• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习用于预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术的死亡率:一项中心间交叉验证研究。

Machine Learning for Predicting Mortality in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Inter-Center Cross Validation Study.

作者信息

Mamprin Marco, Lopes Ricardo R, Zelis Jo M, Tonino Pim A L, van Mourik Martijn S, Vis Marije M, Zinger Svitlana, de Mol Bas A J M, de With Peter H N

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Jun 4;8(6):65. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8060065.

DOI:10.3390/jcdd8060065
PMID:34199892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8227005/
Abstract

Current prognostic risk scores for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) do not benefit yet from modern machine learning techniques, which can improve risk stratification of one-year mortality of patients before TAVI. Despite the advancement of machine learning in healthcare, data sharing regulations are very strict and typically prevent exchanging patient data, without the involvement of ethical committees. A very robust validation approach, including 1300 and 631 patients per center, was performed to validate a machine learning model of one center at the other external center with their data, in a mutual fashion. This was achieved without any data exchange but solely by exchanging the models and the data processing pipelines. A dedicated exchange protocol was designed to evaluate and quantify the model's robustness on the data of the external center. Models developed with the larger dataset offered similar or higher prediction accuracy on the external validation. Logistic regression, random forest and CatBoost lead to areas under curve of the ROC of 0.65, 0.67 and 0.65 for the internal validation and of 0.62, 0.66, 0.68 for the external validation, respectively. We propose a scalable exchange protocol which can be further extended on other TAVI centers, but more generally to any other clinical scenario, that could benefit from this validation approach.

