Suppr超能文献

评估SarQoL问卷在老年人肌少症筛查中的性能。

Assessment of the performance of the SarQoL questionnaire in screening for sarcopenia in older people.

作者信息

Geerinck Anton, Dawson-Hughes Bess, Beaudart Charlotte, Locquet Médéa, Reginster Jean-Yves, Bruyère Olivier

机构信息

Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Aug;33(8):2149-2155. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01913-z. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of its low prevalence and the need for physical tests to establish a diagnosis, recruiting sarcopenic people for clinical studies can be a resource-intensive process.

AIMS

We investigated whether the SarQoL, a 55-item questionnaire designed to measure quality of life in sarcopenia, could be used to identify older people with a high likelihood of being sarcopenic, and to compare its performance to the SARC-F tool.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of data from older, community-dwelling participants of the SarcoPhAge study, evaluated for sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP2 criteria, and who completed the SarQoL and SARC-F questionnaires. We determined the optimal threshold to distinguish between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic people with the Youden index. Screening performance was evaluated with the area under the curve (AUC) and by calculating sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

The analysis of 309 participants provided an optimal threshold value of ≤ 52.4 points for identifying people with sarcopenia with the SarQoL questionnaire, which resulted in a sensitivity of 64.7% (41.1-84.2%), a specificity of 80.5% (75.7-84.7%) and an AUC of 0.771 (0.652-0.889). Compared to the SARC-F, the SarQoL has greater sensitivity (64.7% vs 52.39%), but slightly lower specificity (80.5% vs. 86.6%).

DISCUSSION

The SarQoL questionnaire showed acceptable screening accuracy, on par with the SARC-F. The optimal threshold of ≤ 52.4 points should be confirmed in other cohorts of older people.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study showed that the SarQoL could potentially be applied in a screening strategy, with the added benefit of providing a measure of QoL at the same time.

摘要

背景

由于肌肉减少症患病率低且需要进行身体检查来确诊,招募肌肉减少症患者参与临床研究可能是一个资源密集型过程。

目的

我们调查了旨在测量肌肉减少症患者生活质量的55项问卷SarQoL,是否可用于识别肌肉减少症可能性高的老年人,并将其性能与SARC-F工具进行比较。

方法

我们对SarcoPhAge研究中年龄较大的社区居住参与者的数据进行了二次分析,这些参与者根据EWGSOP2标准进行了肌肉减少症评估,并完成了SarQoL和SARC-F问卷。我们用约登指数确定区分肌肉减少症患者和非肌肉减少症患者的最佳阈值。通过曲线下面积(AUC)以及计算敏感性和特异性来评估筛查性能。

结果

对309名参与者的分析得出,使用SarQoL问卷识别肌肉减少症患者的最佳阈值为≤52.4分,其敏感性为64.7%(41.1-84.2%),特异性为80.5%(75.7-84.7%),AUC为0.771(0.652-0.889)。与SARC-F相比,SarQoL具有更高的敏感性(64.7%对52.39%),但特异性略低(80.5%对86.6%)。

讨论

SarQoL问卷显示出可接受的筛查准确性,与SARC-F相当。≤52.4分的最佳阈值应在其他老年人群体中得到证实。

结论

这项探索性研究表明,SarQoL有可能应用于筛查策略,同时还能提供生活质量的测量这一额外益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验