Salzmann Killian, Sanchez Anthony M J, Borrani Fabio
Institute of Sport Sciences of University of Lausanne (ISSUL), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD), Faculty of Sports Sciences, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Performance Santé Environnement De Montagne (LIPSEM), Font-Romeu, France.
Front Physiol. 2021 Sep 1;12:722848. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.722848. eCollection 2021.
This study aimed to determine the effects of three levels of blood flow restriction (BFR) on and extraction kinetics during heavy cycling exercise transitions. Twelve healthy trained males completed two bouts of 10 min heavy intensity exercise without BFR (CON), with 40% or 50% BFR (BFR40 and BFR50, respectively). and tissue saturation index (TSI) were continuously measured and modelled using multiexponential functions. The time constant of the primary phase was significantly slowed in BFR40 (26.4 ± 2.0s; < 0.001) and BFR50 (27.1 ± 2.1s; = 0.001) compared to CON (19.0 ± 1.1s). The amplitude of the slow component was significantly increased ( < 0.001) with BFR in a pressure-dependent manner 3.6 ± 0.7, 6.7 ± 0.9 and 9.7 ± 1.0 ml·min·kg for CON, BFR40, and BFR50, respectively. While no acceleration of the primary component of the TSI kinetics was observed, there was an increase (p < 0.001) of the phase 3 amplitude with BFR (CON -0.8 ± 0.3% VS BFR40 -2.9 ± 0.9%, CON VS BFR50 -2.8 ± 0.8%). It may be speculated that BFR applied during cycling exercise in the heavy intensity domain shifted the working muscles to an dependent situation. The acceleration of the extraction kinetics could have reached a plateau, hence not permitting compensation for the slowdown of the blood flow kinetics, and slowing kinetics.
本研究旨在确定三个水平的血流限制(BFR)对高强度骑行运动转换过程中[具体物质]和[具体物质]提取动力学的影响。12名健康的受过训练的男性完成了两轮10分钟的无BFR高强度运动(CON),以及40%或50% BFR的运动(分别为BFR40和BFR50)。[具体物质]和组织饱和度指数(TSI)通过多指数函数进行连续测量和建模。与CON组(19.0±1.1秒)相比,BFR40组(26.4±2.0秒;P<0.001)和BFR50组(27.1±2.1秒;P = 0.001)的主要相时间常数显著减慢。慢成分的幅度随着BFR以压力依赖的方式显著增加(P<0.001),CON组、BFR40组和BFR50组分别为3.6±0.7、6.7±0.9和9.7±1.0毫升·分钟·千克。虽然未观察到TSI动力学主要成分的加速,但随着BFR,第3相幅度增加(P<0.001)(CON组-0.8±0.3% 对比 BFR40组-2.9±0.9%,CON组对比BFR50组-2.8±0.8%)。可以推测,在高强度领域的骑行运动中应用BFR会使工作肌肉转变为依赖[具体物质]的状态。提取动力学的加速可能已达到平台期,因此无法补偿血流动力学的减慢,并减缓了[具体物质]动力学。