• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于医院间数据利用的本地和分布式机器学习:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)结果预测的应用

Local and Distributed Machine Learning for Inter-hospital Data Utilization: An Application for TAVI Outcome Prediction.

作者信息

Lopes Ricardo R, Mamprin Marco, Zelis Jo M, Tonino Pim A L, van Mourik Martijn S, Vis Marije M, Zinger Svitlana, de Mol Bas A J M, de With Peter H N, Marquering Henk A

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 12;8:787246. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.787246. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.787246
PMID:34869698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8632813/
Abstract

Machine learning models have been developed for numerous medical prognostic purposes. These models are commonly developed using data from single centers or regional registries. Including data from multiple centers improves robustness and accuracy of prognostic models. However, data sharing between multiple centers is complex, mainly because of regulations and patient privacy issues. We aim to overcome data sharing impediments by using distributed ML and local learning followed by model integration. We applied these techniques to develop 1-year TAVI mortality estimation models with data from two centers without sharing any data. A distributed ML technique and local learning followed by model integration was used to develop models to predict 1-year mortality after TAVI. We included two populations with 1,160 (Center A) and 631 (Center B) patients. Five traditional ML algorithms were implemented. The results were compared to models created individually on each center. The combined learning techniques outperformed the mono-center models. For center A, the combined local XGBoost achieved an AUC of 0.67 (compared to a mono-center AUC of 0.65) and, for center B, a distributed neural network achieved an AUC of 0.68 (compared to a mono-center AUC of 0.64). This study shows that distributed ML and combined local models techniques, can overcome data sharing limitations and result in more accurate models for TAVI mortality estimation. We have shown improved prognostic accuracy for both centers and can also be used as an alternative to overcome the problem of limited amounts of data when creating prognostic models.

