• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体上的乳腺癌:最常分享的新闻故事的可信度和内容类型的定性-定量研究。

Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories.

机构信息

Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.

Institute of Bioanalysis, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2021 May 15;21(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y
PMID:33992111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8123102/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Female breast cancer was the most diagnosed cancer in 2020, with more than two million new cases worldwide. Access to scientifically correct information can assist patients in early detection or prevention of the disease. However, misinformation on social networking sites (SNSs) about breast cancer can be propagated rapidly, posing a threat to health communication efforts. The aim of this study is to analyse the characteristics of the most shared news stories referencing the disease that circulated on SNSs, including the credibility of this content.

METHODS

This is an exploratory quali-quantitative study. Data collection was conducted between June 2019 and June 2020. We performed statistical and content analysis of the stories that had at least 1,000 total shares. Each story was classified in accordance to the following aspects: credibility; type of rumour; source; content type; mentions prevention or early detection/screening exams.

RESULTS

The abundance of news stories in our sample (n = 1,594) were not classified according to their credibility, as they do not address science, risk factors, prevention, treatment, or other aspects which can be assessed for scientific accuracy. However, content classified as "rumours" are 3.29 times more shared than those considered scientifically correct. Regarding content type, most stories are classified as 'real-life story' or 'solidarity' (67.69%). In our sample, 5.08% of the total comment on prevention and 19.7% reference early detection.

CONCLUSION

We consider it can be a good strategy, in SNSs, to combine content of greater popularity, such as real-life stories, with subjects that can make a difference in a patient's life, such as early detection, breast cancer symptoms and disease prevention strategies. Doctors, scientists and health journalists can expand the dialogue with the lay public regarding breast cancer, helping to counteract online misinformation.

摘要

背景

女性乳腺癌是 2020 年最常见的癌症,全球有超过 200 万例新发病例。获得科学正确的信息可以帮助患者早期发现或预防疾病。然而,社交网络(SNS)上关于乳腺癌的错误信息可能会迅速传播,对健康传播工作构成威胁。本研究旨在分析在 SNS 上传播的、引用该疾病的最常分享的新闻报道的特点,包括这些内容的可信度。

方法

这是一项探索性的质化研究。数据收集于 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 6 月之间进行。我们对至少有 1000 次总分享的报道进行了统计和内容分析。每个故事都根据以下方面进行分类:可信度、谣言类型、来源、内容类型、提及预防或早期检测/筛查检查。

结果

我们样本中的新闻报道数量丰富(n=1594),但没有按照可信度进行分类,因为它们没有涉及科学、风险因素、预防、治疗或其他可以评估科学准确性的方面。然而,被归类为“谣言”的内容被分享的次数是被认为是科学正确的内容的 3.29 倍。关于内容类型,大多数故事被归类为“真实故事”或“团结”(67.69%)。在我们的样本中,有 5.08%的评论涉及预防,19.7%的评论提到早期检测。