摘要

目前经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的预后风险评分尚未从现代机器学习技术中获益,而机器学习技术可以改善TAVI术前患者一年死亡率的风险分层。尽管机器学习在医疗保健领域取得了进展,但数据共享规定非常严格,通常会阻止在没有伦理委员会参与的情况下交换患者数据。一种非常稳健的验证方法,每个中心包括1300名和631名患者,以相互的方式在另一个外部中心使用其数据验证一个中心的机器学习模型。这是在没有任何数据交换的情况下实现的,仅通过交换模型和数据处理管道。设计了一个专用的交换协议来评估和量化模型在外部中心数据上的稳健性。使用较大数据集开发的模型在外部验证中提供了相似或更高的预测准确性。逻辑回归、随机森林和CatBoost在内部验证中的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.65、0.67和0.65,在外部验证中的曲线下面积分别为0.62、0.66、0.68。我们提出了一种可扩展的交换协议,可以在其他TAVI中心进一步扩展,但更广泛地适用于任何其他临床场景,这些场景可能会从这种验证方法中受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/1ccac8ebf18d/jcdd-08-00065-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/e9cedc01c72e/jcdd-08-00065-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/bd53be670403/jcdd-08-00065-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/d1efbb4891ca/jcdd-08-00065-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/c190c2552ebf/jcdd-08-00065-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/34e2d39b38e0/jcdd-08-00065-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/b17c97b39ecd/jcdd-08-00065-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/aaca5ab017da/jcdd-08-00065-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/1ccac8ebf18d/jcdd-08-00065-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/e9cedc01c72e/jcdd-08-00065-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/bd53be670403/jcdd-08-00065-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/d1efbb4891ca/jcdd-08-00065-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/c190c2552ebf/jcdd-08-00065-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/34e2d39b38e0/jcdd-08-00065-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/b17c97b39ecd/jcdd-08-00065-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/aaca5ab017da/jcdd-08-00065-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b6/8227005/1ccac8ebf18d/jcdd-08-00065-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning for Predicting Mortality in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Inter-Center Cross Validation Study.机器学习用于预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术的死亡率:一项中心间交叉验证研究。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Jun 4;8(6):65. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8060065.
2
Update and, internal and temporal-validation of the FRANCE-2 and ACC-TAVI early-mortality prediction models for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using data from the Netherlands heart registration (NHR).利用荷兰心脏注册(NHR)的数据,对用于经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的FRANCE - 2和ACC - TAVI早期死亡率预测模型进行更新、内部及时间验证。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jan 23;32:100716. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100716. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Local and Distributed Machine Learning for Inter-hospital Data Utilization: An Application for TAVI Outcome Prediction.用于医院间数据利用的本地和分布式机器学习:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)结果预测的应用
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 12;8:787246. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.787246. eCollection 2021.
4
Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后全因死亡率预测的机器学习。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Dec 22;9(8):768-777. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad002.
5
Development and validation of a prediction model for early mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) based on the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR): The TAVI-NHR risk model.基于荷兰心脏注册研究(NHR)的经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后早期死亡率预测模型的建立与验证:TAVI-NHR 风险模型。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(5):879-889. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30398. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
External validation of existing prediction models of 30-day mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in the Netherlands Heart Registration.荷兰心脏注册研究中经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后30天死亡率现有预测模型的外部验证
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 15;317:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
Personalised preinterventional risk stratification of mortality, length of stay and hospitalisation costs in transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a machine learning algorithm: a pilot trial.使用机器学习算法对经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的死亡率、住院时间和住院费用进行个体化术前风险分层:一项试点研究。
Open Heart. 2024 Feb 22;11(1):e002540. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002540.
8
Machine learning-based predictive risk models for 30-day and 1-year mortality in severe aortic stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.基于机器学习的经导管主动脉瓣植入术严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者30天和1年死亡率预测风险模型。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;374:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.12.023. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
9
Value of machine learning in predicting TAVI outcomes.机器学习在预测经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)结果中的价值。
Neth Heart J. 2019 Sep;27(9):443-450. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-1285-7.
10
Decision Trees for Predicting Mortality in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.用于预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术死亡率的决策树
Bioengineering (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;8(2):22. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8020022.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Risk Stratification and Outcome Prediction for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.人工智能在经导管主动脉瓣置换术风险分层和结果预测中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 11;15(7):302. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070302.
2
Machine Learning Identification of Modifiable Predictors of Patient Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者预后可改变预测因素的机器学习识别
JACC Adv. 2024 Jul 16;3(8):101116. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101116. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Artificial Intelligence in the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Aortic Stenosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Long-Term Mortality in TAVI Patients Using Machine Learning Techniques.使用机器学习技术预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者的长期死亡率
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Apr 16;8(4):44. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8040044.
2
Decision Trees for Predicting Mortality in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.用于预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术死亡率的决策树
Bioengineering (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;8(2):22. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8020022.
3
Machine Learning Prediction Models for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
人工智能在主动脉瓣狭窄的筛查、诊断及管理中的应用
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 17;25(1):31. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2501031. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence in predicting all-cause mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利用人工智能预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术全因死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 31;11:1343210. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1343210. eCollection 2024.
5
Personalised preinterventional risk stratification of mortality, length of stay and hospitalisation costs in transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a machine learning algorithm: a pilot trial.使用机器学习算法对经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的死亡率、住院时间和住院费用进行个体化术前风险分层:一项试点研究。
Open Heart. 2024 Feb 22;11(1):e002540. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002540.
6
Development and validation of explainable machine learning models for risk of mortality in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: TAVI risk machine scores.经导管主动脉瓣植入术死亡率风险的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:TAVI风险机器评分
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2023 Mar 17;4(3):225-235. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad021. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Local and Distributed Machine Learning for Inter-hospital Data Utilization: An Application for TAVI Outcome Prediction.用于医院间数据利用的本地和分布式机器学习:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)结果预测的应用
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 12;8:787246. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.787246. eCollection 2021.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后院内死亡率的机器学习预测模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 22;12(14):1328-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.013.
4
Value of machine learning in predicting TAVI outcomes.机器学习在预测经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)结果中的价值。
Neth Heart J. 2019 Sep;27(9):443-450. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-1285-7.
5
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.系统评价显示,机器学习在临床预测模型中并未优于逻辑回归。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
6
Guideline-defined futility or patient-reported outcomes to assess treatment success after TAVI: what to use? Results from a prospective cohort study with long-term follow-up.评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术后治疗成功的指南定义的无效性或患者报告的结局:该使用什么?一项长期随访的前瞻性队列研究结果
Open Heart. 2018 Sep 23;5(2):e000879. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000879. eCollection 2018.
7
Trends in patient characteristics and clinical outcome over 8 years of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术8年期间患者特征及临床结局的趋势
Neth Heart J. 2018 Sep;26(9):445-453. doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1129-x.
8
Novel United Kingdom prognostic model for 30-day mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后 30 天死亡率的新型英国预后模型。
Heart. 2018 Jul;104(13):1109-1116. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312489. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
9
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts.何时以及如何在随机临床试验中使用多重插补来处理缺失数据——附流程图的实用指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1.
10
Predicting Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: External Validation of the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry Model.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后死亡率预测:经导管瓣膜治疗登记模型的外部验证。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005481.