Dahn M S, Lange M P, Jacobs L A
Department of Surgery, Veterans' Administration Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan.
Intensive Care Med. 1988;14(4):373-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00262891.
Central mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) monitoring in critically ill patients to estimate adequacy of peripheral perfusion is gaining increasing popularity. However, a number of unexpected responses, one of which is marked depression of regional (splanchnic) venous oxygen saturation which may coexist with normal or high SvO2, makes interpretation of this parameter difficult. The SvO2 and hepatic venous oxygen saturation levels in seven injured (postoperative) and 15 septic patients were measured. No substantial differences between central and hepatic venous oxygen saturation was noted in nonseptic patients, however, septic subjects exhibited a normal SvO2 of 70.5% +/- 8.7% at a time when the hepatic venous saturation was 55.6% +/- 14.4% which is a significant (p less than 0.05) reduction. This reduced oxygen saturation was noted to arise from an increased regional metabolic rate rather than reduced perfusion. Nevertheless, we conclude that a flow limited regional oxygen consumption may potentially exist despite the presence of a normal SvO2 in certain patient subgroups such as septic subjects. Therefore, a normal SvO2 should not be considered as sole criteria to insure optimal oxygen delivery in critically ill patients.
在危重症患者中,通过监测中心混合静脉血氧饱和度(SvO2)来评估外周灌注是否充足正变得越来越普遍。然而,出现了一些意外反应,其中之一是局部(内脏)静脉血氧饱和度显著降低,这可能与正常或较高的SvO2同时存在,使得对该参数的解读变得困难。对7名受伤(术后)患者和15名脓毒症患者的SvO2和肝静脉血氧饱和度水平进行了测量。在非脓毒症患者中,未观察到中心静脉和肝静脉血氧饱和度有实质性差异,然而,脓毒症患者在肝静脉血氧饱和度为55.6%±14.4%时,SvO2正常,为70.5%±8.7%,这是一个显著(p<0.05)降低。这种血氧饱和度降低被认为是由于局部代谢率增加而非灌注减少所致。尽管如此,我们得出结论,在某些患者亚组如脓毒症患者中,尽管SvO2正常,但可能存在血流限制的局部氧消耗。因此,不应将正常的SvO2视为确保危重症患者最佳氧输送的唯一标准。