• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计电子健康福祉计划:参与式设计方法。

Designing an eHealth Well-Being Program: A Participatory Design Approach.

机构信息

Social Marketing @ Griffith, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147250.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18147250
PMID:34299700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8307955/
Abstract

In recent years, the relevance of eHealth interventions has become increasingly evident. However, a sequential procedural application to cocreating eHealth interventions is currently lacking. This paper demonstrates the implementation of a participatory design (PD) process to inform the design of an eHealth intervention aiming to enhance well-being. PD sessions were conducted with 57 people across four sessions. Within PD sessions participants experienced prototype activities, provided feedback and designed program interventions. A 5-week eHealth well-being intervention focusing on lifestyle, habits, physical activity, and meditation was proposed. The program is suggested to be delivered through online workshops and online community interaction. A five-step PD process emerged; namely, (1) collecting best practices, (2) participatory discovery, (3) initial proof-of-concept, (4) participatory prototyping, and (5) pilot intervention proof-of-concept finalisation. Health professionals, behaviour change practitioners and program planners can adopt this process to ensure end-user cocreation using the five-step process. The five-step PD process may help to create user-friendly programs.

摘要

近年来,电子健康干预措施的相关性变得越来越明显。然而,目前缺乏一种顺序的程序性应用来共同创建电子健康干预措施。本文展示了如何实施参与式设计(PD)过程,为旨在增强幸福感的电子健康干预措施的设计提供信息。PD 会议在四个会议上与 57 人进行了会议。在 PD 会议中,参与者体验了原型活动,提供了反馈并设计了项目干预措施。提出了一项为期 5 周的以生活方式、习惯、体育活动和冥想为重点的电子健康福祉干预措施。建议通过在线研讨会和在线社区互动来提供该计划。出现了一个五步 PD 过程;即(1)收集最佳实践,(2)参与式发现,(3)初步概念验证,(4)参与式原型设计,以及(5)试点干预概念验证定稿。卫生专业人员、行为改变从业者和计划规划者可以采用这一过程,通过五个步骤的过程确保最终用户共同创造。五步骤 PD 过程有助于创建用户友好型程序。

相似文献

1
Designing an eHealth Well-Being Program: A Participatory Design Approach.设计电子健康福祉计划:参与式设计方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147250.
2
A Multicomponent eHealth Intervention for Family Carers for People Affected by Psychosis: A Coproduced Design and Build Study.一项针对精神病患者家庭照顾者的多成分电子健康干预措施:一项联合设计与构建研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e14374. doi: 10.2196/14374.
3
Identifying Persuasive Design Principles and Behavior Change Techniques Supporting End User Values and Needs in eHealth Interventions for Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance: Qualitative Study.确定有说服力的设计原则和行为改变技术,以支持电子健康干预长期体重维持的最终用户的价值观和需求:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 30;22(11):e22598. doi: 10.2196/22598.
4
How People with Parkinson's Disease and Health Care Professionals Wish to Partner in Care Using eHealth: Co-Design Study.帕金森病患者和医疗保健专业人员希望如何通过电子健康进行合作护理:共同设计研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 21;22(9):e19195. doi: 10.2196/19195.
5
An eHealth Application in Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care: Health Care Professionals' Perspectives.头颈癌幸存者护理中的电子健康应用:医疗保健专业人员的观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 21;17(10):e235. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4870.
6
A Participatory Model for Cocreating Accessible Rehabilitation Technology for Stroke Survivors: User-Centered Design Approach.一种为中风幸存者共同创造无障碍康复技术的参与式模型:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Aug 23;11:e57227. doi: 10.2196/57227.
7
Using Participatory Design Methodologies to Co-Design and Culturally Adapt the Spanish Version of the Mental Health eClinic: Qualitative Study.运用参与式设计方法共同设计心理健康电子诊所的西班牙语版本并进行文化调适:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 2;21(8):e14127. doi: 10.2196/14127.
8
Guide Development for eHealth Interventions Targeting People With a Low Socioeconomic Position: Participatory Design Approach.针对社会经济地位较低人群的电子健康干预措施指南制定:参与式设计方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 4;25:e48461. doi: 10.2196/48461.
9
A new method for assessing content validity in model-based creation and iteration of eHealth interventions.一种在基于模型的电子健康干预措施创建与迭代中评估内容效度的新方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 15;17(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3811.
10
Designing Effective eHealth Interventions for Underserved Groups: Five Lessons From a Decade of eHealth Intervention Design and Deployment.为服务不足群体设计有效的电子健康干预措施:电子健康干预措施设计和部署十年的五个经验教训。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 7;24(1):e25419. doi: 10.2196/25419.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-Designing a Web-Based and Tablet App to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes of Early Psychosis Service Users in a Learning Health Care Network: User-Centered Design Workshop and Pilot Study.在学习型医疗网络中共同设计基于网络和平板电脑的应用程序,以评估早期精神病服务使用者的临床结果:以用户为中心的设计研讨会和试点研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 9;12:e65889. doi: 10.2196/65889.
2
Identifying app components that promote physical activity: a group concept mapping study.识别促进身体活动的应用程序组件:一项群组概念映射研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 29;12:e17100. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17100. eCollection 2024.
3
Improving Well-Being in Young Adults: A Social Marketing Proof-of-Concept.

