Gu Sifeng, Bodai Zsolt, Cowan Quinn T, Komor Alexis C
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Gene Genome Ed. 2021 Jun;1. doi: 10.1016/j.ggedit.2021.100005. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
Base editors are an innovative addition to the genome editing toolbox that introduced a new genome editing strategy to the field. Instead of using double-stranded DNA breaks, base editors use nucleobase modification chemistry to efficiently and precisely incorporate single nucleotide variants (SNVs) into the genome of living cells. Two classes of DNA base editors currently exist: deoxycytidine deamination-derived editors (CBEs, which facilitate C•G to T•A mutations) and deoxyadenosine deamination-derived base editors (ABEs, which facilitate A•T to G•C mutations). More recently, the development of mitochondrial base editors allowed the introduction of C•G to T•A mutations into mitochondrial DNA as well. Base editors show great potential as therapeutic agents and research tools, and extensive studies have been carried out to improve upon the original base editor constructs to aid researchers in a variety of disciplines. Despite their widespread use, there are few publications that focus on elucidating the biological pathways involved during the processing of base editor intermediates. Because base editors introduce unique types of DNA damage products (a U•G mismatch with a DNA backbone nick for CBEs, and an I•T mismatch with a DNA backbone nick for ABEs) to facilitate genome editing, a deep understanding of the DNA damage repair pathways that facilitate or impede base editing represents an important aspect for the further expansion and improvement of the technologies. Here, we first review canonical deoxyuridine, deoxyinosine, and single-stranded break repair. Then, we discuss how interactions among these different repair processes can lead to different base editing outcomes. Through this review, we hope to promote thoughtful discussions on the DNA repair mechanisms of base editing, as well as help researchers in the improvement of the current base editors and the development of new base editors.
碱基编辑器是基因组编辑工具库中的一项创新,为该领域引入了一种新的基因组编辑策略。碱基编辑器不使用双链DNA断裂,而是利用核碱基修饰化学方法,将单核苷酸变体(SNV)高效、精确地整合到活细胞基因组中。目前存在两类DNA碱基编辑器:源自脱氧胞苷脱氨的编辑器(CBE,促进C•G到T•A突变)和源自脱氧腺苷脱氨的碱基编辑器(ABE,促进A•T到G•C突变)。最近,线粒体碱基编辑器的开发也使得C•G到T•A突变能够引入线粒体DNA中。碱基编辑器作为治疗剂和研究工具显示出巨大潜力,并且已经进行了广泛研究以改进原始碱基编辑器构建体,以帮助各学科的研究人员。尽管它们被广泛使用,但很少有出版物专注于阐明碱基编辑器中间体加工过程中涉及的生物学途径。由于碱基编辑器引入独特类型的DNA损伤产物(CBE为带有DNA主链切口的U•G错配,ABE为带有DNA主链切口的I•T错配)以促进基因组编辑,深入了解促进或阻碍碱基编辑的DNA损伤修复途径是该技术进一步扩展和改进的一个重要方面。在这里,我们首先回顾经典的脱氧尿苷、脱氧肌苷和单链断裂修复。然后,我们讨论这些不同修复过程之间的相互作用如何导致不同的碱基编辑结果。通过这篇综述,我们希望促进关于碱基编辑DNA修复机制的深入讨论,并帮助研究人员改进当前的碱基编辑器和开发新的碱基编辑器。