• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube 上有关癌症康复的信息质量高吗?

Is YouTube a high-quality source of information on cancer rehabilitation?

机构信息

Health Science University, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Selimiye, Tıbbiye Caddesi, Uskudar, 34668, Istanbul, Turkey.

Sante Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fenerbahce, Fener Kalamis Cd. No:32, Kadıkoy, Istanbul, 34726, Turkey.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Oct;16(5):1016-1022. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01093-9. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1007/s11764-021-01093-9
PMID:34347245
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Searching for information on the Internet, especially YouTube, is gaining popularity for cancer survivors. Based on the topic of online health information, the importance of studies using YouTube data for various cancer types and treatment methods has increased. This study aims to investigate the quality, reliability, and accuracy of YouTube videos on cancer rehabilitation (CR).

METHODS

YouTube search was performed on February 26th, 2021, with two keyword sets: "cancer rehabilitation" and "oncology rehabilitation." The modified DISCERN, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scoring system, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) were used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. The features of each video such as the number of likes, dislikes, and views, upload date, duration, like ratio, and the uploader profile were also collected.

RESULTS

Fifty-three of the first 200 videos shown in the search results met the criteria. Most of the videos were low quality. The most common uploader profile was academic institute/university hospital. The three most common subjects in the videos were CR definition, physical therapy and occupational therapy, and patient experiences. The mean modified DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores were 2.14, 2.03, and 2.78, respectively. Higher quality videos had longer duration, greater number of views, and better reliability scores.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that most of the rated videos were of low-quality and didn't provide sufficient information on the topic discussed. Higher-quality and more accurate YouTube videos are needed to increase awareness of CR.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

For cancer survivors, CR-related YouTube video content often provides information of low reliability. In this context, it is necessary to focus on the production of video content that includes clinical guides, references, and are based on clinical-based practices.

摘要

背景

互联网搜索,尤其是 YouTube,在癌症幸存者中越来越受欢迎。基于在线健康信息这一主题,使用 YouTube 数据研究各种癌症类型和治疗方法的重要性日益增加。本研究旨在调查癌症康复(CR)相关的 YouTube 视频的质量、可靠性和准确性。

方法

于 2021 年 2 月 26 日在 YouTube 上进行了两次关键词搜索:“癌症康复”和“肿瘤康复”。使用修改后的 DISCERN、《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)评分系统和全球质量评分(GQS)来评估视频的质量和可靠性。还收集了每个视频的点赞数、点赞率、观看次数、上传日期、时长、上传者资料等特征。

结果

在搜索结果的前 200 个视频中,有 53 个符合标准。大多数视频的质量较低。最常见的上传者资料是学术机构/大学医院。视频中最常见的三个主题是 CR 定义、物理治疗和职业治疗以及患者体验。修改后的 DISCERN、JAMA 和 GQS 评分的平均值分别为 2.14、2.03 和 2.78。质量较高的视频时长较长、观看次数较多且可靠性得分较高。