本文引用的文献

1
The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity.《幸福感问卷:心理测量特性、人口统计学比较及效度证据》
J Posit Psychol. 2010;5(1):41-61. doi: 10.1080/17439760903435208. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
2
Translating Co-Design from Face-to-Face to Online: An Australian Primary Producer Project Conducted during COVID-19.从面对面到在线的共同设计翻译:澳大利亚在 COVID-19 期间进行的一个主要生产者项目。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;18(8):4147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084147.
3
Development and Evaluation of an Online Education-Entertainment Intervention to Increase Knowledge of HIV and Uptake of HIV Testing among Colombian Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM).
提升年轻人的幸福感:一项社会营销概念验证
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5248. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095248.
开发和评估一种在线教育-娱乐干预措施,以提高哥伦比亚男男性行为者(MSM)对艾滋病毒的认识和接受艾滋病毒检测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 12;18(4):1811. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041811.
4
A Mobile App to Optimize Social Participation for Individuals with Physical Disabilities: Content Validation and Usability Testing.一款优化肢体残疾个体社会参与的移动应用:内容验证和可用性测试。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1753. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041753.
5
I-DECIDE: A Social Prescribing and Digital Intervention Protocol to Promote Sexual and Reproductive Health and Quality of Life among Young Cape Verdeans.I-DECIDE:一项促进佛得角年轻人生殖健康和生活质量的社会处方和数字干预方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 20;18(3):850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030850.
6
Psychological distress, anxiety, family violence, suicidality, and wellbeing in New Zealand during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study.新冠疫情封锁期间新西兰的心理困扰、焦虑、家庭暴力、自杀意念和幸福感:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0241658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241658. eCollection 2020.
7
Factors associated with psychological distress, fear and coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.澳大利亚 COVID-19 大流行期间与心理困扰、恐惧相关的因素及应对策略。
Global Health. 2020 Oct 8;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00624-w.
8
Risk, resilience, psychological distress, and anxiety at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.德国 COVID-19 大流行初期的风险、弹性、心理困扰和焦虑。
Brain Behav. 2020 Sep;10(9):e01745. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1745. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
9
Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 大流行期间普通人群中的压力、焦虑和抑郁患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Global Health. 2020 Jul 6;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w.
10
Perspectives on "Novel" Techniques for Designing Age-Friendly Homes and Neighborhoods with Older Adults.关于与老年人共同设计宜居住宅和社区的“新颖”技术的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 10;17(5):1800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051800.