结论

我们认为,在 SNS 上,结合更受欢迎的内容(如真实故事)与可以对患者生活产生影响的主题(如早期检测、乳腺癌症状和疾病预防策略)是一个很好的策略。医生、科学家和健康记者可以与非专业人士扩大有关乳腺癌的对话,有助于对抗网络上的错误信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d20a/8126073/8aca67a4fbdd/12905_2021_1352_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d20a/8126073/bd01770a030c/12905_2021_1352_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d20a/8126073/8aca67a4fbdd/12905_2021_1352_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d20a/8126073/bd01770a030c/12905_2021_1352_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d20a/8126073/8aca67a4fbdd/12905_2021_1352_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories.社交媒体上的乳腺癌:最常分享的新闻故事的可信度和内容类型的定性-定量研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 May 15;21(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y.
2
Celebrities and Breast Cancer: A Multidimensional Quali-Quantitative Analysis of News Stories Shared on Social Media.名人与乳腺癌:社交媒体新闻报道的多维定性定量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159676.
3
Misinformation on social networks during the novel coronavirus pandemic: a quali-quantitative case study of Brazil.新型冠状病毒大流行期间社交网络上的错误信息:巴西的定性-定量案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):1200. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11165-1.
4
Frequencies of Private Mentions and Sharing of Mammography and Breast Cancer Terms on Facebook: A Pilot Study.脸书上乳腺钼靶检查和乳腺癌术语的私下提及与分享频率:一项试点研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 9;19(6):e201. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7508.
5
Earned media and public engagement with CDC's "Tips from Former Smokers" campaign: an analysis of online news and blog coverage.自有媒体与公众对美国疾病控制与预防中心“前吸烟者的小贴士”活动的参与:在线新闻与博客报道分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 20;17(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3645.
6
Changing the incentive structure of social media platforms to halt the spread of misinformation.改变社交媒体平台的激励结构以阻止错误信息的传播。
Elife. 2023 Jun 6;12:e85767. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85767.
7
News media coverage of screening mammography for women in their 40s and tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer.新闻媒体对40多岁女性乳腺钼靶筛查及他莫昔芬用于乳腺癌一级预防的报道。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 19;287(23):3136-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.23.3136.
8
The spread of low-credibility content by social bots.社交机器人传播低可信度内容。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 20;9(1):4787. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
9
'There were some clues': a qualitative study of heuristics used by parents of adolescents to make credibility judgements of online health news articles citing research.“存在一些线索”:一项关于青少年父母在判断引用研究的在线健康新闻文章可信度时所使用启发法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e039692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039692.
10
News media stories about cancer on Facebook: How does story framing influence response framing, tone and attributions of responsibility?脸书上有关癌症的新闻媒体报道:故事框架如何影响回应框架、语气和责任归因?
Health (London). 2021 Nov;25(6):688-706. doi: 10.1177/1363459320912817. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining BRCA Previvors' Social Media Content Creation as a Form of Self and Community Care: Qualitative Interview Study.将携带乳腺癌易感基因(BRCA)女性的社交媒体内容创作作为自我及群体关怀形式的研究:质性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e67794. doi: 10.2196/67794.
2
Socio-Economic Inequalities in Beliefs About Cancer and its Causes: Evidence From two Population Surveys.关于癌症及其病因认知的社会经济不平等:来自两项人口调查的证据
Psychooncology. 2024 Dec;33(12):e70035. doi: 10.1002/pon.70035.
3
A roadmap to reduce the incidence and mortality of breast cancer by rethinking our approach to women's health.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation.错误信息对新冠疫情个体反应的影响以及应对错误信息灾难性后果的恢复力建议。
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Dec;8:100119. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
2
Breast cancer screening knowledge among Hungarian women: a cross-sectional study.匈牙利女性的乳腺癌筛查知识:一项横断面研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01204-9.
3
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.
通过重新思考我们对待女性健康的方式来降低乳腺癌发病率和死亡率的路线图。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan;209(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07522-4. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
4
Results of the Italian cross-sectional web-based survey "Nutrition and breast cancer, what would you like to know?" An attempt to collect and respond to patients' information needs, through social media.意大利基于网络的横断面调查“营养与乳腺癌,你想了解什么?”的结果。通过社交媒体收集并回应患者信息需求的一次尝试。
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 25;14:1436610. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1436610. eCollection 2024.
5
Beliefs, screening attitudes and breast cancer awareness of young women with neurofibromatosis type 1: A reflexive thematic analysis.1型神经纤维瘤病年轻女性的信念、筛查态度及乳腺癌认知:一项反思性主题分析
J Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;30(3):369-383. doi: 10.1177/13591053241255053. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
6
Examining the Effectiveness of Social Media for the Dissemination of Research Evidence for Health and Social Care Practitioners: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.考察社交媒体在传播健康和社会保健从业者研究证据方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 5;26:e51418. doi: 10.2196/51418.
7
Social Media Campaigns: A Game Changer for the Prevention of Breast Cancer in Romania.社交媒体活动:罗马尼亚预防乳腺癌的变革力量。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 22;12(8):865. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080865.
8
Characterizing user demographics in posts related to breast, lung and colon cancer on Japanese twitter (X).描述与日本推特上乳腺癌、肺癌和结肠癌相关帖子中的用户人口统计学特征(X)。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):6485. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56679-x.
9
Breast cancer prevention and treatment misinformation on Twitter: An analysis of two languages.推特上关于乳腺癌防治的错误信息:两种语言的分析
Digit Health. 2023 Oct 6;9:20552076231205742. doi: 10.1177/20552076231205742. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Metastatic Breast Cancer in Young Women: Systematic Assessment.关于年轻女性转移性乳腺癌的YouTube视频内容质量:系统评估
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Nov 14;9:e45101. doi: 10.2196/45101.
《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention.有效预防乳腺癌的关键步骤。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2020 Aug;20(8):417-436. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
"Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media.“点赞、分享和评论”:社交媒体中乳腺癌筛查话语的系统评价
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0231422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231422. eCollection 2020.
6
Perceived barriers to early diagnosis of breast Cancer in south and southwestern Ethiopia: a qualitative study.埃塞俄比亚南部和西南部乳腺癌早期诊断的认知障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00909-7.
7
Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media.社交媒体上与健康相关的错误信息传播的系统文献综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Nov;240:112552. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
8
'Fake News' in urology: evaluating the accuracy of articles shared on social media in genitourinary malignancies.泌尿外科领域的“假新闻”:评估社交媒体上分享的关于泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤文章的准确性
BJU Int. 2019 Oct;124(4):701-706. doi: 10.1111/bju.14787. Epub 2019 May 13.
9
How to Optimize Health Messages About Cancer on Facebook: Mixed-Methods Study.如何在脸书上优化关于癌症的健康信息:混合方法研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2018 Dec 18;4(2):e11073. doi: 10.2196/11073.
10
Perspectives in Primary Care: Disseminating Scientific Findings in an Era of Fake News and Science Denial.初级保健视角:在假新闻与科学否认时代传播科学发现
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Nov;16(6):490-491. doi: 10.1370/afm.2311.