Wang Meng, Jia Lei, Li Xiao-Lan, Guo Jia-Yi, Fang Cong, Huang Rui, Liang Xiao-Yan
Reproductive Medicine Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
F S Rep. 2021 Feb 2;2(2):201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.01.004. eCollection 2021 Jun.
To investigate whether the cumulative clinical pregnancy rates (CCPR) and cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) increase as the oocyte retrieval cycle increases in women with poor ovarian response.
Retrospective cohort study.
Not applicable.
Women diagnosed of poor ovarian response (POR) according to the Bologna criteria and who completed in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles between January 2014 and December 2018.
Not applicable.
The conservative and optimistic estimations of CCPR and CLBR.
The conservative and optimistic estimates of CCPR peaked at the 6th complete cycle, reaching 36.44% and 71.61%, respectively. However, the conservative and optimistic estimates of CLBR peaked at the 4th complete cycle, reaching 20.22% and 38.31%, respectively. The live birth rate per complete cycle of mild stimulation protocol was comparable to other protocols after adjusting for the confounding factors. For patients ≤35 years, the live birth rate per complete cycle of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (adjusted odds ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.87) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol (adjusted odds ratio=0.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.81) were significantly lower than that of the mild stimulation.
It is not advisable to initiate more than four complete cycles for POR patients since CLBR do not increase after that. For POR patients ≤35 years, the live birth rate per complete cycle increased in women with mild stimulation protocol.
探讨卵巢反应不良女性的累积临床妊娠率(CCPR)和累积活产率(CLBR)是否随着取卵周期的增加而升高。
回顾性队列研究。
不适用。
根据博洛尼亚标准诊断为卵巢反应不良(POR)且在2014年1月至2018年12月期间完成体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射周期的女性。
不适用。
CCPR和CLBR的保守估计值和乐观估计值。
CCPR的保守估计值和乐观估计值在第6个完整周期达到峰值,分别为36.44%和71.61%。然而,CLBR的保守估计值和乐观估计值在第4个完整周期达到峰值,分别为20.22%和38.31%。在调整混杂因素后,轻度刺激方案每个完整周期的活产率与其他方案相当。对于年龄≤35岁的患者,孕激素预处理卵巢刺激方案(调整后的优势比=0.51,95%置信区间:0.30-0.87)和促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案(调整后的优势比=0.45,95%置信区间:0.24-0.81)每个完整周期的活产率显著低于轻度刺激方案。
对于POR患者,启动超过四个完整周期并不可取,因为此后CLBR不会增加。对于年龄≤35岁的POR患者,轻度刺激方案的每个完整周期活产率有所提高。