Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Aug;5(8):e506-e513. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00151-0.
Levels of child malnutrition and hunger across the world have decreased substantially over the past century, and this has had an important role in reducing mortality and improving health. However, progress has stalled. We examined whether family policies (eg, cash transfers from governments that aim to support households with children) are associated with reduced food insecurity.
In this observational analysis, we used a dataset of individual-level data that captured experience-based measures of food insecurity and sociodemographic characteristics collected by the Gallup World Poll in 142 countries for 2014-17. We then combined this dataset with indicators of the type and generosity of family policies in these countries, taken from the University of California, Los Angeles' World Policy Analysis Center. We used multilevel regression models to examine the association between the presence of family policies for households with children and the probability of reporting moderate or severe food insecurity or severe food insecurity (moderate or severe food insecurity was defined as a "yes" response to at least four of eight questions on the Gallup Food Insecurity Experience Scale, and severe food insecurity was defined as a "yes" response to at least seven questions). We controlled for multiple covariates, including individual-level measures of social position and country-level measures, such as gross domestic product. We further examined whether this association varied by household income level.
Using data from 503 713 households, we found that, on average, moderate or severe food insecurity is 4·09 percentage points (95% CI 3·50-4·68) higher in households with at least one child younger than 15 years than in households with no children and severe food insecurity is 2·20 percentage points (1·76-2·63) higher. However, the additional risk of food insecurity among households with children is lower in countries that provide financial support (either means-tested or universal) for families than for countries with little or no financial assistance. These policies not only reduce food insecurity on average, but they also reduce inequalities in food insecurity by benefiting the poorest households most.
In some countries, family policies have been cut back in the past decade and such retrenchment might expose low-income households to increased risk of food insecurity. By increasing investment in family policies, progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 2, zero hunger, might be accelerated and, in turn, improve health for all.
Wellcome Trust.
在过去的一个世纪里,全球儿童营养不良和饥饿的水平大幅下降,这对降低死亡率和改善健康状况起到了重要作用。然而,进展已经停滞不前。我们研究了家庭政策(例如,政府向有子女的家庭提供旨在支持他们的现金转移)是否与减少粮食不安全有关。
在这项观察性分析中,我们使用了一个个体层面数据的数据集,该数据集记录了 2014 年至 2017 年盖洛普世界民意调查中基于经验的粮食不安全程度以及社会人口特征。然后,我们将这个数据集与加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校世界政策分析中心提供的这些国家的家庭政策类型和慷慨程度的指标结合起来。我们使用多层次回归模型来研究有子女的家庭的家庭政策的存在与报告中度或严重粮食不安全或严重粮食不安全(中度或严重粮食不安全定义为对盖洛普粮食不安全经验量表中的至少四个问题回答“是”,严重粮食不安全定义为对至少七个问题回答“是”)之间的关联。我们控制了多个协变量,包括个体层面的社会地位和国家层面的措施,如国内生产总值。我们还进一步研究了这种关联是否因家庭收入水平而异。
使用来自 503713 户家庭的数据,我们发现,平均而言,有 15 岁以下儿童的家庭中度或严重粮食不安全的比例比没有孩子的家庭高 4.09 个百分点(95%置信区间 3.50-4.68),严重粮食不安全的比例高 2.20 个百分点(1.76-2.63)。然而,在为家庭提供财政支持(不论是有条件的还是普遍的)的国家,儿童家庭的粮食不安全的额外风险较低。这些政策不仅平均减少了粮食不安全,而且通过使最贫困的家庭受益最多,减少了粮食不安全的不平等。
在过去的十年中,一些国家削减了家庭政策,这种紧缩可能使低收入家庭面临更高的粮食不安全风险。通过增加对家庭政策的投资,可能会加速实现可持续发展目标 2,即零饥饿,从而改善所有人的健康。
惠康信托基金会。