Suppr超能文献

2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间面对面与远程即时超声护理点超声培训的比较。

Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Soni Nilam J, Boyd Jeremy S, Mints Gregory, Proud Kevin C, Jensen Trevor P, Liu Gigi, Mathews Benji K, Schott Christopher K, Kurian Linda, LoPresti Charles M, Andrus Phil, Nathanson Robert, Smith Natalie, Haro Elizabeth K, Mader Michael J, Pugh Jacqueline, Restrepo Marcos I, Lucas Brian P

机构信息

South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Department of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ultrasound J. 2021 Sep 6;13(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13089-021-00242-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lack of training is currently the most common barrier to implementation of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use in clinical practice, and in-person POCUS continuing medical education (CME) courses have been paramount in improving this training gap. Due to travel restrictions and physical distancing requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic, most in-person POCUS training courses were cancelled. Though tele-ultrasound technology has existed for several years, use of tele-ultrasound technology to deliver hands-on training during a POCUS CME course has not been previously described.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study comparing educational outcomes, course evaluations, and learner and faculty feedback from in-person versus tele-ultrasound POCUS courses. The same POCUS educational curriculum was delivered to learners by the two course formats. Data from the most recent pre-pandemic in-person course were compared to tele-ultrasound courses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

Pre- and post-course knowledge test scores of learners from the in-person (n = 88) and tele-ultrasound course (n = 52) were compared. Though mean pre-course knowledge test scores were higher among learners of the tele-ultrasound versus in-person course (78% vs. 71%; p = 0.001), there was no significant difference in the post-course test scores between learners of the two course formats (89% vs. 87%; p = 0.069). Both learners and faculty rated the tele-ultrasound course highly (4.6-5.0 on a 5-point scale) for effectiveness of virtual lectures, tele-ultrasound hands-on scanning sessions, and course administration. Faculty generally expressed less satisfaction with their ability to engage with learners, troubleshoot image acquisition, and provide feedback during the tele-ultrasound course but felt learners completed the tele-ultrasound course with a better basic POCUS skillset.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to a traditional in-person course, tele-ultrasound POCUS CME courses appeared to be as effective for improving POCUS knowledge post-course and fulfilling learning objectives. Our findings can serve as a roadmap for educators seeking guidance on development of a tele-ultrasound POCUS training course whose demand will likely persist beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

背景

目前,缺乏培训是临床实践中实施床旁超声(POCUS)的最常见障碍,而面对面的POCUS继续医学教育(CME)课程对于缩小这一培训差距至关重要。由于2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的旅行限制和保持社交距离的要求,大多数面对面的POCUS培训课程被取消。尽管远程超声技术已经存在了数年,但此前尚未有人描述过在POCUS CME课程中使用远程超声技术进行实践培训的情况。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究,比较面对面与远程超声POCUS课程的教育成果、课程评估以及学员和教员的反馈。两种课程形式向学员传授相同的POCUS教育课程。将大流行前最近一次面对面课程的数据与2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的远程超声课程数据进行比较。

结果

比较了面对面课程(n = 88)和远程超声课程(n = 52)学员的课前和课后知识测试成绩。尽管远程超声课程学员的课前知识测试平均成绩高于面对面课程学员(78%对71%;p = 0.001),但两种课程形式学员的课后测试成绩没有显著差异(89%对87%;p = 0.069)。学员和教员对远程超声课程的虚拟讲座、远程超声实践扫描环节和课程管理的有效性都给予了高度评价(5分制中为4.6 - 5.0)。教员普遍对他们在远程超声课程中与学员互动、解决图像采集问题以及提供反馈的能力不太满意,但认为学员完成远程超声课程后具备更好的基本POCUS技能。

结论

与传统的面对面课程相比,远程超声POCUS CME课程在提高课后POCUS知识和实现学习目标方面似乎同样有效。我们的研究结果可为寻求开发远程超声POCUS培训课程指导的教育工作者提供路线图,此类课程的需求可能在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后仍会持续。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f3e/8421494/ffb25b56d377/13089_2021_242_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验