2025 Mar;86(2):287-296. doi: 10.15288/jsad.24-00007. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
2
Preventing sexual violence in sexual orientation and gender diverse communities: A call to action.预防性取向和性别多样性社区中的性暴力:行动呼吁。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;15(1):2297544. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2297544. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Alcohol's Effects on the Bystander Decision-Making Model: A Systematic Literature Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Bystander Intervention as a Prevention Strategy for Campus Sexual Violence: Perceptions of Historically Minoritized College Students.旁观者干预作为校园性暴力预防策略:历史上少数族裔大学生的看法。
Prev Sci. 2020 Aug;21(6):795-806. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01134-2.
2
Addressing the "Myth" of Racial Trauma: Developmental and Ecological Considerations for Youth of Color.解决“种族创伤”的“神话”:有色人种青年的发展和生态考量。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10567-019-00304-1.
3
Evaluation of a Bystander-Focused Interpersonal Violence Prevention Program with High School Students.
酒精对旁观者决策模型的影响:系统文献回顾。
J Sex Res. 2024 May-Jun;61(5):783-798. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2267547. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
4
Sexual and Gender Minority Men's Bystander Behaviors and Barriers in Response to Witnessing Minor Sexual Aggression.性与性别少数群体男性在目睹轻微性侵犯时的旁观者行为及障碍
Psychol Violence. 2023 Jul;13(4):319-328. doi: 10.1037/vio0000475. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Are school-based interventions to prevent dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence equally effective for all students? Systematic review and equity analysis of moderation analyses in randomised trials.以学校为基础的预防约会暴力、恋爱暴力和性别暴力的干预措施对所有学生的效果是否相同?随机试验中调节分析的系统评价与公平性分析
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jun 8;34:102277. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102277. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Bystanders of intimate partner violence against women and their willingness to intervene: An analysis of secondary data in Spain (2005-2020).亲密伴侣暴力对妇女的旁观者及其干预意愿:西班牙(2005-2020 年)的二次数据分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 20;17(9):e0274822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274822. eCollection 2022.
7
Rethinking Dating and SEXUAL Violence Prevention for Youth During the Pandemic: Examining Program Feasibility and Acceptability.重新思考大流行期间针对青年的约会和性暴力预防:检验方案的可行性和可接受性。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Feb;38(3-4):4114-4137. doi: 10.1177/08862605221111421. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
8
Evaluating the Impact of a Youth-Led Sexual Violence Prevention Program: Youth Leadership Retreat Outcomes.评估青年主导的性暴力预防项目的影响:青年领导力静修会成果。
Prev Sci. 2022 Nov;23(8):1379-1393. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01343-x. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
9
Exposure to Self-Directed Violence: Understanding Intention to Help and Helping Behaviors among Adolescents and Emerging Adults.暴露于自我导向暴力:理解青少年和新兴成年人的帮助意愿和帮助行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 14;18(16):8606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168606.
评估面向旁观者的高中生人际暴力预防计划。
Prev Sci. 2019 May;20(4):488-498. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01000-w. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
4
The Effects of Bystander Programs on the Prevention of Sexual Assault across the College Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.旁观者项目对大学期间性侵犯预防效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Feb;48(2):212-227. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0927-1. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Different Strokes for Different Folks? Contrasting Approaches to Cultural Adaptation of Parenting Interventions.因人而异?育儿干预文化适应的不同方法对比。
Prev Sci. 2017 Aug;18(6):630-639. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0671-2.
6
Racial-Ethnic Protective Factors and Mechanisms in Psychosocial Prevention and Intervention Programs for Black Youth.针对黑人青少年的心理社会预防与干预项目中的种族-族裔保护因素及机制
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2016 Jun;19(2):134-61. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0201-6.
7
Addressing Item-Level Missing Data: A Comparison of Proration and Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation.处理项目级缺失数据:比例分摊法与完全信息极大似然估计的比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(5):504-19. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1068157.
8
Standards of Evidence for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Scale-up Research in Prevention Science: Next Generation.预防科学中疗效、有效性及扩大研究的证据标准:下一代标准。
Prev Sci. 2015 Oct;16(7):893-926. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x.
9
Changing attitudes about being a bystander to violence: translating an in-person sexual violence prevention program to a new campus.对暴力旁观者态度的转变:将一个面对面的性暴力预防项目推广到新校园。
Violence Against Women. 2015 Feb;21(2):165-87. doi: 10.1177/1077801214564681. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
10
Challenge and opportunity in evaluating a diffusion-based active bystanding prevention program: Green Dot in high schools.评估基于扩散的主动旁观者预防计划的挑战与机遇:高中的“绿点”计划
Violence Against Women. 2014 Oct;20(10):1179-202. doi: 10.1177/1077801214551288. Epub 2014 Sep 24.