Arnold Mark, Ru Giuseppe, Simmons Marion, Vidal-Diez Alberto, Ortiz-Pelaez Angel, Stella Pietro
EFSA J. 2021 Jul 8;19(7):e06686. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6686. eCollection 2021 Jul.
The European Commission asked EFSA whether the scientific data on the 2-year intensified monitoring in atypical scrapie (AS) outbreaks (2013-2020) provide any evidence on the contagiousness of AS, and whether they added any new knowledge on the epidemiology of AS. An ad hoc data set from intensified monitoring in 22 countries with index case/s of AS in sheep and/or goats (742 flocks from 20 countries, 76 herds from 11 countries) was analysed. No secondary cases were confirmed in goat herds, while 35 secondary cases were confirmed in 28 sheep flocks from eight countries. The results of the calculated design prevalence and of a model simulation indicated that the intensified monitoring had limited ability to detect AS, with no difference between countries with or without secondary cases. A regression model showed an increased, but not statistically significant, prevalence (adjusted by surveillance stream) of secondary cases in infected flocks compared with that of index cases in the non-infected flocks (general population). A simulation model of within-flock transmission, comparing a contagious (i.e. transmissible between animals under natural conditions) with a non-contagious scenario, produced a better fit of the observed data with the non-contagious scenario, in which each sheep in a flock had the same probability of developing AS in the first year of life. Based on the analyses performed, and considering uncertainties and data limitations, it was concluded that there is no new evidence that AS can be transmitted between animals under natural conditions, and it is considered more likely (subjective probability range 50-66%) that AS is a non-contagious, rather than a contagious disease. The analysis of the data of the EU intensified monitoring in atypical scrapie infected flocks/herds confirmed some of the known epidemiological features of AS but identified that major knowledge gaps still remain.
欧盟委员会询问欧洲食品安全局,非典型羊瘙痒病(AS)疫情(2013 - 2020年)中为期两年的强化监测科学数据是否能提供AS具有传染性的任何证据,以及这些数据是否增加了有关AS流行病学的新知识。分析了来自22个国家对有绵羊和/或山羊AS索引病例的强化监测的一个特别数据集(来自20个国家的742个羊群,来自11个国家的76个畜群)。山羊群中未确诊有二代病例,而在来自八个国家的28个绵羊群中确诊了35例二代病例。计算得出的设计患病率和模型模拟结果表明,强化监测检测AS的能力有限,有无二代病例的国家之间没有差异。一个回归模型显示,与未感染羊群(总体)中的索引病例相比,感染羊群中二代病例的患病率(按监测流调整)有所增加,但无统计学意义。一个群内传播模拟模型,将传染性(即在自然条件下可在动物之间传播)与非传染性情况进行比较,结果显示非传染性情况能更好地拟合观察数据,即羊群中的每只绵羊在出生第一年患AS的概率相同。基于所进行的分析,并考虑到不确定性和数据局限性,得出结论:没有新证据表明AS可在自然条件下在动物之间传播,并且认为AS更有可能(主观概率范围为50 - 66%)是非传染性疾病,而非传染性疾病。对欧盟非典型羊瘙痒病感染羊群/畜群强化监测数据的分析证实了AS的一些已知流行病学特征,但也发现主要知识差距仍然存在。