Suppr超能文献

描述性理解和预测在 COVID-19 建模中的应用。

Descriptive understanding and prediction in COVID-19 modelling.

机构信息

LOGOS/BIAP, Department of Philosophy, Facultat de Filosofia, Univerity of Barcelona, C/ Montalegre 6-8, Room 4049, 08001, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Philosophy of the Natural Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University of Krakow, Grodka 52, Room 42, 33-332, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Sep 21;43(4):107. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00461-z.

Abstract

COVID-19 has substantially affected our lives during 2020. Since its beginning, several epidemiological models have been developed to investigate the specific dynamics of the disease. Early COVID-19 epidemiological models were purely statistical, based on a curve-fitting approach, and did not include causal knowledge about the disease. Yet, these models had predictive capacity; thus they were used to ground important political decisions, in virtue of the understanding of the dynamics of the pandemic that they offered. This raises a philosophical question about how purely statistical models can yield understanding, and if so, what the relationship between prediction and understanding in these models is. Drawing on the model that was developed by the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, we argue that early epidemiological models yielded a modality of understanding that we call descriptive understanding, which contrasts with the so-called explanatory understanding which is assumed to be the main form of scientific understanding. We spell out the exact details of how descriptive understanding works, and efficiently yields understanding of the phenomena. Finally, we vindicate the necessity of studying other modalities of understanding that go beyond the conventionally assumed explanatory understanding.

摘要

2020 年期间,新冠疫情对我们的生活产生了重大影响。自疫情开始以来,已经开发了多种流行病学模型来研究疾病的特定动态。早期的 COVID-19 流行病学模型纯粹是基于统计学的,采用曲线拟合方法,不包含有关疾病的因果知识。然而,这些模型具有预测能力;因此,由于它们提供了对大流行动态的理解,因此被用于为重要的政治决策提供依据。这就提出了一个哲学问题,即纯粹的统计模型如何能够产生理解,如果可以,那么这些模型中的预测和理解之间的关系是什么。我们利用健康计量和评估研究所开发的模型进行论证,早期的流行病学模型产生了一种我们称之为描述性理解的理解模式,这与所谓的解释性理解形成对比,后者被认为是科学理解的主要形式。我们详细阐述了描述性理解如何发挥作用,并有效地产生对现象的理解。最后,我们证明了有必要研究超越传统上假设的解释性理解的其他理解模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4704/8455498/34b7132fac6c/40656_2021_461_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验