Locke Shannon M, Robinson Oliver J
Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, PSL University, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK; Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Comput Psychiatr. 2021;5(1):4-20. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.58. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
Affective bias - a propensity to focus on negative information at the expense of positive information - is a core feature of many mental health problems. However, it can be caused by wide range of possible underlying cognitive mechanisms. Here we illustrate this by focusing on one particular behavioural signature of affective bias - increased tendency of anxious/depressed individuals to predict lower rewards - in the context of the Signal Detection Theory (SDT) modelling framework. Specifically, we show how to apply this framework to measure affective bias and compare it to the behaviour of an optimal observer. We also show how to extend the framework to make predictions about bias when the individual holds incorrect assumptions about the decision context. Building on this theoretical foundation, we propose five experiments to test five hypothetical sources of this affective bias: beliefs about prior probabilities, beliefs about performance, subjective value of reward, learning differences, and need for accuracy differences. We argue that greater precision about the mechanisms driving affective bias may eventually enable us to better understand the mechanisms underlying mood and anxiety disorders.
情感偏差——一种以牺牲积极信息为代价而专注于消极信息的倾向——是许多心理健康问题的核心特征。然而,它可能由多种潜在的认知机制引起。在此,我们通过聚焦情感偏差的一种特定行为特征——焦虑/抑郁个体预测较低奖励的倾向增加——在信号检测理论(SDT)建模框架的背景下对此进行说明。具体而言,我们展示了如何应用此框架来测量情感偏差,并将其与最优观察者的行为进行比较。我们还展示了如何扩展该框架,以便在个体对决策情境持有错误假设时对偏差进行预测。基于这一理论基础,我们提出了五个实验来检验这种情感偏差的五个假设来源:关于先验概率的信念、关于表现的信念、奖励的主观价值、学习差异以及对准确性差异的需求。我们认为,对驱动情感偏差的机制有更精确的了解最终可能使我们能够更好地理解情绪和焦虑障碍背后的机制。