结论

结果表明,大多数评分视频的质量较低,没有提供足够的主题讨论信息。需要提高 CR 相关的高质量、更准确的 YouTube 视频数量以提高意识。

对癌症幸存者的启示

对于癌症幸存者来说,CR 相关的 YouTube 视频内容通常提供的可靠性较低。在这种情况下,有必要专注于制作包括临床指南、参考资料并基于临床实践的视频内容。

相似文献

1
Is YouTube a high-quality source of information on cancer rehabilitation?YouTube 上有关癌症康复的信息质量高吗?
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Oct;16(5):1016-1022. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01093-9. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
2
YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
3
YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.YouTube 作为脑卒中患者经颅磁刺激的信息来源:一项质量、可靠性和准确性分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105309. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
5
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
6
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
7
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
8
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.YouTube 上遗尿症视频的质量分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
9
Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on myopia: a video content analysis.评估YouTube上关于近视的视频的质量和可靠性:一项视频内容分析。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 18;44(1):329. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03250-2.
10
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing critical thinking and decision-making skills for cancer information: the Informed Health Choice-Cancer online learning resource.培养癌症信息的批判性思维和决策技能:明智健康选择 - 癌症在线学习资源。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01874-6.
2
YouTube Videos as an Information Source About Aerobic Exercise in Rehabilitation of Lung Cancer.YouTube视频作为肺癌康复中有氧运动信息来源的研究
Integr Cancer Ther. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15347354251331461. doi: 10.1177/15347354251331461. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
3
Spanish language version of the "Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool" (MQ-VET): Cross-cultural AI-supported adaptation and validation study.

本文引用的文献

1
YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
2
YouTube as a Source of Medical Information About Spinal Cord Stimulation.YouTube 作为脊髓刺激相关医学信息的来源。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Jan;24(1):156-161. doi: 10.1111/ner.13303. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
3
YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.YouTube 作为脑卒中患者经颅磁刺激的信息来源:一项质量、可靠性和准确性分析。
《医学质量视频评估工具》(MQ-VET)西班牙语版本:跨文化人工智能支持的改编与验证研究
Sci Prog. 2025 Jan-Mar;108(1):368504251327507. doi: 10.1177/00368504251327507. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
4
Quality of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Videos Available on TikTok and Bilibili: Content Analysis.抖音和哔哩哔哩上胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤视频的质量:内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 11;8:e60033. doi: 10.2196/60033.
5
Content quality and reliability of the YouTube videos about chronic prostatitis.YouTube 视频中关于慢性前列腺炎的内容质量和可靠性。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2024 Mar 30;55(1):e2015861. doi: 10.25100/cm.v55i1.5861. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
6
Assessing the Quality and Reliability of Cardiac Rehabilitation Information on YouTube: A Systematic Evaluation.评估YouTube上心脏康复信息的质量和可靠性:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 20;16(6):e62752. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62752. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
AI-Enhanced evaluation of YouTube content on post-surgical incontinence following pelvic cancer treatment.人工智能辅助评估YouTube上关于盆腔癌治疗后手术失禁的内容。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 May 4;26:101677. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101677. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Tumor Immunotherapy-Related Information on Internet-Based Videos Commonly Used by the Chinese Population: Content Quality Analysis.中国人群常用的基于互联网视频的肿瘤免疫治疗相关信息:内容质量分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 7;8:e50561. doi: 10.2196/50561.
9
Assessing the Quality of YouTube's Incontinence Information after Cancer Surgery: An Innovative Graphical Analysis.评估癌症手术后YouTube上失禁信息的质量:一种创新的图形分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 18;12(2):243. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020243.
10
Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube as sources of information on gastric cancer: assessment and analysis of the content and quality.哔哩哔哩、抖音和 YouTube 作为胃癌信息来源:内容和质量评估与分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17323-x.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105309. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
YouTube as source of information on 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak: a cross sectional study of English and Mandarin content.以 YouTube 作为 2019 新型冠状病毒疫情信息源:英文和简体中文内容的横断面研究。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 May-Jun;35:101636. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101636. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
YouTube as a source of patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms.YouTube 作为腹主动脉瘤患者信息的来源。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):637-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.230. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
7
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Education.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的YouTube视频作为患者教育的来源。
Asian Spine J. 2018 Dec;12(6):987-991. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.987. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Colorectal Cancer: What Do Our Patients Learn?作为结直肠癌信息来源的YouTube视频:我们的患者学到了什么?
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec;34(6):1160-1166. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1422-9.
9
Medical Education Videos for the World: An Analysis of Viewing Patterns for a YouTube Channel.面向世界的医学教育视频:对 YouTube 频道观看模式的分析。
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1150-1156. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002118.
10
Lingual orthodontic treatment: A YouTube™ video analysis.舌侧正畸治疗:YouTube™视频分析。
Angle Orthod. 2018 Mar;88(2):208-214. doi: 10.2319/090717-602.1. Epub 2017 Dec 19.