摘要

机器学习模型已被开发用于众多医学预后目的。这些模型通常使用来自单一中心或区域登记处的数据来开发。纳入多个中心的数据可提高预后模型的稳健性和准确性。然而,多个中心之间的数据共享很复杂,主要是因为法规和患者隐私问题。我们旨在通过使用分布式机器学习和局部学习然后进行模型整合来克服数据共享障碍。我们应用这些技术,利用来自两个中心的数据开发1年经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)死亡率估计模型,而无需共享任何数据。一种分布式机器学习技术和局部学习然后进行模型整合被用于开发预测TAVI术后1年死亡率的模型。我们纳入了两组人群,分别有1160名患者(中心A)和631名患者(中心B)。实施了五种传统机器学习算法。将结果与在每个中心单独创建的模型进行比较。联合学习技术优于单中心模型。对于中心A,联合局部极端梯度提升(XGBoost)模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.67(单中心AUC为0.65),对于中心B,分布式神经网络模型的AUC为0.68(单中心AUC为0.64)。这项研究表明,分布式机器学习和联合局部模型技术可以克服数据共享限制,并产生更准确的TAVI死亡率估计模型。我们已证明两个中心的预后准确性均有所提高,并且在创建预后模型时也可作为克服数据量有限问题的一种替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc2/8632813/fd7c4eaf092c/fcvm-08-787246-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc2/8632813/9cb4e2956230/fcvm-08-787246-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc2/8632813/b2e47073f688/fcvm-08-787246-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc2/8632813/2855df069abb/fcvm-08-787246-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc2/8632813/fd7c4eaf092c/fcvm-08-787246-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc2/8632813/9cb4e2956230/fcvm-08-787246-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc2/8632813/b2e47073f688/fcvm-08-787246-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc2/8632813/2855df069abb/fcvm-08-787246-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc2/8632813/fd7c4eaf092c/fcvm-08-787246-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Local and Distributed Machine Learning for Inter-hospital Data Utilization: An Application for TAVI Outcome Prediction.用于医院间数据利用的本地和分布式机器学习:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)结果预测的应用
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 12;8:787246. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.787246. eCollection 2021.
2
Machine Learning for Predicting Mortality in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Inter-Center Cross Validation Study.机器学习用于预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术的死亡率:一项中心间交叉验证研究。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Jun 4;8(6):65. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8060065.
3
Performance of federated learning-based models in the Dutch TAVI population was comparable to central strategies and outperformed local strategies.基于联邦学习的模型在荷兰经导管主动脉瓣植入术人群中的表现与集中式策略相当,且优于局部策略。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 5;11:1399138. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1399138. eCollection 2024.
4
Value of machine learning in predicting TAVI outcomes.机器学习在预测经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)结果中的价值。
Neth Heart J. 2019 Sep;27(9):443-450. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-1285-7.
5
Temporal validation of 30-day mortality prediction models for transcatheter aortic valve implantation using statistical process control - An observational study in a national population.使用统计过程控制对经导管主动脉瓣植入术30天死亡率预测模型进行时间验证——一项全国性人群的观察性研究
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 10;9(6):e17139. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17139. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
External validation of existing prediction models of 30-day mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in the Netherlands Heart Registration.荷兰心脏注册研究中经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后30天死亡率现有预测模型的外部验证
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 15;317:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
Machine learning-based risk prediction of intrahospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.基于机器学习的 TAVI 术后患者院内临床结局的风险预测。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Mar;110(3):343-356. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01691-0. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
8
Single center experience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN™ Valve.单中心经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用 Edwards SAPIEN™瓣膜的经验。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2011 Oct;45(5):261-6. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2011.575174. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
9
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation without prior balloon valvuloplasty is associated with less pronounced markers of myocardial injury.未进行预先球囊瓣膜成形术的经导管主动脉瓣植入术与心肌损伤的标志物不那么明显相关。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Apr;61(2):243-249. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10651-3. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
10
Predicting Long-Term Mortality in TAVI Patients Using Machine Learning Techniques.使用机器学习技术预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者的长期死亡率
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Apr 16;8(4):44. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8040044.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Risk Stratification and Outcome Prediction for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.人工智能在经导管主动脉瓣置换术风险分层和结果预测中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 11;15(7):302. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070302.
2
Artificial Intelligence in the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Aortic Stenosis.人工智能在主动脉瓣狭窄的筛查、诊断及管理中的应用
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 17;25(1):31. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2501031. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Performance of federated learning-based models in the Dutch TAVI population was comparable to central strategies and outperformed local strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning for Predicting Mortality in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Inter-Center Cross Validation Study.机器学习用于预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术的死亡率:一项中心间交叉验证研究。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Jun 4;8(6):65. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8060065.
2
Decision Trees for Predicting Mortality in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.用于预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术死亡率的决策树
Bioengineering (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;8(2):22. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8020022.
3
Update and, internal and temporal-validation of the FRANCE-2 and ACC-TAVI early-mortality prediction models for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using data from the Netherlands heart registration (NHR).
基于联邦学习的模型在荷兰经导管主动脉瓣植入术人群中的表现与集中式策略相当,且优于局部策略。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 5;11:1399138. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1399138. eCollection 2024.
4
Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Machine Learning Approach with GRACE Score.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后主要不良心脏事件的预测:一种结合GRACE评分的机器学习方法
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2024 Jun 28;58(2):216-225. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2024.00836. eCollection 2024.
5
Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence in predicting all-cause mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利用人工智能预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术全因死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 31;11:1343210. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1343210. eCollection 2024.
6
Federated and distributed learning applications for electronic health records and structured medical data: a scoping review.联邦学习和分布式学习在电子健康记录和结构化医疗数据中的应用:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Nov 17;30(12):2041-2049. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad170.
利用荷兰心脏注册(NHR)的数据,对用于经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的FRANCE - 2和ACC - TAVI早期死亡率预测模型进行更新、内部及时间验证。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jan 23;32:100716. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100716. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Machine-learning model to predict the cause of death using a stacking ensemble method for observational data.使用堆叠集成方法对观察数据进行预测死因的机器学习模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jun 12;28(6):1098-1107. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa277.
5
Risk modeling in transcatheter aortic valve replacement remains unsolved: an external validation study in 2946 German patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的风险建模仍未解决:2946 例德国患者的外部验证研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Mar;110(3):368-376. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01731-9. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
External validation of existing prediction models of 30-day mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in the Netherlands Heart Registration.荷兰心脏注册研究中经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后30天死亡率现有预测模型的外部验证
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 15;317:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
Value of machine learning in predicting TAVI outcomes.机器学习在预测经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)结果中的价值。
Neth Heart J. 2019 Sep;27(9):443-450. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-1285-7.
8
Distributed deep learning networks among institutions for medical imaging.医疗机构之间的分布式深度学习网络。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):945-954. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy017.
9
Inadequacy of existing clinical prediction models for predicting mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.现有临床预测模型在预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术后死亡率方面存在不足。
Am Heart J. 2017 Feb;184:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
10
EuroSCORE II.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统 II(EuroSCORE II)。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):734-44; discussion 744-5. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs043. Epub 2012 Feb 29.