Esteki Parinaz, Jahromi Maryam Zare, Tahmourespour Arezoo
Graduated of Dental School, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Feb 23;18:3. eCollection 2021.
This study assessed the antimicrobial activity of Biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement against , , and .
In this study, microbial suspensions were inoculated onto agar plates. The antimicrobial effects of MTA, Biodentine and CEM cement were assessed against , , and by the agar diffusion test. In each experimental group, 7 plates containing 3 wells were prepared and immediately filled with freshly mixed cements. Positive and negative control plates were prepared with/without the bacterial suspension, respectively. After 2 h of preincubation at room temperature, the plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The diameter of growth inhibition zones was measured after 24 h. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).
Biodentine showed strong antimicrobial activity against all three microorganisms with an average inhibition zone of 9.10 mm. The inhibitory effect of Biodentine on and was significantly superior to that of the other two cements ( < 0.05). MTA and CEM cement showed significantly higher antimicrobial activity against ( < 0.05). The antimicrobial effects of Biodentine on and were significantly greater than on ( < 0.05).
All cements revealed antimicrobial properties against the tested microbial strains. Biodentine had stronger antimicrobial effects against and compared with MTA and CEM cement. Furthermore, the largest inhibition zones around all three cements belonged to .
本研究评估了生物陶瓷(Biodentine)、三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)和富钙混合物(CEM)水泥对[具体微生物名称1]、[具体微生物名称2]和[具体微生物名称3]的抗菌活性。
在本研究中,将微生物悬液接种到琼脂平板上。通过琼脂扩散试验评估MTA、生物陶瓷和CEM水泥对[具体微生物名称1]、[具体微生物名称2]和[具体微生物名称3]的抗菌效果。在每个实验组中,制备7个含有3个孔的平板,并立即用新鲜混合的水泥填充。分别制备含/不含细菌悬液的阳性和阴性对照平板。在室温下预孵育2小时后,将平板在37°C下孵育24小时。24小时后测量生长抑制圈的直径。使用方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)分析数据。
生物陶瓷对所有三种微生物均表现出较强的抗菌活性,平均抑制圈为9.10毫米。生物陶瓷对[具体微生物名称1]和[具体微生物名称2]的抑制作用明显优于其他两种水泥(P < 0.05)。MTA和CEM水泥对[具体微生物名称3]表现出明显更高的抗菌活性(P < 0.05)。生物陶瓷对[具体微生物名称1]和[具体微生物名称2]的抗菌效果明显大于对[具体微生物名称3]的抗菌效果(P < 0.05)。
所有水泥对测试的微生物菌株均显示出抗菌性能。与MTA和CEM水泥相比,生物陶瓷对[具体微生物名称1]和[具体微生物名称2]具有更强的抗菌效果。此外,所有三种水泥周围最大的抑制圈属于[具体微生物名称3]。