University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Institute for Family Medicine, Lubeck, Germany.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 10;16(8):e0255034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255034. eCollection 2021.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) affects 10-24% of patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 in the primary care (PC) sector. As early detection is crucial for treatment, deep learning screening methods in PC setting could potentially aid in an accurate and timely diagnosis.
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the current state of knowledge regarding deep learning (DL) screening methods for DR in PC.
A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify suitable studies.
Suitable studies were selected by two researchers independently. Studies assessing DL methods and the suitability of these screening systems (diagnostic parameters such as sensitivity and specificity, information on datasets and setting) in PC were selected. Excluded were studies focusing on lesions, applying conventional diagnostic imaging tools, conducted in secondary or tertiary care, and all publication types other than original research studies on human subjects.
The following data was extracted from included studies: authors, title, year of publication, objectives, participants, setting, type of intervention/method, reference standard, grading scale, outcome measures, dataset, risk of bias, and performance measures.
The summed sensitivity of all included studies was 87% and specificity was 90%. Given a prevalence of DR of 10% in patients with DM Type 2 in PC, the negative predictive value is 98% while the positive predictive value is 49%.
Selected studies showed a high variation in sample size and quality and quantity of available data.
在初级保健(PC)环境中,10-24%的 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者会出现糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)。由于早期检测对于治疗至关重要,因此深度学习筛查方法在 PC 环境中可能有助于准确和及时的诊断。
本荟萃分析旨在确定当前关于深度学习(DL)在 PC 中用于 DR 筛查方法的知识状态。
通过 Medline、Web of Science 和 Scopus 进行系统文献检索,以确定合适的研究。
两名研究人员独立选择合适的研究。选择评估 DL 方法以及这些筛查系统(诊断参数,如敏感性和特异性、数据集和设置信息)在 PC 中的适用性的研究。排除的研究包括关注病变、应用常规诊断成像工具、在二级或三级保健机构进行的研究,以及除了关于人类受试者的原始研究以外的所有出版物类型。
从纳入的研究中提取以下数据:作者、标题、出版年份、目标、参与者、设置、干预/方法类型、参考标准、分级量表、结果测量、数据集、偏倚风险和性能测量。
所有纳入研究的综合敏感性为 87%,特异性为 90%。考虑到 2 型糖尿病患者在 PC 中 DR 的患病率为 10%,阴性预测值为 98%,阳性预测值为 49%。
选定的研究显示出样本量的高度差异以及可用数据的质量和数量的差异。